Jamal Hasoon, Jenna Chuan, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits
{"title":"Clinical Responses to Cocaine-Positive Urine Drug Screens in Patients Receiving Chronic Opioid Therapy: A Four-Patient Case Series.","authors":"Jamal Hasoon, Jenna Chuan, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits","doi":"10.52965/001c.171215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urine drug screening (UDS) is commonly incorporated into the monitoring of patients receiving chronic opioid therapy for noncancer pain. Detection of an illicit substance such as cocaine creates a challenging clinical situation because continuation of full µ-opioid agonist therapy may carry increased risk, while abrupt or reflexive discontinuation may also have unintended consequences. There is limited literature describing how clinicians modify chronic opioid therapy following cocaine-positive UDS results.</p><p><strong>Case series: </strong>We describe four patients receiving chronic opioid therapy who were found to have cocaine-positive UDS results. Two patients receiving hydrocodone/acetaminophen were gradually weaned from opioid therapy and opioids were subsequently discontinued. A third patient receiving hydrocodone/acetaminophen was transitioned to buprenorphine/naloxone 2 mg twice daily as an alternative to continued full agonist opioid therapy. A fourth patient with a history of substance misuse and prior spine surgery was offered transition to buprenorphine/naloxone but declined and elected not to continue care with the practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cocaine-positive UDS results may substantially alter chronic opioid prescribing. Management may include increased monitoring, gradual discontinuation of full agonist opioids, or consideration of buprenorphine-based therapy in appropriately selected patients. These cases emphasize the importance of individualized risk assessment rather than a uniform response to an unexpected UDS result.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"18 ","pages":"171215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.171215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Urine drug screening (UDS) is commonly incorporated into the monitoring of patients receiving chronic opioid therapy for noncancer pain. Detection of an illicit substance such as cocaine creates a challenging clinical situation because continuation of full µ-opioid agonist therapy may carry increased risk, while abrupt or reflexive discontinuation may also have unintended consequences. There is limited literature describing how clinicians modify chronic opioid therapy following cocaine-positive UDS results.
Case series: We describe four patients receiving chronic opioid therapy who were found to have cocaine-positive UDS results. Two patients receiving hydrocodone/acetaminophen were gradually weaned from opioid therapy and opioids were subsequently discontinued. A third patient receiving hydrocodone/acetaminophen was transitioned to buprenorphine/naloxone 2 mg twice daily as an alternative to continued full agonist opioid therapy. A fourth patient with a history of substance misuse and prior spine surgery was offered transition to buprenorphine/naloxone but declined and elected not to continue care with the practice.
Conclusion: Cocaine-positive UDS results may substantially alter chronic opioid prescribing. Management may include increased monitoring, gradual discontinuation of full agonist opioids, or consideration of buprenorphine-based therapy in appropriately selected patients. These cases emphasize the importance of individualized risk assessment rather than a uniform response to an unexpected UDS result.
期刊介绍:
Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.