Evaluation of Paramedic Pre-hospital's Analgesic Management of Trauma Patients.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-30 DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_633_25
Y Kantar, S Hayme
{"title":"Evaluation of Paramedic Pre-hospital's Analgesic Management of Trauma Patients.","authors":"Y Kantar, S Hayme","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_633_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although analgesic management is a critical priority in the guidelines for trauma patients, paramedics' prehospital administration practices vary.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the paramedics' practices regarding prehospital analgesia administration in trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the records of patients 18 years and above who were brought to our hospital via ambulance were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 506 patients with trauma were included in this phase of the study. In the second phase, paramedics' practices regarding pre-hospital analgesic administration to trauma patients, such as drugs, and frequency. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and are presented as mean ± standard deviation for numerical variables and as frequency and percentage for nominal variables. Nominal variables were evaluated using the Pearson Chi-Square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to data collected retrospectively in the first phase of the study, prehospital analgesia was administered to only 1% of the 506 patients. In the second phase of the study, when asked about the reasons for not administering prehospital analgesia, it was found that 77.5% of paramedics believed that doing so would interfere with the hospital physician's examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High rates of interventions such as spinal board immobilization, cervical collar application, and appropriate splinting or dressing have been observed in trauma patients. Paramedics were also found to be quite successful in establishing intravenous access. However, the rates of fluid administration and analgesia were considerably lower compared to the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":19431,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"29 9","pages":"1079-1086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_633_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although analgesic management is a critical priority in the guidelines for trauma patients, paramedics' prehospital administration practices vary.

Objectives: This study evaluated the paramedics' practices regarding prehospital analgesia administration in trauma patients.

Methods: The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the records of patients 18 years and above who were brought to our hospital via ambulance were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 506 patients with trauma were included in this phase of the study. In the second phase, paramedics' practices regarding pre-hospital analgesic administration to trauma patients, such as drugs, and frequency. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and are presented as mean ± standard deviation for numerical variables and as frequency and percentage for nominal variables. Nominal variables were evaluated using the Pearson Chi-Square test.

Results: According to data collected retrospectively in the first phase of the study, prehospital analgesia was administered to only 1% of the 506 patients. In the second phase of the study, when asked about the reasons for not administering prehospital analgesia, it was found that 77.5% of paramedics believed that doing so would interfere with the hospital physician's examination.

Conclusion: High rates of interventions such as spinal board immobilization, cervical collar application, and appropriate splinting or dressing have been observed in trauma patients. Paramedics were also found to be quite successful in establishing intravenous access. However, the rates of fluid administration and analgesia were considerably lower compared to the literature.

院前护理人员对创伤患者镇痛管理的评价。
背景:虽然在创伤患者的指导方针中,镇痛管理是一个关键的优先事项,但护理人员院前给药的做法各不相同。目的:本研究评估护理人员对创伤患者院前镇痛的做法。方法:研究分两期进行。在第一阶段,回顾性回顾了18岁及以上通过救护车送到我院的患者的记录。共有506名创伤患者被纳入这一阶段的研究。在第二阶段,护理人员关于院前给创伤患者止痛的做法,如药物,和频率。数据采用描述性统计进行分析,数值变量以平均值±标准差表示,名义变量以频率和百分比表示。名义变量采用皮尔逊卡方检验进行评估。结果:根据第一期回顾性收集的数据,506例患者中只有1%的患者院前镇痛。在研究的第二阶段,当被问及不进行院前镇痛的原因时,发现77.5%的护理人员认为这样做会干扰医院医生的检查。结论:脊髓板固定、颈套应用、适当夹板或敷料等干预措施在创伤患者中的应用率较高。护理人员还发现在建立静脉注射通道方面相当成功。然而,与文献相比,液体给药和镇痛的比率要低得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice is a Monthly peer-reviewed international journal published by the Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria. The journal’s full text is available online at www.njcponline.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal makes a token charge for submission, processing and publication of manuscripts including color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书