Acceptability and Feasibility of a Virtual Family-Based Single-Session Intervention for Young Teens at High Risk for Substance Use Disorder: Single-Arm Pilot Trial.
Chelsea K Pike, Catherine Stanger, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Susan A Murphy, Vanessa Ramirez, Madison Siegel, Lucia Berglund, Amy Hughes Lansing
{"title":"Acceptability and Feasibility of a Virtual Family-Based Single-Session Intervention for Young Teens at High Risk for Substance Use Disorder: Single-Arm Pilot Trial.","authors":"Chelsea K Pike, Catherine Stanger, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Susan A Murphy, Vanessa Ramirez, Madison Siegel, Lucia Berglund, Amy Hughes Lansing","doi":"10.2196/93263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventive interventions to delay substance use disorder (SUD) are ideally delivered during early adolescence, a critical period for exposure to substance use (SU) risk factors. Young teens (aged 12-14 years) engaging in occasional use of alcohol, cannabis, or tobacco use, or with a family history of SUD, are at increased risk for SUD. Although behavioral-ecological family therapy is effective for prevention, many families face access barriers. Single-session interventions (SSIs) may offer an accessible, low-intensity alternative.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This open pilot trial aimed to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and potential usefulness of a family-based SSI targeting improvements in family practices that prevent SUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 9 young teens engaging in occasional SU or with a family history of SUD and their parent. The SSI involved a virtual 2-hour family consultation with a trained family coach. Acceptability was measured via Program Feedback Scale, feasibility via SSI completion rate, and potential usefulness via pre-post changes in parenting self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SSI was acceptable to parents and teens (mean Program Feedback Scale scores ≥3) and feasible (8/9, 88.89% of parent-teen dyads completed the SSI). Among the 8 completing dyads, most participants (13/16, 81.25%) selected Communication and Problem Solving as their primary target for change. Parents reported increases in parenting self-efficacy from pre- to post-SSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support the SSI's acceptability and feasibility for young teens at high risk for SUD. A randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm the SSI's acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy, as well as to address potential for delivery by a lay workforce.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06538922; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06538922.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e93263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/93263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Preventive interventions to delay substance use disorder (SUD) are ideally delivered during early adolescence, a critical period for exposure to substance use (SU) risk factors. Young teens (aged 12-14 years) engaging in occasional use of alcohol, cannabis, or tobacco use, or with a family history of SUD, are at increased risk for SUD. Although behavioral-ecological family therapy is effective for prevention, many families face access barriers. Single-session interventions (SSIs) may offer an accessible, low-intensity alternative.
Objective: This open pilot trial aimed to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and potential usefulness of a family-based SSI targeting improvements in family practices that prevent SUD.
Methods: Participants were 9 young teens engaging in occasional SU or with a family history of SUD and their parent. The SSI involved a virtual 2-hour family consultation with a trained family coach. Acceptability was measured via Program Feedback Scale, feasibility via SSI completion rate, and potential usefulness via pre-post changes in parenting self-efficacy.
Results: The SSI was acceptable to parents and teens (mean Program Feedback Scale scores ≥3) and feasible (8/9, 88.89% of parent-teen dyads completed the SSI). Among the 8 completing dyads, most participants (13/16, 81.25%) selected Communication and Problem Solving as their primary target for change. Parents reported increases in parenting self-efficacy from pre- to post-SSI.
Conclusions: Findings support the SSI's acceptability and feasibility for young teens at high risk for SUD. A randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm the SSI's acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy, as well as to address potential for delivery by a lay workforce.