Effects of Concurrent Training plus Cricket Protein Hydrolysate Supplementation on Blood Pressure, Arterial Stiffness, and Heart Rate Variability in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.8 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Pilanee Vaithanomsat, Piyaporn Tumnark, Udomlak Sukatta, Phornpimon Janchai, Jatuporn Phoemsapthawee
{"title":"Effects of Concurrent Training plus Cricket Protein Hydrolysate Supplementation on Blood Pressure, Arterial Stiffness, and Heart Rate Variability in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Pilanee Vaithanomsat, Piyaporn Tumnark, Udomlak Sukatta, Phornpimon Janchai, Jatuporn Phoemsapthawee","doi":"10.4235/agmr.26.0125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arterial stiffness and impaired cardiac autonomic regulation contribute to cardiovascular risk in older adults. However, the cardiovascular effects of combining concurrent training with insect-derived protein supplementation remain unclear. This study examined the effects of concurrent training and hydrolyzed house cricket protein supplementation on blood pressure (BP), arterial stiffness, and heart rate variability (HRV) in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four older adults (64.7±5.8 years) completed the study and were included in the analysis: placebo (PLA), hydrolyzed house cricket protein supplementation alone (PRO), concurrent training with placebo supplementation (CT), or concurrent training plus hydrolyzed house cricket protein supplementation (PRO+CT). Exercise and supplementation were performed three times weekly for 12 weeks, with supplementation providing 30 g of hydrolyzed house cricket protein per session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant time × group interactions were observed for systolic BP (p=0.028), mean arterial pressure (MAP; p=0.031), rate-pressure product (RPP; p=0.002), resting heart rate (p=0.038), and RR interval (p=0.038). At post-intervention, MAP (p=0.012) and RPP (p=0.034) were lower in PRO+CT than in PLA, although PRO+CT did not differ significantly from CT or PRO. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity decreased over time (p<0.001), without a significant time × group interaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined intervention of concurrent training and hydrolyzed house cricket protein supplementation was associated with favorable changes in selected BP-related hemodynamic and resting cardiac measures in older adults but showed no clear additional cardiovascular benefit over either intervention alone. Changes in arterial stiffness and most HRV indices showed no clear intervention-specific effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.26.0125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arterial stiffness and impaired cardiac autonomic regulation contribute to cardiovascular risk in older adults. However, the cardiovascular effects of combining concurrent training with insect-derived protein supplementation remain unclear. This study examined the effects of concurrent training and hydrolyzed house cricket protein supplementation on blood pressure (BP), arterial stiffness, and heart rate variability (HRV) in older adults.

Methods: Forty-four older adults (64.7±5.8 years) completed the study and were included in the analysis: placebo (PLA), hydrolyzed house cricket protein supplementation alone (PRO), concurrent training with placebo supplementation (CT), or concurrent training plus hydrolyzed house cricket protein supplementation (PRO+CT). Exercise and supplementation were performed three times weekly for 12 weeks, with supplementation providing 30 g of hydrolyzed house cricket protein per session.

Results: Significant time × group interactions were observed for systolic BP (p=0.028), mean arterial pressure (MAP; p=0.031), rate-pressure product (RPP; p=0.002), resting heart rate (p=0.038), and RR interval (p=0.038). At post-intervention, MAP (p=0.012) and RPP (p=0.034) were lower in PRO+CT than in PLA, although PRO+CT did not differ significantly from CT or PRO. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity decreased over time (p<0.001), without a significant time × group interaction.

Conclusion: The combined intervention of concurrent training and hydrolyzed house cricket protein supplementation was associated with favorable changes in selected BP-related hemodynamic and resting cardiac measures in older adults but showed no clear additional cardiovascular benefit over either intervention alone. Changes in arterial stiffness and most HRV indices showed no clear intervention-specific effects.

同时训练加补充蟋蟀蛋白水解物对老年人血压、动脉硬度和心率变异性的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:动脉僵硬和心脏自主调节功能受损会增加老年人血压升高(BP)的心血管风险。然而,将同步训练与昆虫源性蛋白质补充相结合对心血管的影响尚不清楚。本研究考察了同时训练和补充水解蟋蟀蛋白对血压升高的老年人血压、动脉僵硬度和心率变异性(HRV)的影响。方法:45名老年人(64.7±5.8岁)随机分为安慰剂对照组(PLA)、单独补充水解蟋蟀蛋白组(PRO)、同时训练与安慰剂补充组(CT)、同时训练加补充水解蟋蟀蛋白组(PRO+CT)。锻炼组每周进行3次同时训练,持续12周,而补充组每天摄入30克水解蟋蟀蛋白。结果:收缩压在CT组、PRO组和PRO+CT组明显降低,而PLA组无明显降低。平均动脉压(MAP)和心率压积(RPP)表现出显著的时间×组相互作用,干预后PRO+CT的数值低于PLA。尽管没有观察到明显的时间-组相互作用,但随着时间的推移,肱-踝脉搏波速度显著下降。静息心率降低,RR间期增加,尤其是在运动组。几个HRV指数显示出显著的时间效应,而群体特异性反应通常不存在。结论:与安慰剂相比,同步训练联合补充水解蟋蟀蛋白可降低MAP和RPP。相反,动脉僵硬度和大多数HRV指数的变化主要与时间有关,而不是干预特异性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书