Characterizing the Benefits of Serial Ascitic Fluid Testing in Ambulatory Patients with Cirrhosis: A National Cohort Study.

IF 16.2 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Nadim Mahmud, Alexandra A McCullough, Siqi Zhang, Jinxuan Hao, Douglas E Schaubel, David E Kaplan, Marina Serper
{"title":"Characterizing the Benefits of Serial Ascitic Fluid Testing in Ambulatory Patients with Cirrhosis: A National Cohort Study.","authors":"Nadim Mahmud, Alexandra A McCullough, Siqi Zhang, Jinxuan Hao, Douglas E Schaubel, David E Kaplan, Marina Serper","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2026.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a life-threatening cirrhosis complication, yet guidance for sending fluid studies from outpatient paracentesis remains limited with unclear clinical impact. We aimed to characterize variation in ascitic fluid testing practices during outpatient paracentesis in cirrhosis and evaluate its association with short-term hospitalization and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 60,619 outpatient paracenteses among 4,467 patients with cirrhosis in the Veterans Health Administration from 2012-2023. Testing frequency was defined as the proportion of procedures in which diagnostic fluid studies for SBP were sent. Inverse probability treatment weighting and marginal proportional rates models were used to estimate associations with 30-day outcomes. Exploratory analyses evaluated interactions with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic fluid studies were performed in 32.7% of outpatient paracenteses, however testing frequency varied by region, provider type, and facility. Compared to intermediate-frequency testing, both always (100%) and never (0%) testing strategies demonstrated lower 7-day hospitalization risk. In final models, patients tested at every paracentesis had the lowest rates of hospitalization (RR 0.65 vs. 50% testing frequency, 95% CI 0.58-0.72) and 30-day mortality (p<0.001), with associations favoring universal testing particularly among patients with higher CTP scores. These patients were also more likely to receive outpatient SBP antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ascitic fluid testing practices for outpatient paracentesis vary substantially and are associated with differences in outcomes. Universal testing was associated with lower short-term hospitalization and mortality among patients with higher CTP scores, although these observational findings may reflect differences in patient selection and care delivery. Evaluation of standardized, risk-adapted testing protocols is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2026.09.029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a life-threatening cirrhosis complication, yet guidance for sending fluid studies from outpatient paracentesis remains limited with unclear clinical impact. We aimed to characterize variation in ascitic fluid testing practices during outpatient paracentesis in cirrhosis and evaluate its association with short-term hospitalization and mortality.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 60,619 outpatient paracenteses among 4,467 patients with cirrhosis in the Veterans Health Administration from 2012-2023. Testing frequency was defined as the proportion of procedures in which diagnostic fluid studies for SBP were sent. Inverse probability treatment weighting and marginal proportional rates models were used to estimate associations with 30-day outcomes. Exploratory analyses evaluated interactions with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score.

Results: Diagnostic fluid studies were performed in 32.7% of outpatient paracenteses, however testing frequency varied by region, provider type, and facility. Compared to intermediate-frequency testing, both always (100%) and never (0%) testing strategies demonstrated lower 7-day hospitalization risk. In final models, patients tested at every paracentesis had the lowest rates of hospitalization (RR 0.65 vs. 50% testing frequency, 95% CI 0.58-0.72) and 30-day mortality (p<0.001), with associations favoring universal testing particularly among patients with higher CTP scores. These patients were also more likely to receive outpatient SBP antibiotics.

Conclusion: Ascitic fluid testing practices for outpatient paracentesis vary substantially and are associated with differences in outcomes. Universal testing was associated with lower short-term hospitalization and mortality among patients with higher CTP scores, although these observational findings may reflect differences in patient selection and care delivery. Evaluation of standardized, risk-adapted testing protocols is warranted.

一项国家队列研究:对肝硬化患者进行连续腹水检测的益处
背景和目的:自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)是一种危及生命的肝硬化并发症,但门诊穿刺送液检查的指导仍然有限,临床影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是表征肝硬化患者门诊穿刺术中腹水检测方法的变化,并评估其与短期住院和死亡率的关系。方法:我们对2012-2023年退伍军人健康管理局4467名肝硬化患者中60619名门诊患者进行了回顾性队列研究。检测频率定义为发送收缩压诊断性液体检查的程序的比例。使用反概率治疗加权和边际比例率模型来估计与30天预后的关联。探索性分析评估与child - turcote - pugh (CTP)评分的相互作用。结果:32.7%的门诊穿刺术患者进行了诊断性液体检查,但检查频率因地区、提供者类型和设施而异。与中频检测相比,总是(100%)和从不(0%)检测策略均显示出较低的7天住院风险。在最终的模型中,每次穿刺检测的患者住院率最低(RR 0.65 vs. 50%的检测频率,95% CI 0.58-0.72)和30天死亡率最低(p结论:门诊穿刺腹水检测方法差异很大,与结果差异有关。在CTP评分较高的患者中,普遍检测与较低的短期住院率和死亡率相关,尽管这些观察性发现可能反映了患者选择和护理提供的差异。有必要对标准化的、适应风险的测试方案进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书