C Di Franco, J Menard, A Romero, S Chalhoub, V Madden, S R Boysen
{"title":"Veterinary point-of-care ultrasound probe orientation and location for detection of pleural effusion in canine cadavers: a pilot study.","authors":"C Di Franco, J Menard, A Romero, S Chalhoub, V Madden, S R Boysen","doi":"10.1111/jsap.70196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate whether point-of-care ultrasound probe location (at or below the costochondral junction) and probe orientation (perpendicular or parallel to the ribs) affect operator ability to detect pleural effusion in a canine cadaver model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twelve intubated canine cadavers with scant to large volume pleural effusion were scanned in sternal recumbency while receiving positive pressure ventilation. Twelve operators (2 emergency and critical care specialists, 2 veterinary students and 8 interns) performed blinded bilateral thoracic point-of-care ultrasound using two randomised scanning protocols: a modified TFAST for pleural fluid technique and a modified Calgary PLUS for pleural fluid technique. Hemithoraces were categorised as scant-to-mild or moderate-to-large effusion for statistical analysis. Paired detection rates were compared using McNemar's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall detection of pleural effusion was significantly higher using the modified Calgary PLUS for pleural fluid technique compared with the modified TFAST for pleural fluid technique (89.1% vs. 60.9%; P < .001). There was a statistically significant increase in the detection of scant-to-mild effusion with the modified Calgary PLUS for pleural fluid technique (84.4% vs. 37.5%; P < .001). No significant difference was observed for moderate-to-large effusions (93.8% vs. 84.4%; P = .25).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The site assessed and probe orientation used with different thoracic point-of-care ultrasound protocols can influence the operator's ability to detect pleural effusion in positive pressure ventilation canine cadavers placed in sternal recumbency. Incorporating a probe orientation that is parallel to the ribs in the more ventral regions of the thorax during point-of-care ultrasound may improve the operator's detection of pleural effusions, particularly when smaller volumes of pleural fluid are present.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.70196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate whether point-of-care ultrasound probe location (at or below the costochondral junction) and probe orientation (perpendicular or parallel to the ribs) affect operator ability to detect pleural effusion in a canine cadaver model.
Materials and methods: Twelve intubated canine cadavers with scant to large volume pleural effusion were scanned in sternal recumbency while receiving positive pressure ventilation. Twelve operators (2 emergency and critical care specialists, 2 veterinary students and 8 interns) performed blinded bilateral thoracic point-of-care ultrasound using two randomised scanning protocols: a modified TFAST for pleural fluid technique and a modified Calgary PLUS for pleural fluid technique. Hemithoraces were categorised as scant-to-mild or moderate-to-large effusion for statistical analysis. Paired detection rates were compared using McNemar's test.
Results: Overall detection of pleural effusion was significantly higher using the modified Calgary PLUS for pleural fluid technique compared with the modified TFAST for pleural fluid technique (89.1% vs. 60.9%; P < .001). There was a statistically significant increase in the detection of scant-to-mild effusion with the modified Calgary PLUS for pleural fluid technique (84.4% vs. 37.5%; P < .001). No significant difference was observed for moderate-to-large effusions (93.8% vs. 84.4%; P = .25).
Clinical significance: The site assessed and probe orientation used with different thoracic point-of-care ultrasound protocols can influence the operator's ability to detect pleural effusion in positive pressure ventilation canine cadavers placed in sternal recumbency. Incorporating a probe orientation that is parallel to the ribs in the more ventral regions of the thorax during point-of-care ultrasound may improve the operator's detection of pleural effusions, particularly when smaller volumes of pleural fluid are present.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery.
In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world.
The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher.
The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association