Adjunctive Cold Atmospheric Plasma Therapy for Tracheostomy Wound Healing in Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Lalita Jaingim, Kanlayanee Sittiwat, Kotchawan Nongyam, Konlawij Trongtrakul
{"title":"Adjunctive Cold Atmospheric Plasma Therapy for Tracheostomy Wound Healing in Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Lalita Jaingim,&nbsp;Kanlayanee Sittiwat,&nbsp;Kotchawan Nongyam,&nbsp;Konlawij Trongtrakul","doi":"10.1111/iwj.71051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) therapy has emerged as a promising therapy for wound healing. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of adjunctive CAP therapy for early tracheostomy wound healing compared with standard wound care (SWC) alone. This single-centre, parallel-group pilot randomised controlled trial (1:1 allocation) enrolled critically ill patients undergoing tracheostomy. Patients received 1-min CAP applications on postoperative days 1, 3 and 5 plus SWC or SWC alone. The primary endpoint was the percentage reduction in tracheostomy wound area through postoperative day 7, assessed by a blinded outcome assessor. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of participants and treating clinicians was not feasible; however, the outcome assessor was blinded to group allocation. Wound healing trajectories were analysed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for baseline wound area. Forty-two patients were included (CAP, <i>n</i> = 21; SWC, <i>n</i> = 21), with comparable baseline characteristics. By postoperative day 7, wound area reduction was greater in the CAP group than in the SWC group (30.3% vs. 23.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.15). Estimated wound area decreased by 0.08 versus 0.06 cm<sup>2</sup>/day (95% CI 0.06–0.10 and 0.04–0.08, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.17). No treatment-related adverse events were observed. Adjunctive CAP therapy was feasible, safe and demonstrated a non-significant trend towards improved early tracheostomy wound healing. These findings support further evaluation in larger, adequately powered trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"23 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13623508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.71051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) therapy has emerged as a promising therapy for wound healing. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of adjunctive CAP therapy for early tracheostomy wound healing compared with standard wound care (SWC) alone. This single-centre, parallel-group pilot randomised controlled trial (1:1 allocation) enrolled critically ill patients undergoing tracheostomy. Patients received 1-min CAP applications on postoperative days 1, 3 and 5 plus SWC or SWC alone. The primary endpoint was the percentage reduction in tracheostomy wound area through postoperative day 7, assessed by a blinded outcome assessor. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of participants and treating clinicians was not feasible; however, the outcome assessor was blinded to group allocation. Wound healing trajectories were analysed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for baseline wound area. Forty-two patients were included (CAP, n = 21; SWC, n = 21), with comparable baseline characteristics. By postoperative day 7, wound area reduction was greater in the CAP group than in the SWC group (30.3% vs. 23.6%, p = 0.15). Estimated wound area decreased by 0.08 versus 0.06 cm2/day (95% CI 0.06–0.10 and 0.04–0.08, respectively; p = 0.17). No treatment-related adverse events were observed. Adjunctive CAP therapy was feasible, safe and demonstrated a non-significant trend towards improved early tracheostomy wound healing. These findings support further evaluation in larger, adequately powered trials.

辅助冷常压血浆治疗危重患者气管切开术伤口愈合:一项随机对照试验。
冷大气等离子体(CAP)治疗已成为一种很有前途的伤口愈合治疗方法。本研究旨在评价辅助CAP治疗早期气管造口创面愈合的可行性、安全性和有效性,并与单纯标准创面护理(SWC)进行比较。这项单中心、平行组先导随机对照试验(1:1分配)纳入了接受气管切开术的危重患者。患者在术后第1、3和5天接受1分钟CAP应用,同时使用SWC或单独使用SWC。主要终点是术后第7天气管造口伤口面积减少的百分比,由盲法结局评估者评估。由于干预的性质,参与者和治疗临床医生的盲法是不可行的;然而,结果评估者对分组分配是盲目的。使用基线伤口面积调整的线性混合效应模型分析伤口愈合轨迹。纳入42例具有可比基线特征的患者(CAP, n = 21; SWC, n = 21)。术后第7天,CAP组创面缩小率高于SWC组(30.3% vs. 23.6%, p = 0.15)。估计伤口面积减少0.08和0.06 cm2/天(95% CI分别为0.06-0.10和0.04-0.08;p = 0.17)。未观察到与治疗相关的不良事件。辅助CAP治疗是可行的、安全的,并且在改善气管造口术早期创面愈合方面表现出不显著的趋势。这些发现支持在更大规模、更有力的试验中进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书