Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Head and Neck Defects in the Age of Microvascular Reconstruction.

IF 0.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s13193-026-02567-x
Nongthombam Surjalata Devi, Smriti Panda, Chirom Amit Singh, Rakesh Kumar, Rohan Gupta, Mridul Rathi, Kapil Sikka, Rajeev Kumar, Anup Singh, Saurabh Vig, Prashant Sirohiya
{"title":"Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Head and Neck Defects in the Age of Microvascular Reconstruction.","authors":"Nongthombam Surjalata Devi, Smriti Panda, Chirom Amit Singh, Rakesh Kumar, Rohan Gupta, Mridul Rathi, Kapil Sikka, Rajeev Kumar, Anup Singh, Saurabh Vig, Prashant Sirohiya","doi":"10.1007/s13193-026-02567-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pedicled latissimus dorsi flap (LDF) based on the thoracodorsal artery provides large vascularized skin paddle along with underlying muscle. This study describes the relevance and feasibility of undertaking reconstruction of complex head and neck defects with pedicled LDF with emphasis on salvage situations and non-availability of pectoralis major flap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study on all consecutive cases of LDF reconstruction performed from July 2022 to June 2025. Modifications to the traditional LDF harvest introduced were: transaxillary tunnel creation in the supine, arm-abducted position and subpectoral tunnelling was avoided by careful division of the pectoralis major humeral fibres.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 patients underwent LDF reconstruction for head and neck defects during the study period. The indications for selecting the LDF for reconstruction were: recurrent head and neck cancer with vessel-depleted neck and prior use of pectoralis major (n = 5), salvage following necrosis of pectoralis major flap (n = 4) and primary form of reconstruction in female patients (n = 8). The head and neck sites reconstructed were: gingivobuccal complex (n = 11), tongue (n = 4) and temporal bone (n = 1). Flap survival rate was documented at 87.5%. Donor site seroma developed in 2 patients and minor would complication in the form of suture dehiscence was encountered in 1 patient. None of the patients developed restriction of shoulder mobility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Pedicled LDF is a promising fallback option following salvage surgeries and in the non-availability of pectoralis major flap.</p>","PeriodicalId":46707,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"17 9","pages":"2180-2186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13620028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-026-02567-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pedicled latissimus dorsi flap (LDF) based on the thoracodorsal artery provides large vascularized skin paddle along with underlying muscle. This study describes the relevance and feasibility of undertaking reconstruction of complex head and neck defects with pedicled LDF with emphasis on salvage situations and non-availability of pectoralis major flap.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study on all consecutive cases of LDF reconstruction performed from July 2022 to June 2025. Modifications to the traditional LDF harvest introduced were: transaxillary tunnel creation in the supine, arm-abducted position and subpectoral tunnelling was avoided by careful division of the pectoralis major humeral fibres.

Results: 16 patients underwent LDF reconstruction for head and neck defects during the study period. The indications for selecting the LDF for reconstruction were: recurrent head and neck cancer with vessel-depleted neck and prior use of pectoralis major (n = 5), salvage following necrosis of pectoralis major flap (n = 4) and primary form of reconstruction in female patients (n = 8). The head and neck sites reconstructed were: gingivobuccal complex (n = 11), tongue (n = 4) and temporal bone (n = 1). Flap survival rate was documented at 87.5%. Donor site seroma developed in 2 patients and minor would complication in the form of suture dehiscence was encountered in 1 patient. None of the patients developed restriction of shoulder mobility.

Conclusion:  Pedicled LDF is a promising fallback option following salvage surgeries and in the non-availability of pectoralis major flap.

带蒂背阔肌皮瓣修复微血管重建时代头颈部缺损。
背景:以胸背侧动脉为基础的带蒂背阔肌皮瓣(LDF)提供了大的带血管的皮肤叶片以及下面的肌肉。本研究描述了带蒂LDF重建复杂头颈部缺损的相关性和可行性,重点介绍了胸大肌皮瓣的保留情况和不可用性。方法:回顾性队列研究2022年7月至2025年6月连续行LDF重建的所有病例。对传统LDF收获的改进是:在仰卧位,手臂外展位建立腋窝隧道,通过仔细划分胸大肌肱纤维避免胸下隧道。结果:16例患者在研究期间接受了头颈部缺损的LDF重建。选择LDF进行重建的适应症为:复发性头颈癌伴颈部血管衰竭和既往使用过胸大肌(n = 5),胸大肌瓣坏死后的保留(n = 4)和女性患者的原发性重建(n = 8)。重建的头颈部部位为:龈颊复合体(n = 11)、舌(n = 4)和颞骨(n = 1)。皮瓣存活率为87.5%。2例患者出现供区血肿,1例患者出现轻微并发症,表现为缝线断裂。没有患者出现肩部活动受限。结论:带蒂LDF是一种有希望的后备选择,在挽救性手术后,没有胸大肌瓣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to encourage and promote clinical and research activities pertaining to Surgical Oncology. It also aims to bring in the concept of multidisciplinary team approach in management of various cancers. The Journal would publish original article, point of technique, review article, case report, letter to editor, profiles of eminent teachers, surgeons and instititions - a short (up to 500 words) of the Cancer Institutions, departments, and oncologist, who founded new departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书