[Evaluation of an introductory course on research methodology for healthcare trainees: ten years of experience and curricular adaptations]

Q3 Medicine
María Lourdes Posadas Martínez, Silvina Dell'Era, Marcelina Carretero, Sergio Adrián Terrasa
{"title":"[Evaluation of an introductory course on research methodology for healthcare trainees: ten years of experience and curricular adaptations]","authors":"María Lourdes Posadas Martínez, Silvina Dell'Era, Marcelina Carretero, Sergio Adrián Terrasa","doi":"10.31053/1853.0605.v83.n3.49658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Critical biomedical reading is essential in the training of health professionals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Narrate a decade of experience in the redesign and implementation of an introductory course on research methodology for health residents and fellows at a University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The objective of the course is to acquire skills for critical reading and tools to plan research projects. The educational model evolved from face-to-face meetings and theoretical classes (2015-2018) to synchronous online (2019-2021) and finally to asynchronous online (2022-2024), incorporating new technological and hypermedia resources, offering greater flexibility and autonomy to the student. The type of evaluation was also modified, from individual multiple-choice and oral exams in small groups, with presentations on critical reading of biomedical literature, to a similar but synchronous format. Finally, they were replaced by individual activities with automatic feedback and an asynchronous activity in small groups where the analysis of the clinical research article is accompanied by questions that guide its interpretation, with personalized feedback. At the end of the course, a survey was sent to the participants to collect feedback and make continuous improvements to the program.</p><p><p>1,073 participants were included, 66.1% women. There were no changes in the composition of the cohorts (sex and type of residence), 87.1% (95% CI 84.9 to 89.1%) completed and passed the course. An increasing and statistically significant trend was observed in the proportion of approved students from the 2015-2018 cohort to the 2022-2024 cohort (p < 0.001). The sustained increase in participants who completed and passed the course with the passing of the cohorts and the high satisfaction of the participants demonstrate the effectiveness of the methodological adaptations.</p>","PeriodicalId":38814,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas de Cordoba","volume":"83 3","pages":"e49658"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas de Cordoba","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v83.n3.49658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Critical biomedical reading is essential in the training of health professionals.

Objectives: Narrate a decade of experience in the redesign and implementation of an introductory course on research methodology for health residents and fellows at a University Hospital.

Methodology: The objective of the course is to acquire skills for critical reading and tools to plan research projects. The educational model evolved from face-to-face meetings and theoretical classes (2015-2018) to synchronous online (2019-2021) and finally to asynchronous online (2022-2024), incorporating new technological and hypermedia resources, offering greater flexibility and autonomy to the student. The type of evaluation was also modified, from individual multiple-choice and oral exams in small groups, with presentations on critical reading of biomedical literature, to a similar but synchronous format. Finally, they were replaced by individual activities with automatic feedback and an asynchronous activity in small groups where the analysis of the clinical research article is accompanied by questions that guide its interpretation, with personalized feedback. At the end of the course, a survey was sent to the participants to collect feedback and make continuous improvements to the program.

1,073 participants were included, 66.1% women. There were no changes in the composition of the cohorts (sex and type of residence), 87.1% (95% CI 84.9 to 89.1%) completed and passed the course. An increasing and statistically significant trend was observed in the proportion of approved students from the 2015-2018 cohort to the 2022-2024 cohort (p < 0.001). The sustained increase in participants who completed and passed the course with the passing of the cohorts and the high satisfaction of the participants demonstrate the effectiveness of the methodological adaptations.

评估专业住院医师的研究方法入门课程。
简介:生物医学批判性阅读是卫生专业人员培训的基础。目的:讲述大学医院住院医师和健康研究员重新设计和实施研究方法论入门课程的十年经验。方法论:本课程的目的是获得批判性阅读技能和研究项目规划工具。教育模式从面对面会议和理论课(2015-2018年)发展到同步在线(2019-2021年),最后发展到异步在线(2022-2024年),结合了新的技术和超媒体资源,为学生提供了更大的灵活性和自主权。评估的类型也发生了变化,从多选择的个人考试和小组口试,以及关于生物医学文献批判性阅读的演示,到类似但同步的格式。最后,它们被带有自动反馈的个人活动和小团体的异步活动所取代,在小团体中,对临床研究论文的分析伴随着带有个性化反馈的指导问题。在课程结束时,我们会向学员发送一份调查问卷,以收集反馈,并不断改进课程。结果与结论:包括1073名参与者,66.1%为女性。队列的组成(性别和居住类型)没有变化,87.1% (95% CI 84.9 - 89.1%)完成并通过了课程。从2015-2018年队列到2022-2024年队列(p < 0.001),通过和具有统计学意义的比例呈上升趋势。随着队列的通过,完成和通过课程的参与者稳步增加,以及参与者的高满意度,证明了方法调整的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Faculty of Medical Sciences is a scientific publication of the Secretariat of Science and Technology of the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the National University of Cordoba. Its objective is to disseminate and promote research work related to Medical and Biological Sciences. It publishes scientific works of national and international professionals on different topics related to health sciences from the field of medicine, nursing, kinesiology, diagnostic imaging, phonoaudiology, nutrition, public health, chemical sciences, dentistry and related.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书