Combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
{"title":"Combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Anas R Alashram","doi":"10.1007/s10072-026-09437-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Upper limb impairments are among the most prevalent consequences of stroke. Recently, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and mirror therapy (MT) have been used in stroke rehabilitation. This systematic review aims to examine the effects of combining rTMS and MT on the upper limb in patients with stroke and define the optimal treatment parameters, if possible. \"PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PEDro, EMBASE, REHABDATA, and Web of Science\" were searched until March 2026. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of combined rTMS and MT on the upper limb poststroke were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) and the GRADE were employed to evaluate risk of bias and certainty of evidence, respectively. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. Seven RCTs (402 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Significant improvements in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) (SMD = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.43-1.41, p = 0.0002) and the Box and Block Test (BBT) (SMD = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.49-1.68, p = 0.0003) were reported. Other outcomes demonstrated improvements in pinch grip, hand grip, functional performance, motor impairment, and muscle tone. The preliminary findings suggest that combining rTMS and MT has potential effects on enhancing upper limb function poststroke; however, these results should be interpreted with caution. The most effective treatment parameters remain unclear. Further high-quality studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":"47 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-026-09437-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Upper limb impairments are among the most prevalent consequences of stroke. Recently, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and mirror therapy (MT) have been used in stroke rehabilitation. This systematic review aims to examine the effects of combining rTMS and MT on the upper limb in patients with stroke and define the optimal treatment parameters, if possible. "PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PEDro, EMBASE, REHABDATA, and Web of Science" were searched until March 2026. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of combined rTMS and MT on the upper limb poststroke were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) and the GRADE were employed to evaluate risk of bias and certainty of evidence, respectively. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. Seven RCTs (402 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Significant improvements in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) (SMD = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.43-1.41, p = 0.0002) and the Box and Block Test (BBT) (SMD = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.49-1.68, p = 0.0003) were reported. Other outcomes demonstrated improvements in pinch grip, hand grip, functional performance, motor impairment, and muscle tone. The preliminary findings suggest that combining rTMS and MT has potential effects on enhancing upper limb function poststroke; however, these results should be interpreted with caution. The most effective treatment parameters remain unclear. Further high-quality studies are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.