Under Pressure and Underrecognized: The Role of Social Workers and Case Managers in Screening for Social Determinants of Health in the United States.

IF 2.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2026-09-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.2234
Melissa L Habrat, Lindsay D Nelson, David A Nelson
{"title":"Under Pressure and Underrecognized: The Role of Social Workers and Case Managers in Screening for Social Determinants of Health in the United States.","authors":"Melissa L Habrat, Lindsay D Nelson, David A Nelson","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.2234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social determinants of health (SDOH) screening is increasingly embedded in clinical care, yet the work of asking, documenting, and responding to social needs often falls to social workers and nurses or professional case managers who operate under significant time, staffing, and system constraints. We conducted a narrative review to examine how SDOH influence outcomes, identify systemic and emotional barriers to effective screening, and synthesize evidence-informed strategies that support implementation. Across included sources, findings clustered into three domains: challenges in integrating screening (policy and accreditation pressure, staffing and resource constraints, EHR documentation and interoperability limits, closed-loop referral and cross-sector partnership gaps, and training and role ambiguity), the emotional and professional toll (burnout, moral distress, and compassion fatigue, amplified by repeated identification of needs without reliable pathways to act), and trust and data accuracy (relational conditions for disclosure and how privacy, stigma, and documentation concerns shape data quality and downstream action). Promising practices emphasized clear communication about the purpose of screening, nonjudgmental and culturally responsive approaches, team-based workflows with role clarity, usable documentation processes, and referral infrastructure capable of follow-through. Overall, SDOH screening is advancing faster than workforce capacity and systems can respond, underscoring the need for investments that align expectations with actionable care pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":"13 3","pages":"126-133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13623025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social determinants of health (SDOH) screening is increasingly embedded in clinical care, yet the work of asking, documenting, and responding to social needs often falls to social workers and nurses or professional case managers who operate under significant time, staffing, and system constraints. We conducted a narrative review to examine how SDOH influence outcomes, identify systemic and emotional barriers to effective screening, and synthesize evidence-informed strategies that support implementation. Across included sources, findings clustered into three domains: challenges in integrating screening (policy and accreditation pressure, staffing and resource constraints, EHR documentation and interoperability limits, closed-loop referral and cross-sector partnership gaps, and training and role ambiguity), the emotional and professional toll (burnout, moral distress, and compassion fatigue, amplified by repeated identification of needs without reliable pathways to act), and trust and data accuracy (relational conditions for disclosure and how privacy, stigma, and documentation concerns shape data quality and downstream action). Promising practices emphasized clear communication about the purpose of screening, nonjudgmental and culturally responsive approaches, team-based workflows with role clarity, usable documentation processes, and referral infrastructure capable of follow-through. Overall, SDOH screening is advancing faster than workforce capacity and systems can respond, underscoring the need for investments that align expectations with actionable care pathways.

压力下和未被认识:社会工作者和个案管理人员在筛选健康的社会决定因素在美国的作用。
健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)筛查越来越多地嵌入到临床护理中,然而,询问、记录和响应社会需求的工作往往落在社会工作者和护士或专业病例管理人员的身上,他们在大量的时间、人员和系统限制下工作。我们进行了一项叙述性综述,以研究SDOH如何影响结果,确定有效筛查的系统和情感障碍,并综合支持实施的循证战略。在包括的来源中,研究结果集中在三个领域:整合筛查方面的挑战(政策和认证压力、人员配备和资源限制、电子病历文件和互操作性限制、闭环转诊和跨部门伙伴关系差距、培训和角色模糊)、情感和专业损失(倦怠、道德困扰和同情疲劳,由于反复确定需求而没有可靠的行动途径而放大)、信任和数据准确性(披露的关系条件以及隐私如何、污名和文档关系到形状数据质量和下游行动)。有希望的实践强调关于筛选目的的清晰沟通,非判断和文化响应方法,基于团队的工作流程,角色明确,可用的文档过程,以及能够跟进的转诊基础设施。总体而言,SDOH筛查的发展速度超过了劳动力能力和系统的响应能力,这突显了投资的必要性,以使期望与可操作的护理途径保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书