Acceptability and Feasibility of a Virtual Family-Based Single-Session Intervention for Young Teens at High Risk for Substance Use Disorder: Single-Arm Pilot Trial.

IF 2.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chelsea K Pike, Catherine Stanger, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Susan A Murphy, Vanessa Ramirez, Madison Siegel, Lucia Berglund, Amy Hughes Lansing
{"title":"Acceptability and Feasibility of a Virtual Family-Based Single-Session Intervention for Young Teens at High Risk for Substance Use Disorder: Single-Arm Pilot Trial.","authors":"Chelsea K Pike, Catherine Stanger, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Susan A Murphy, Vanessa Ramirez, Madison Siegel, Lucia Berglund, Amy Hughes Lansing","doi":"10.2196/93263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventive interventions to delay substance use disorder (SUD) are ideally delivered during early adolescence, a critical period for exposure to substance use (SU) risk factors. Young teens (aged 12-14 years) engaging in occasional use of alcohol, cannabis, or tobacco use, or with a family history of SUD, are at increased risk for SUD. Although behavioral-ecological family therapy is effective for prevention, many families face access barriers. Single-session interventions (SSIs) may offer an accessible, low-intensity alternative.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This open pilot trial aimed to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and potential usefulness of a family-based SSI targeting improvements in family practices that prevent SUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 9 young teens engaging in occasional SU or with a family history of SUD and their parent. The SSI involved a virtual 2-hour family consultation with a trained family coach. Acceptability was measured via Program Feedback Scale, feasibility via SSI completion rate, and potential usefulness via pre-post changes in parenting self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SSI was acceptable to parents and teens (mean Program Feedback Scale scores ≥3) and feasible (8/9, 88.89% of parent-teen dyads completed the SSI). Among the 8 completing dyads, most participants (13/16, 81.25%) selected Communication and Problem Solving as their primary target for change. Parents reported increases in parenting self-efficacy from pre- to post-SSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support the SSI's acceptability and feasibility for young teens at high risk for SUD. A randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm the SSI's acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy, as well as to address potential for delivery by a lay workforce.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06538922; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06538922.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e93263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/93263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preventive interventions to delay substance use disorder (SUD) are ideally delivered during early adolescence, a critical period for exposure to substance use (SU) risk factors. Young teens (aged 12-14 years) engaging in occasional use of alcohol, cannabis, or tobacco use, or with a family history of SUD, are at increased risk for SUD. Although behavioral-ecological family therapy is effective for prevention, many families face access barriers. Single-session interventions (SSIs) may offer an accessible, low-intensity alternative.

Objective: This open pilot trial aimed to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and potential usefulness of a family-based SSI targeting improvements in family practices that prevent SUD.

Methods: Participants were 9 young teens engaging in occasional SU or with a family history of SUD and their parent. The SSI involved a virtual 2-hour family consultation with a trained family coach. Acceptability was measured via Program Feedback Scale, feasibility via SSI completion rate, and potential usefulness via pre-post changes in parenting self-efficacy.

Results: The SSI was acceptable to parents and teens (mean Program Feedback Scale scores ≥3) and feasible (8/9, 88.89% of parent-teen dyads completed the SSI). Among the 8 completing dyads, most participants (13/16, 81.25%) selected Communication and Problem Solving as their primary target for change. Parents reported increases in parenting self-efficacy from pre- to post-SSI.

Conclusions: Findings support the SSI's acceptability and feasibility for young teens at high risk for SUD. A randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm the SSI's acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy, as well as to address potential for delivery by a lay workforce.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06538922; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06538922.

青少年物质使用障碍高风险的虚拟家庭单次干预的可接受性和可行性:单臂试点试验。
背景:延迟物质使用障碍(SUD)的预防性干预措施理想地在青少年早期提供,这是暴露于物质使用(SU)危险因素的关键时期。青少年(12-14岁)偶尔使用酒精、大麻或烟草,或有SUD家族史,患SUD的风险增加。虽然行为生态家庭治疗对预防是有效的,但许多家庭面临准入障碍。单次干预(ssi)可能提供一种可获得的低强度替代方案。目的:本公开试点试验旨在评估以家庭为基础的SSI的可接受性、可行性和潜在的有用性,以改善预防SUD的家庭实践为目标。方法:研究对象为9名青少年,他们偶尔参加集体活动或有SUD家族史。SSI包括与训练有素的家庭教练进行2小时的虚拟家庭咨询。可接受性通过项目反馈量表来衡量,可行性通过SSI完成率来衡量,潜在有用性通过育儿自我效能的前后变化来衡量。结果:家长和青少年均可接受(程序反馈量表平均得分≥3),且可行(8/9,88.89%的家长和青少年完成了SSI)。在8对完成的组合中,大多数参与者(13/16,81.25%)选择沟通和解决问题作为他们改变的主要目标。父母报告说,从自残前到自残后,父母的自我效能有所增加。结论:研究结果支持SSI对有SUD高风险的青少年的可接受性和可行性。需要一项随机临床试验来确认SSI的可接受性、可行性和有效性,并解决非专业人员交付的可能性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06538922;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06538922。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书