Patient-Reported Outcomes of Mirogabalin in Patients with Postoperative Spinal Cord-Related Central Neuropathic Pain Inadequately Controlled with Conventional Gabapentinoids: A Retrospective Real-World Study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dong Wook Kim, Danbi Park, Sang Hoon Hwang, Jin Hoon Park
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes of Mirogabalin in Patients with Postoperative Spinal Cord-Related Central Neuropathic Pain Inadequately Controlled with Conventional Gabapentinoids: A Retrospective Real-World Study.","authors":"Dong Wook Kim, Danbi Park, Sang Hoon Hwang, Jin Hoon Park","doi":"10.3340/jkns.2026.0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This single-center, observational study investigated the effectiveness and safety of switching to mirogabalin in patients with residual spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain that persisted despite conventional gabapentinoid therapy (gabapentin or pregabalin).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic medical records of 41 patients who switched from pregabalin or gabapentin to mirogabalin between November 2023 and June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Analgesic effectiveness was primarily assessed using the patient-reported percentage of pain reduction. Clinically meaningful and substantial pain reduction were defined as ≥ 30% and ≥ 50%, respectively. Safety was evaluated by assessing the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean baseline numerical rating scale score was 3.93 ± 1.75. Among the 41 patients included in the study, the interval between surgery and the first switch to mirogabalin was available for 35 patients. The median interval between surgery and switching to mirogabalin was 411 days (IQR, 88-743; range, 27-2091 days). Overall, 53.7% and 46.3% of patients achieved clinically meaningful (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) pain reduction, respectively, after switching to mirogabalin. AEs were reported in 31.7% of patients, with the most common being somnolence (12.2%), dizziness (7.3%), and weight gain (7.3%). All reported AEs were mild to moderate in severity. Consequently, 19.5% and 22.0% of patients discontinued mirogabalin and resumed their previous medication because of insufficient efficacy and AEs, respectively. For the secondary analysis, patients were divided according to disease etiology (spinal cord tumor vs. non-tumoral myelopathy). Clinically meaningful pain reduction was achieved in 60.0% and 47.6% of patients, respectively, with no significant difference in responder rates between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the findings may overestimate treatment effectiveness because of the retrospective design and reliance on subjective patient assessment, switching to mirogabalin provided additional clinically meaningful pain relief in approximately half of the patients with persistent postoperative spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain that was inadequately controlled with conventional gabapentinoids. These findings suggest that mirogabalin may represent a promising alternative treatment option for patients with residual spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain who have limited therapeutic options.</p>","PeriodicalId":16283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2026.0149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This single-center, observational study investigated the effectiveness and safety of switching to mirogabalin in patients with residual spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain that persisted despite conventional gabapentinoid therapy (gabapentin or pregabalin).

Methods: Electronic medical records of 41 patients who switched from pregabalin or gabapentin to mirogabalin between November 2023 and June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Analgesic effectiveness was primarily assessed using the patient-reported percentage of pain reduction. Clinically meaningful and substantial pain reduction were defined as ≥ 30% and ≥ 50%, respectively. Safety was evaluated by assessing the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).

Results: The mean baseline numerical rating scale score was 3.93 ± 1.75. Among the 41 patients included in the study, the interval between surgery and the first switch to mirogabalin was available for 35 patients. The median interval between surgery and switching to mirogabalin was 411 days (IQR, 88-743; range, 27-2091 days). Overall, 53.7% and 46.3% of patients achieved clinically meaningful (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) pain reduction, respectively, after switching to mirogabalin. AEs were reported in 31.7% of patients, with the most common being somnolence (12.2%), dizziness (7.3%), and weight gain (7.3%). All reported AEs were mild to moderate in severity. Consequently, 19.5% and 22.0% of patients discontinued mirogabalin and resumed their previous medication because of insufficient efficacy and AEs, respectively. For the secondary analysis, patients were divided according to disease etiology (spinal cord tumor vs. non-tumoral myelopathy). Clinically meaningful pain reduction was achieved in 60.0% and 47.6% of patients, respectively, with no significant difference in responder rates between the two groups.

Conclusion: Although the findings may overestimate treatment effectiveness because of the retrospective design and reliance on subjective patient assessment, switching to mirogabalin provided additional clinically meaningful pain relief in approximately half of the patients with persistent postoperative spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain that was inadequately controlled with conventional gabapentinoids. These findings suggest that mirogabalin may represent a promising alternative treatment option for patients with residual spinal cord-related central neuropathic pain who have limited therapeutic options.

米罗巴林治疗常规加巴喷丁类药物控制不足的术后脊髓相关性中枢神经性疼痛患者的患者报告结果:一项回顾性现实世界研究。
目的:这项单中心观察性研究调查了在常规加巴喷丁类药物(加巴喷丁或普瑞巴林)治疗后仍持续存在的脊髓相关中枢神经性疼痛患者改用米罗巴林的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2023年11月至2024年6月期间从普瑞巴林或加巴喷丁改用米罗巴林的41例患者的电子病历。镇痛效果主要通过患者报告的疼痛减轻百分比进行评估。临床意义和实质性疼痛减轻分别定义为≥30%和≥50%。通过评估不良事件(ae)的发生率和严重程度来评估安全性。结果:平均基线数值评定量表得分为3.93±1.75。在纳入研究的41例患者中,35例患者在手术和第一次改用米罗巴林之间的间隔是可用的。手术至改用米罗巴林的中位间隔为411天(IQR, 88-743;范围,27-2091天)。总体而言,改用米罗巴林后,53.7%和46.3%的患者分别达到了临床意义(≥30%)和实质性(≥50%)的疼痛减轻。31.7%的患者报告了不良事件,最常见的是嗜睡(12.2%)、头晕(7.3%)和体重增加(7.3%)。所有报告的ae的严重程度均为轻度至中度。因此,分别有19.5%和22.0%的患者因疗效不足和不良反应而停用米罗巴林并恢复之前的用药。在二次分析中,根据疾病病因(脊髓肿瘤与非肿瘤性脊髓病)对患者进行分组。分别有60.0%和47.6%的患者实现了临床意义上的疼痛减轻,两组之间的应答率无显著差异。结论:尽管由于回顾性设计和对患者主观评估的依赖,研究结果可能高估了治疗效果,但改用米罗巴林为大约一半的术后持续脊髓相关中枢神经性疼痛患者提供了额外的临床有意义的疼痛缓解,而传统加巴巴丁类药物无法充分控制这种疼痛。这些发现表明,对于治疗方案有限的脊髓相关中枢神经性疼痛残留患者,米罗巴林可能是一种有希望的替代治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society (J Korean Neurosurg Soc) is the official journal of the Korean Neurosurgical Society, and published bimonthly (1st day of January, March, May, July, September, and November). It launched in October 31, 1972 with Volume 1 and Number 1. J Korean Neurosurg Soc aims to allow neurosurgeons from around the world to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism. This journal publishes Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports, Technical Notes, and Letters to the Editor. Our field of interest involves clinical neurosurgery (cerebrovascular disease, neuro-oncology, skull base neurosurgery, spine, pediatric neurosurgery, functional neurosurgery, epilepsy, neuro-trauma, and peripheral nerve disease) and laboratory work in neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书