Effect of Nebulizer Breath-Guiding on Breathing Patterns and Lung Deposition.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Benjamin Heine, Uwe Schuschnig, Jakob Richter, Andreas Liebl, Lea Botermann, Gesa Bräunlich, Nicolas Schwenck, Maximilian J Grill, Michael Hahn
{"title":"Effect of Nebulizer Breath-Guiding on Breathing Patterns and Lung Deposition.","authors":"Benjamin Heine, Uwe Schuschnig, Jakob Richter, Andreas Liebl, Lea Botermann, Gesa Bräunlich, Nicolas Schwenck, Maximilian J Grill, Michael Hahn","doi":"10.1177/19412711261488960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Efficient aerosol therapy depends on both device performance and inhalation technique. Breath-triggered vibrating mesh nebulizers reduce drug loss by generating aerosol only during inspiration but may prolong treatment. Guiding patients toward slow, deep breathing could improve lung deposition and shorten nebulization time, yet quantitative evidence, particularly across disease groups, remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how integrated breath-guiding features influence breathing behavior, lung deposition, and user perception in healthy adults and in patients with obstructive or restrictive lung disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-four participants inhaled through three nebulizer configurations: a low-resistance reference (eFlow OS) and two versions of the eFlow Integrated featuring direction-dependent resistance and multimodal feedback, tested with or without a breath-guiding app. Flow signals from multiple breaths were analyzed to determine phase-averaged breathing parameters. Device effects were evaluated by ANOVA. Representative breathing patterns and unsteady aerosol characteristics were input to a validated whole-lung <i>in silico</i> model to estimate deposition. User experience was assessed by questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Breath-guiding consistently altered inhalation behavior. Peak inspiratory flow decreased by ∼20%, the I/E ratio increased by >15%, and with the breath guide app, tidal volume (+40%) and breath duration (+47%) increased. These effects were similar across disease groups. <i>In silico</i> simulations showed improved delivery with guided inhalation: lung drug deposition rate increased by 3.7% and 15.5%, and alveolar deposited mass fraction rose by 66% and 76% versus the reference. The breath guide app further shifted deposition from extrathoracic to thoracic and alveolar regions and reduced exhalation losses (-14%). Most participants (88%) were satisfied or very satisfied, citing pleasant resistance and helpful app guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breath-guiding features and digital coaching reliably promote slower, deeper breathing, leading to greater lung and alveolar deposition and shorter expected nebulization times. High user acceptance underscores the clinical potential of patient-centric, guided inhalation in optimizing aerosol therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":"19412711261488960"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711261488960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Efficient aerosol therapy depends on both device performance and inhalation technique. Breath-triggered vibrating mesh nebulizers reduce drug loss by generating aerosol only during inspiration but may prolong treatment. Guiding patients toward slow, deep breathing could improve lung deposition and shorten nebulization time, yet quantitative evidence, particularly across disease groups, remains limited.

Objective: To assess how integrated breath-guiding features influence breathing behavior, lung deposition, and user perception in healthy adults and in patients with obstructive or restrictive lung disease.

Methods: Sixty-four participants inhaled through three nebulizer configurations: a low-resistance reference (eFlow OS) and two versions of the eFlow Integrated featuring direction-dependent resistance and multimodal feedback, tested with or without a breath-guiding app. Flow signals from multiple breaths were analyzed to determine phase-averaged breathing parameters. Device effects were evaluated by ANOVA. Representative breathing patterns and unsteady aerosol characteristics were input to a validated whole-lung in silico model to estimate deposition. User experience was assessed by questionnaire.

Results: Breath-guiding consistently altered inhalation behavior. Peak inspiratory flow decreased by ∼20%, the I/E ratio increased by >15%, and with the breath guide app, tidal volume (+40%) and breath duration (+47%) increased. These effects were similar across disease groups. In silico simulations showed improved delivery with guided inhalation: lung drug deposition rate increased by 3.7% and 15.5%, and alveolar deposited mass fraction rose by 66% and 76% versus the reference. The breath guide app further shifted deposition from extrathoracic to thoracic and alveolar regions and reduced exhalation losses (-14%). Most participants (88%) were satisfied or very satisfied, citing pleasant resistance and helpful app guidance.

Conclusion: Breath-guiding features and digital coaching reliably promote slower, deeper breathing, leading to greater lung and alveolar deposition and shorter expected nebulization times. High user acceptance underscores the clinical potential of patient-centric, guided inhalation in optimizing aerosol therapy.

雾化器呼吸引导对呼吸方式及肺沉积的影响。
背景:有效的气雾剂治疗取决于装置性能和吸入技术。呼吸触发振动网状喷雾器通过仅在吸入时产生气溶胶来减少药物损失,但可能延长治疗时间。引导患者进行缓慢的深呼吸可以改善肺沉积并缩短雾化时间,但定量证据,特别是跨疾病组的证据仍然有限。目的:评估综合呼吸引导功能如何影响健康成人和阻塞性或限制性肺疾病患者的呼吸行为、肺沉积和使用者感知。方法:64名参与者通过三种雾化器配置进行吸入:低阻力参考(eFlow OS)和两种版本的eFlow集成雾化器,具有方向依赖的阻力和多模态反馈,使用或不使用呼吸引导应用程序进行测试。分析来自多次呼吸的流量信号以确定相位平均呼吸参数。采用方差分析评估器械效果。代表性的呼吸模式和非定常气溶胶特征被输入到一个经过验证的全肺硅模型中来估计沉积。采用问卷调查的方式评估用户体验。结果:呼吸引导持续改变吸入行为。峰值吸气流量减少了约20%,I/E比增加了约15%,并且使用呼吸引导应用程序,潮气量(+40%)和呼吸持续时间(+47%)增加。这些影响在不同的疾病组中是相似的。计算机模拟显示,引导吸入改善了给药:与参考相比,肺部药物沉积率增加了3.7%和15.5%,肺泡沉积质量分数增加了66%和76%。呼吸引导应用程序进一步将沉积从胸外转移到胸腔和肺泡区域,并减少了呼气损失(-14%)。大多数参与者(88%)表示满意或非常满意,他们提到了愉快的阻力和有用的应用程序指导。结论:呼吸引导功能和数字指导可靠地促进更慢、更深的呼吸,导致更大的肺和肺泡沉积和更短的预期雾化时间。高用户接受强调了以患者为中心的临床潜力,引导吸入优化气雾剂治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书