Effect of Single-Segment versus Two-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation on Postoperative Sagittal Balance and Cranial Adjacent Segment Disease in L4-L5 Spondylolisthesis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-30 DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_55_26
R Acikalin, M Ferat, C Sezer, I Istemen, M Harput, D Babaoglan
{"title":"Effect of Single-Segment versus Two-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation on Postoperative Sagittal Balance and Cranial Adjacent Segment Disease in L4-L5 Spondylolisthesis.","authors":"R Acikalin, M Ferat, C Sezer, I Istemen, M Harput, D Babaoglan","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_55_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effects of single-segment versus two-segment pedicle screw fixation on adjacent segment disease (ASDis) and lumbar sagittal balance in patients with L4-L5 spondylolisthesis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 35 patients who underwent lumbar fusion for L4-L5 spondylolisthesis between January 2020 and January 2025. Patients were divided into single-segment (SS) and two-segment (TS) groups: SS (L4-L5 fusion, n = 19) and TS (L3-L4-L5 fusion, n = 16). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological parameters, including lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and sacral slope (SCS), were measured. Adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) was evaluated using Modified Pfirrmann Grades. The follow-up period was 6 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores postoperatively. At 6-month follow-up, the TS group demonstrated greater improvement (VAS: P =0.028; ODI: P =0.042). The SS group exhibited higher Pfirrmann scores, indicating greater ASDeg, compared to the TS group ( P < 0.05). The TS group showed better restoration of LL and SVA at final follow-up, though differences were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both single-segment and two-segment fixation improve clinical and radiological outcomes in L4-L5 spondylolisthesis. However, two-segment fixation offers advantages in preventing adjacent-segment degeneration and maintaining radiographic parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":19431,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"29 9","pages":"966-972"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_55_26","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effects of single-segment versus two-segment pedicle screw fixation on adjacent segment disease (ASDis) and lumbar sagittal balance in patients with L4-L5 spondylolisthesis.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 35 patients who underwent lumbar fusion for L4-L5 spondylolisthesis between January 2020 and January 2025. Patients were divided into single-segment (SS) and two-segment (TS) groups: SS (L4-L5 fusion, n = 19) and TS (L3-L4-L5 fusion, n = 16). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological parameters, including lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and sacral slope (SCS), were measured. Adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) was evaluated using Modified Pfirrmann Grades. The follow-up period was 6 months postoperatively.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores postoperatively. At 6-month follow-up, the TS group demonstrated greater improvement (VAS: P =0.028; ODI: P =0.042). The SS group exhibited higher Pfirrmann scores, indicating greater ASDeg, compared to the TS group ( P < 0.05). The TS group showed better restoration of LL and SVA at final follow-up, though differences were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Both single-segment and two-segment fixation improve clinical and radiological outcomes in L4-L5 spondylolisthesis. However, two-segment fixation offers advantages in preventing adjacent-segment degeneration and maintaining radiographic parameters.

单节段与双节段椎弓根螺钉固定对L4-L5椎体滑脱术后矢状位平衡和颅邻段病变的影响。
目的:评价单节段与双节段椎弓根螺钉固定对L4-L5椎体滑脱患者邻节段病变(ASDis)及腰椎矢状位平衡的影响。材料和方法:本回顾性研究包括35例在2020年1月至2025年1月间因L4-L5腰椎滑脱行腰椎融合术的患者。患者分为单节段(SS)组和两节段(TS)组:SS组(L4-L5融合,n = 19)和TS组(L3-L4-L5融合,n = 16)。临床结果采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)进行评估。测量放射学参数,包括腰椎前凸(LL)、矢状垂直轴(SVA)和骶骨斜率(SCS)。邻段退变(ASDeg)采用改良Pfirrmann分级进行评价。术后随访6个月。结果:两组术后VAS、ODI评分均有明显改善。随访6个月时,TS组改善明显(VAS: P =0.028; ODI: P =0.042)。与TS组相比,SS组Pfirrmann评分较高,ASDeg显著升高(P < 0.05)。TS组最终随访时LL和SVA恢复较好,但差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:单节段和双节段固定均可改善L4-L5椎体滑脱的临床和影像学结果。然而,两节段内固定在防止邻近节段退变和维持影像学参数方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice is a Monthly peer-reviewed international journal published by the Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria. The journal’s full text is available online at www.njcponline.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal makes a token charge for submission, processing and publication of manuscripts including color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书