To Interrupt or Not to Interrupt? A Case-Based Survey on Physician Management of Breastfeeding After Radiological Imaging and Medication in the Emergency Department.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Şeyma Karatekin, Özge Yanık, Metin Ocak
{"title":"To Interrupt or Not to Interrupt? A Case-Based Survey on Physician Management of Breastfeeding After Radiological Imaging and Medication in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Şeyma Karatekin, Özge Yanık, Metin Ocak","doi":"10.1177/15568253261492475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal illness requiring medication or diagnostic imaging may challenge breastfeeding continuation, particularly in emergency departments (ED), where rapid clinical decisions are required. This study aimed to evaluate emergency physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding breastfeeding continuation after medication use and imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians. A structured, scenario-based online questionnaire consisting of 20 items was distributed to physicians working in ED. The survey assessed sociodemographic characteristics, frequency of encounters with breastfeeding mothers, and clinical approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 160 invited physicians, 71 completed the survey (response rate: 44.4%). The mean age was 32.9 ± 6.4 years, and 62% were male. Physicians frequently encountered breastfeeding mothers in clinical practice, with 49.3% reporting daily, 28.2% weekly, and 22.5% monthly encounters. In scenario-based questions, the proportion of participants reporting that breastfeeding could be continued without interruption was 47.9% for ibuprofen, 29.6% for methylprednisolone, 70.4% for ondansetron, 56.3% for omeprazole, 54.9% for adenosine, and 26.8% for metoprolol. For radiological procedures, continuation rates were 91.5% for plain X-ray, 38% for contrast-enhanced CT, and 49.3% for MRI. Nearly half of the participants (47.9%) reported insufficient knowledge regarding breastfeeding management. Knowledge scores differed significantly by professional title (<i>p</i> = 0.001), with general practitioners scoring lower than residents and specialists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Emergency physicians, despite frequently encountering breastfeeding mothers, may show variability in their knowledge, attitudes, and clinical approaches to the management of breastfeeding patients. On the other hand, a higher level of knowledge among residents and specialists suggests that specialist training can be effective in ensuring correct clinical practice. Increasing access to guidelines and integrating evidence-based breastfeeding education into specialist training curricula, including medical school curricula, can improve clinical decision-making processes and prevent unnecessary interventions in breastfeeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"15568253261492475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15568253261492475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maternal illness requiring medication or diagnostic imaging may challenge breastfeeding continuation, particularly in emergency departments (ED), where rapid clinical decisions are required. This study aimed to evaluate emergency physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding breastfeeding continuation after medication use and imaging.

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians. A structured, scenario-based online questionnaire consisting of 20 items was distributed to physicians working in ED. The survey assessed sociodemographic characteristics, frequency of encounters with breastfeeding mothers, and clinical approaches.

Results: Of 160 invited physicians, 71 completed the survey (response rate: 44.4%). The mean age was 32.9 ± 6.4 years, and 62% were male. Physicians frequently encountered breastfeeding mothers in clinical practice, with 49.3% reporting daily, 28.2% weekly, and 22.5% monthly encounters. In scenario-based questions, the proportion of participants reporting that breastfeeding could be continued without interruption was 47.9% for ibuprofen, 29.6% for methylprednisolone, 70.4% for ondansetron, 56.3% for omeprazole, 54.9% for adenosine, and 26.8% for metoprolol. For radiological procedures, continuation rates were 91.5% for plain X-ray, 38% for contrast-enhanced CT, and 49.3% for MRI. Nearly half of the participants (47.9%) reported insufficient knowledge regarding breastfeeding management. Knowledge scores differed significantly by professional title (p = 0.001), with general practitioners scoring lower than residents and specialists.

Conclusion: Emergency physicians, despite frequently encountering breastfeeding mothers, may show variability in their knowledge, attitudes, and clinical approaches to the management of breastfeeding patients. On the other hand, a higher level of knowledge among residents and specialists suggests that specialist training can be effective in ensuring correct clinical practice. Increasing access to guidelines and integrating evidence-based breastfeeding education into specialist training curricula, including medical school curricula, can improve clinical decision-making processes and prevent unnecessary interventions in breastfeeding.

打断还是不打断?急诊科放射影像及药物治疗后母乳喂养医师管理的个案调查
背景:需要药物治疗或影像学诊断的产妇疾病可能会挑战母乳喂养的延续,特别是在急诊科(ED),在那里需要快速的临床决策。本研究旨在评估急诊医师对药物使用和影像学检查后继续母乳喂养的知识、态度和临床实践。方法:在医生中进行描述性横断面研究。一份结构化的、基于场景的在线问卷由20个项目组成,分发给在急诊科工作的医生。该调查评估了社会人口统计学特征、与母乳喂养母亲接触的频率和临床方法。结果:160名受邀医师中,71名完成调查,回复率为44.4%。平均年龄32.9±6.4岁,男性占62%。医生在临床实践中经常遇到母乳喂养的母亲,49.3%的人每天报告,28.2%的人每周报告,22.5%的人每月报告。在基于场景的问题中,报告可以不间断地继续母乳喂养的参与者比例为:布洛芬组47.9%,甲基强的松龙组29.6%,昂丹司琼组70.4%,奥美拉唑组56.3%,腺苷组54.9%,美托洛尔组26.8%。对于放射治疗,x线平片的延续率为91.5%,增强CT为38%,MRI为49.3%。近一半的参与者(47.9%)表示对母乳喂养管理知识不足。不同职称的知识得分差异显著(p = 0.001),全科医生的得分低于住院医生和专科医生。结论:尽管急诊医生经常遇到母乳喂养的母亲,但他们对母乳喂养患者管理的知识、态度和临床方法可能存在差异。另一方面,住院医生和专科医生的知识水平较高,表明专科医生培训可以有效地确保正确的临床实践。增加获得指南的机会,并将循证母乳喂养教育纳入专科培训课程,包括医学院课程,可以改善临床决策过程,防止对母乳喂养进行不必要的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书