Brainstem size in extremely preterm infants: reference values and association with neurodevelopmental outcomes.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Julia Buchmayer, Paul Zeugswetter, Renate Fuiko, Gregor Kasprian, Vito Giordano, Katrin Klebermaß-Schrehof, Victor Schmidbauer, Sophie Stummer, Angelika Berger, Katharina Goeral
{"title":"Brainstem size in extremely preterm infants: reference values and association with neurodevelopmental outcomes.","authors":"Julia Buchmayer, Paul Zeugswetter, Renate Fuiko, Gregor Kasprian, Vito Giordano, Katrin Klebermaß-Schrehof, Victor Schmidbauer, Sophie Stummer, Angelika Berger, Katharina Goeral","doi":"10.1038/s41390-026-05529-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Extremely preterm infants are at high risk for neurodevelopmental impairment. The brainstem plays a critical role in early development. This study aimed to establish reference values for two-dimensional brainstem measurements on cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) at term-equivalent age (TEA), assess the impact of severe neonatal brain injury, and examine associations with neurodevelopment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, preterm infants underwent routine cMRI at TEA. Standardized midsagittal brainstem measurements were obtained. Reference values and z-scores were derived from infants without severe brain injury (high-grade IVH, CBH, or cystic WMI). In the reference cohort, associations with Bayley-III outcomes at 2 years' corrected age were evaluated using multivariable regression. Brainstem z-scores were compared between infants with and without severe brain injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reference values were established for 242 infants born between 22 + 1 and 27 + 6 weeks' gestation. Brainstem size increased with gestational age and was significantly smaller in infants with severe brain injury. Higher brainstem z-scores were independently associated with better cognitive (adjusted β = 3.56, 95% CI: 0.44-6.69) and motor (adjusted β = 2.80, 95% CI: 0.39-5.22) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brainstem size was associated with neonatal brain injury and later neurodevelopment, supporting its potential as a clinically applicable cMRI biomarker in extremely preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Reference values and z-scores for two-dimensional brainstem measurements at term-equivalent age in extremely preterm infants without severe brain injury. Reduced brainstem size in infants with severe brain injury, and association with cognitive and motor outcomes at 2 years' corrected age. Brainstem size is a simple and reproducible MRI biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-026-05529-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Extremely preterm infants are at high risk for neurodevelopmental impairment. The brainstem plays a critical role in early development. This study aimed to establish reference values for two-dimensional brainstem measurements on cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) at term-equivalent age (TEA), assess the impact of severe neonatal brain injury, and examine associations with neurodevelopment.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, preterm infants underwent routine cMRI at TEA. Standardized midsagittal brainstem measurements were obtained. Reference values and z-scores were derived from infants without severe brain injury (high-grade IVH, CBH, or cystic WMI). In the reference cohort, associations with Bayley-III outcomes at 2 years' corrected age were evaluated using multivariable regression. Brainstem z-scores were compared between infants with and without severe brain injury.

Results: Reference values were established for 242 infants born between 22 + 1 and 27 + 6 weeks' gestation. Brainstem size increased with gestational age and was significantly smaller in infants with severe brain injury. Higher brainstem z-scores were independently associated with better cognitive (adjusted β = 3.56, 95% CI: 0.44-6.69) and motor (adjusted β = 2.80, 95% CI: 0.39-5.22) outcomes.

Conclusions: Brainstem size was associated with neonatal brain injury and later neurodevelopment, supporting its potential as a clinically applicable cMRI biomarker in extremely preterm infants.

Impact: Reference values and z-scores for two-dimensional brainstem measurements at term-equivalent age in extremely preterm infants without severe brain injury. Reduced brainstem size in infants with severe brain injury, and association with cognitive and motor outcomes at 2 years' corrected age. Brainstem size is a simple and reproducible MRI biomarker.

极早产儿脑干大小:参考值及其与神经发育结局的关系。
背景和目的:极早产儿是神经发育障碍的高危人群。脑干在早期发育中起着关键作用。本研究旨在建立足月等效年龄(TEA)时脑磁共振成像(cMRI)二维脑干测量的参考值,评估严重新生儿脑损伤的影响,并研究其与神经发育的关系。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,早产儿在TEA接受常规cMRI检查。获得标准化的正中矢状脑干测量。参考值和z评分来源于没有严重脑损伤(高级别IVH、CBH或囊性WMI)的婴儿。在参考队列中,使用多变量回归评估与2岁校正年龄Bayley-III结局的关联。比较有和无严重脑损伤婴儿的脑干z分数。结果:242例妊娠22 + 1 ~ 27 + 6周的新生儿均建立了参考值。脑干大小随胎龄增大,严重脑损伤婴儿的脑干明显变小。较高的脑干z分数与较好的认知(调整后的β = 3.56, 95% CI: 0.44-6.69)和运动(调整后的β = 2.80, 95% CI: 0.39-5.22)结果独立相关。结论:脑干大小与新生儿脑损伤和后期神经发育相关,支持其作为极早产儿临床应用的cMRI生物标志物的潜力。影响:无严重脑损伤的极早产儿足月等值年龄二维脑干测量的参考值和z分数。重度脑损伤婴儿脑干大小减小与矫正年龄2岁时认知和运动结果的关系脑干大小是一种简单、可重复的MRI生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书