Enhanced screening and bacterial sexually-transmitted infection diagnoses after HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis initiation.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Anna M Parker, Samuel M Jenness, Benjamin J Singer, Jennifer J Chang, Katia J Bruxvoort, Joseph A Lewnard
{"title":"Enhanced screening and bacterial sexually-transmitted infection diagnoses after HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis initiation.","authors":"Anna M Parker, Samuel M Jenness, Benjamin J Singer, Jennifer J Chang, Katia J Bruxvoort, Joseph A Lewnard","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000002052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recipients of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) experience higher rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses than non-recipients. However, it is unclear if these observations reflect a causal relationship between PrEP initiation and acquisition of sexually transmitted infections (i.e., behavioral \"risk compensation\") or a diagnostic bias related to PrEP recipients screening more frequently than non-recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a self-controlled case series study comparing rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses after versus before PrEP initiation among commercially-insured US males in the Merative MarketScan® Research Databases (2016-2019). We compared matched incidence rate ratio (IRR) estimates after versus before PrEP initiation to model-based expectations under a null hypothesis of no change in infection risk. We derived null expectations via a mathematical model reflecting changes in screening after PrEP initiation, estimating parameters under a Bayesian framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals experienced increased rates of gonorrhea (IRR=3.47 [95% confidence interval: 2.57-4.72]) and chlamydia (IRR=3.59 [2.50-5.27]) diagnoses after PrEP initiation, with IRR estimates differing by anatomical site (IRR=1.23 [0.71-2.13] and 5.98 [3.63-10.29] for urogenital and extragenital diagnoses of either infection, respectively). After accounting for increased rates of screening after PrEP initiation, rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses only modestly exceeded expectations under the null hypothesis of no change in infection risk (8-14% greater-than-expected rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses, respectively). Overall, we estimated that 80-81% of observed increases in rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses after PrEP initiation, respectively, were attributable to increases in asymptomatic screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest higher-frequency asymptomatic screening, rather than behavioral risk compensation, may account for increased rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses after PrEP initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13673169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000002052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recipients of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) experience higher rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses than non-recipients. However, it is unclear if these observations reflect a causal relationship between PrEP initiation and acquisition of sexually transmitted infections (i.e., behavioral "risk compensation") or a diagnostic bias related to PrEP recipients screening more frequently than non-recipients.

Methods: We conducted a self-controlled case series study comparing rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses after versus before PrEP initiation among commercially-insured US males in the Merative MarketScan® Research Databases (2016-2019). We compared matched incidence rate ratio (IRR) estimates after versus before PrEP initiation to model-based expectations under a null hypothesis of no change in infection risk. We derived null expectations via a mathematical model reflecting changes in screening after PrEP initiation, estimating parameters under a Bayesian framework.

Results: Individuals experienced increased rates of gonorrhea (IRR=3.47 [95% confidence interval: 2.57-4.72]) and chlamydia (IRR=3.59 [2.50-5.27]) diagnoses after PrEP initiation, with IRR estimates differing by anatomical site (IRR=1.23 [0.71-2.13] and 5.98 [3.63-10.29] for urogenital and extragenital diagnoses of either infection, respectively). After accounting for increased rates of screening after PrEP initiation, rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses only modestly exceeded expectations under the null hypothesis of no change in infection risk (8-14% greater-than-expected rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses, respectively). Overall, we estimated that 80-81% of observed increases in rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses after PrEP initiation, respectively, were attributable to increases in asymptomatic screening.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest higher-frequency asymptomatic screening, rather than behavioral risk compensation, may account for increased rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses after PrEP initiation.

艾滋病毒暴露前预防开始后加强筛查和细菌性传播感染诊断。
背景:接受HIV暴露前预防(PrEP)的人比未接受的人有更高的淋病和衣原体诊断率。然而,目前尚不清楚这些观察结果是否反映了PrEP开始和获得性传播感染之间的因果关系(即行为“风险补偿”)或与PrEP接受者比非接受者更频繁筛查相关的诊断偏差。方法:我们在Merative MarketScan®研究数据库(2016-2019)中进行了一项自我对照病例系列研究,比较了商业保险的美国男性在开始PrEP后与开始PrEP前的淋病和衣原体诊出率。在感染风险无变化的零假设下,我们比较了PrEP开始后与开始前的匹配发病率比(IRR)估计值与基于模型的预期值。我们通过反映PrEP开始后筛选变化的数学模型推导出零期望,并在贝叶斯框架下估计参数。结果:个体在PrEP开始后出现淋病(IRR=3.47[95%可信区间:2.57-4.72])和衣原体(IRR=3.59[2.50-5.27])诊出率的增加,其IRR估计值因解剖部位的不同而不同(泌尿生殖器和生殖器外两种感染的IRR分别为1.23[0.71-2.13]和5.98[3.63-10.29])。考虑到PrEP开始后筛查率的增加,在感染风险没有变化的零假设下,淋病和衣原体诊断率仅略高于预期(淋病和衣原体诊断率分别比预期高8-14%)。总体而言,我们估计在PrEP开始后淋病和衣原体诊断率分别增加的80-81%可归因于无症状筛查的增加。结论:我们的研究结果表明,更高频率的无症状筛查,而不是行为风险补偿,可能是PrEP开始后淋病和衣原体诊断率增加的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书