Lymphopenia and elevated NLR identify patients with septic shock who may benefit from corticosteroids: a target trial emulation study.

IF 2.9 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Patrick Jason Toppin, Mario Diego Teles Correia, Yale Chang, Lasith Adhikari, Brian McLaverty, Annamalai Natarajan
{"title":"Lymphopenia and elevated NLR identify patients with septic shock who may benefit from corticosteroids: a target trial emulation study.","authors":"Patrick Jason Toppin, Mario Diego Teles Correia, Yale Chang, Lasith Adhikari, Brian McLaverty, Annamalai Natarajan","doi":"10.1186/s40635-026-00972-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Septic shock is the most severe form of sepsis and has high mortality. Despite the widespread use of corticosteroids, evidence of their benefit remains unclear; precision critical care medicine has sought to identify which patients will benefit. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are widely available markers of inflammation and immune function. This study aimed to determine whether these parameters can identify septic shock patients likely to benefit from corticosteroid treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A target trial was emulated using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Adult patients in the ICU for at least 24 h who met the Sepsis-3 definition for septic shock were included. The cohort was divided into those who received corticosteroids and those who did not. Covariates extracted included NLR and PLR. An Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) double-robust estimator was applied to evaluate the effect of corticosteroids on ICU mortality (primary outcome), in-hospital mortality, the need for renal replacement therapy, the duration of vasopressor therapy, and the length of ICU and hospital stay (secondary outcomes). Univariate AUROC was used to compare the predictive performance of the evaluated parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5,533 septic shock stays were identified; 1,009 (18.23%) received corticosteroids. The corticosteroid group was much sicker than the control group, with higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores and greater vasopressor requirements. After adjusting for confounding via an AIPW doubly robust estimator, the analysis revealed that lower baseline lymphocyte count (AUROC 0.65), higher NLR (AUROC 0.62), and higher PLR (AUROC 0.63) had modest but consistent ability to identify cases that benefited from corticosteroid therapy, as reflected by reduced ICU mortality. These compared favourably to the use of the maximum SOFA score (AUROC 0.65) and had similar predictive power for all secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower lymphocyte count, higher NLR and PLR were associated with an increased likelihood of model-estimated benefit from corticosteroids. Although the predictive power of these markers was modest, their low cost and wide availability could make them appealing in low-resource settings. Further research into these simple parameters to guide the treatment of septic shock is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13624219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-026-00972-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Septic shock is the most severe form of sepsis and has high mortality. Despite the widespread use of corticosteroids, evidence of their benefit remains unclear; precision critical care medicine has sought to identify which patients will benefit. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are widely available markers of inflammation and immune function. This study aimed to determine whether these parameters can identify septic shock patients likely to benefit from corticosteroid treatment.

Methods: A target trial was emulated using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Adult patients in the ICU for at least 24 h who met the Sepsis-3 definition for septic shock were included. The cohort was divided into those who received corticosteroids and those who did not. Covariates extracted included NLR and PLR. An Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) double-robust estimator was applied to evaluate the effect of corticosteroids on ICU mortality (primary outcome), in-hospital mortality, the need for renal replacement therapy, the duration of vasopressor therapy, and the length of ICU and hospital stay (secondary outcomes). Univariate AUROC was used to compare the predictive performance of the evaluated parameters.

Results: 5,533 septic shock stays were identified; 1,009 (18.23%) received corticosteroids. The corticosteroid group was much sicker than the control group, with higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores and greater vasopressor requirements. After adjusting for confounding via an AIPW doubly robust estimator, the analysis revealed that lower baseline lymphocyte count (AUROC 0.65), higher NLR (AUROC 0.62), and higher PLR (AUROC 0.63) had modest but consistent ability to identify cases that benefited from corticosteroid therapy, as reflected by reduced ICU mortality. These compared favourably to the use of the maximum SOFA score (AUROC 0.65) and had similar predictive power for all secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: Lower lymphocyte count, higher NLR and PLR were associated with an increased likelihood of model-estimated benefit from corticosteroids. Although the predictive power of these markers was modest, their low cost and wide availability could make them appealing in low-resource settings. Further research into these simple parameters to guide the treatment of septic shock is warranted.

淋巴细胞减少症和NLR升高可识别可能受益于皮质类固醇的脓毒性休克患者:一项目标试验模拟研究。
背景:脓毒性休克是最严重的脓毒症,死亡率高。尽管皮质类固醇广泛使用,但其益处的证据仍不清楚;精确的重症监护医学试图确定哪些病人将受益。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)是广泛使用的炎症和免疫功能的标志物。本研究旨在确定这些参数是否可以识别可能受益于皮质类固醇治疗的脓毒性休克患者。方法:利用重症监护医学信息市场IV数据库的数据模拟目标试验。符合脓毒症-3定义的脓毒症休克在ICU住院至少24小时的成年患者被纳入。该队列被分为接受皮质类固醇和未接受皮质类固醇的两组。提取的协变量包括NLR和PLR。应用增强逆概率加权(AIPW)双稳健估计器评估皮质类固醇对ICU死亡率(主要结局)、院内死亡率、肾脏替代治疗需求、血管加压剂治疗持续时间、ICU和住院时间(次要结局)的影响。单变量AUROC用于比较评估参数的预测性能。结果:确诊感染性休克住院5533例;1009例(18.23%)接受皮质类固醇治疗。皮质类固醇组的病情比对照组严重得多,有更高的顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和更高的血管加压药物需求。在通过AIPW双稳健估计器调整混杂因素后,分析显示较低的基线淋巴细胞计数(AUROC 0.65),较高的NLR (AUROC 0.62)和较高的PLR (AUROC 0.63)具有中等但一致的能力来识别受益于皮质类固醇治疗的病例,这反映在降低ICU死亡率上。与使用最大SOFA评分(AUROC 0.65)相比,这些方法更有利,并且对所有次要结果具有相似的预测能力。结论:较低的淋巴细胞计数,较高的NLR和PLR与模型估计的皮质类固醇获益的可能性增加有关。尽管这些标志物的预测能力并不强,但它们的低成本和广泛可用性使它们在资源匮乏的环境中具有吸引力。进一步研究这些简单的参数来指导脓毒性休克的治疗是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书