Five years after introduction of an opt-out consent system for organ donation; lessons learned from England and the Netherlands.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Transplant International Pub Date : 2026-09-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2026.16664
Nichon Esther Jansen, Tineke Jentina Wind, Martin B A Heemskerk, Aline C Hemke, Claire Williment, Sue Madden, Dale Gardiner
{"title":"Five years after introduction of an opt-out consent system for organ donation; lessons learned from England and the Netherlands.","authors":"Nichon Esther Jansen, Tineke Jentina Wind, Martin B A Heemskerk, Aline C Hemke, Claire Williment, Sue Madden, Dale Gardiner","doi":"10.3389/ti.2026.16664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Five years after changing from opt-in to opt-out consent systems in England and the Netherlands, we examine the impact on donor registrations, consent rates, donor numbers, and reflect on lessons learned. Opt-out legislation was implemented in May 2020 in England and July 2020 in the Netherlands. In England, 44% of the population is now registered; 40% recording an opt-in decision and 4% an opt-out decision. In the Netherlands, mandated donor registration resulted in the entire adult population having their decision recorded: \"Yes, I want to be a donor\" (34%), \"No objection\" (24%), or \"No, I don't want to be a donor\" (31%), while 11% leave the \"Decision to next of kin\". Despite these structural changes, the consent categories created by opt-out legislation (\"deemed\" consent in England and \"No objection\" in the Netherlands) remain challenging in practice, with fewer than 50% of families agreeing to donation. In England, the family consent rate declined from 69% to 57% between 2020 and 2025 and the donor numbers remain below pre-pandemic levels. In contrast, the Netherlands experienced a modest increase in family consent rates and donor numbers compared to the opt-in consent system. Opt-out legislation provides an important policy framework, but sustained system-level commitment remains essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"39 ","pages":"16664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13619534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2026.16664","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Five years after changing from opt-in to opt-out consent systems in England and the Netherlands, we examine the impact on donor registrations, consent rates, donor numbers, and reflect on lessons learned. Opt-out legislation was implemented in May 2020 in England and July 2020 in the Netherlands. In England, 44% of the population is now registered; 40% recording an opt-in decision and 4% an opt-out decision. In the Netherlands, mandated donor registration resulted in the entire adult population having their decision recorded: "Yes, I want to be a donor" (34%), "No objection" (24%), or "No, I don't want to be a donor" (31%), while 11% leave the "Decision to next of kin". Despite these structural changes, the consent categories created by opt-out legislation ("deemed" consent in England and "No objection" in the Netherlands) remain challenging in practice, with fewer than 50% of families agreeing to donation. In England, the family consent rate declined from 69% to 57% between 2020 and 2025 and the donor numbers remain below pre-pandemic levels. In contrast, the Netherlands experienced a modest increase in family consent rates and donor numbers compared to the opt-in consent system. Opt-out legislation provides an important policy framework, but sustained system-level commitment remains essential.

器官捐赠自愿退出同意制度实施5年后;英国和荷兰的经验教训。
在英国和荷兰同意制度从选择加入改为选择退出五年后,我们研究了对捐赠者登记、同意率、捐赠者数量的影响,并反思了经验教训。选择退出立法于2020年5月在英格兰实施,2020年7月在荷兰实施。在英格兰,44%的人口已经登记在册;40%记录选择加入的决定,4%记录选择退出的决定。在荷兰,强制性的捐赠者登记导致所有成年人的决定都被记录下来:“是的,我想成为一名捐赠者”(34%),“不反对”(24%),或“不,我不想成为一名捐赠者”(31%),而11%的人将“决定留给近亲”。尽管有这些结构性的改变,但在实践中,由选择退出立法创造的同意类别(在英格兰是“视为同意”,在荷兰是“不反对”)仍然具有挑战性,只有不到50%的家庭同意捐赠。在英格兰,家庭同意率在2020年至2025年间从69%降至57%,捐赠者数量仍低于大流行前的水平。相比之下,荷兰的家庭同意率和捐赠人数与自愿同意制度相比略有增加。选择退出立法提供了一个重要的政策框架,但持续的系统一级承诺仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书