Can Intraoperative Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Nodes be Abandoned in Early-stage Breast Cancer?

IF 0.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s13193-025-02520-4
Ogün Aydoğan, Erdem Barış Cartı, Muhammed Çağrı Coşkun, Ulaş Utku Şekerci, Akay Edizsoy
{"title":"Can Intraoperative Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Nodes be Abandoned in Early-stage Breast Cancer?","authors":"Ogün Aydoğan, Erdem Barış Cartı, Muhammed Çağrı Coşkun, Ulaş Utku Şekerci, Akay Edizsoy","doi":"10.1007/s13193-025-02520-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After the ACOSOG Z0011 study, the rate of axillary dissection(AD) decreased in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery(BCS). With the expansion of AD criteria in patients undergoing mastectomy in the NCCN 2025 guideline, intraoperative frozen section(iFS) analysis in early-stage breast cancer has become controversial. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of iFS analysis in patients with early-stage breast cancer and the adequacy of only permanent section analysis. iFS analysis was performed on 187 patients with node-negative early-stage breast cancer between March 2022 and December 2024. Clinically and radiologically node-negative T1-2 tumors with sentinel lymph node biopsy were included. Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent mastectomy and BCS were analyzed. Sentinel lymph node involvement rates and reoperation rates prevented by iFS analysis were reported. Of 187 patients with early-stage breast cancer, 64 underwent mastectomy and 123 underwent BCS with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Sentinel lymph node metastases were detected in 18.7% of the patients. More than two nodal metastases were detected in two of 187 patients (1.1%). More than two nodal metastases were not detected in patients who underwent mastectomy. Intraoperative frozen section analysis prevented reoperation for AD in 1.1% of all patients. The false-negative rate of iFS was 2.1%. No significant difference was detected between the AD rates between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.547). In early-stage breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary nodes, the benefit of iFS appears limited, selective rather than routine use of iFS may be appropriate and permanent section evaluation alone may be sufficient in most cases. Our findings may help avoid iFS analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":46707,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"17 9","pages":"2086-2091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13620001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-025-02520-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the ACOSOG Z0011 study, the rate of axillary dissection(AD) decreased in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery(BCS). With the expansion of AD criteria in patients undergoing mastectomy in the NCCN 2025 guideline, intraoperative frozen section(iFS) analysis in early-stage breast cancer has become controversial. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of iFS analysis in patients with early-stage breast cancer and the adequacy of only permanent section analysis. iFS analysis was performed on 187 patients with node-negative early-stage breast cancer between March 2022 and December 2024. Clinically and radiologically node-negative T1-2 tumors with sentinel lymph node biopsy were included. Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent mastectomy and BCS were analyzed. Sentinel lymph node involvement rates and reoperation rates prevented by iFS analysis were reported. Of 187 patients with early-stage breast cancer, 64 underwent mastectomy and 123 underwent BCS with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Sentinel lymph node metastases were detected in 18.7% of the patients. More than two nodal metastases were detected in two of 187 patients (1.1%). More than two nodal metastases were not detected in patients who underwent mastectomy. Intraoperative frozen section analysis prevented reoperation for AD in 1.1% of all patients. The false-negative rate of iFS was 2.1%. No significant difference was detected between the AD rates between the two groups (p = 0.547). In early-stage breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary nodes, the benefit of iFS appears limited, selective rather than routine use of iFS may be appropriate and permanent section evaluation alone may be sufficient in most cases. Our findings may help avoid iFS analysis.

早期乳腺癌可以放弃术中前哨淋巴结分析吗?
在ACOSOG Z0011研究之后,接受保乳手术(BCS)的患者腋窝夹层(AD)的发生率降低。随着NCCN 2025指南中乳腺切除术患者AD标准的扩大,术中冷冻切片(iFS)分析在早期乳腺癌中的应用已成为争议。本研究旨在评估iFS分析在早期乳腺癌患者中的可行性,以及仅永久切片分析的充分性。在2022年3月至2024年12月期间,对187例淋巴结阴性早期乳腺癌患者进行了iFS分析。包括临床和影像学淋巴结阴性的T1-2肿瘤,前哨淋巴结活检。对行乳腺切除术和BCS患者的临床病理资料进行分析。报告了iFS分析预防前哨淋巴结受累率和再手术率。187例早期乳腺癌患者中,64例行乳房切除术,123例行BCS伴前哨淋巴结活检。18.7%的患者发现前哨淋巴结转移。187例患者中有2例(1.1%)存在2个以上淋巴结转移。在接受乳房切除术的患者中未发现两个以上的淋巴结转移。术中冰冻切片分析防止了1.1%的AD患者再次手术。iFS假阴性率为2.1%。两组AD发生率无显著性差异(p = 0.547)。在临床阴性腋窝淋巴结的早期乳腺癌患者中,iFS的益处似乎有限,选择性而非常规使用iFS可能是合适的,在大多数情况下,单独进行永久性切片评估可能就足够了。我们的发现可能有助于避免iFS分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to encourage and promote clinical and research activities pertaining to Surgical Oncology. It also aims to bring in the concept of multidisciplinary team approach in management of various cancers. The Journal would publish original article, point of technique, review article, case report, letter to editor, profiles of eminent teachers, surgeons and instititions - a short (up to 500 words) of the Cancer Institutions, departments, and oncologist, who founded new departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书