Digital self-management engagement and long-term patient-reported outcome trajectories in inflammatory arthritis: a real-world retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Dmytro Fedkov, Danylo Yevstifeiev, Jan Leipe, Oleg Iaremenko, Daria Koliadenko, Liubov Petelytska, Felix Lang, Abdullah Khalil, Türker Kurt, Stefan Vordenbäumen
{"title":"Digital self-management engagement and long-term patient-reported outcome trajectories in inflammatory arthritis: a real-world retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Dmytro Fedkov, Danylo Yevstifeiev, Jan Leipe, Oleg Iaremenko, Daria Koliadenko, Liubov Petelytska, Felix Lang, Abdullah Khalil, Türker Kurt, Stefan Vordenbäumen","doi":"10.1007/s10067-026-08425-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), pain, and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) are core patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory arthritis. We examined whether digital self-management engagement was associated with their long-term trajectories.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort included 3513 adults using a certified digital self-management application. Patients were grouped by completion of 0, 1-2, or ≥3 structured self-management plans. Longitudinal models with patient-level cluster-robust standard errors estimated post-baseline change trajectories. Sensitivity analyses addressed differential attrition, measured confounding, and reverse causality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2895 patients with baseline PtGADA, 1026 (35.4%) contributed post-baseline observations. Patients completing ≥3 plans had more favourable PtGADA, pain, and RAPID3 trajectories than zero-plan patients (group-effect p=6.2×10<sup>-5</sup>, p=0.0055, and p=0.0044, respectively), without diverging slopes. At weeks 12-48, PtGADA improved by 11.1-12.1 points and pain by 7.2-7.3 points in the high-engagement group. After attrition weighting, PtGADA remained significant, RAPID3 retained a significant joint group effect, and pain was no longer significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher engagement was most robustly associated with more favourable long-term PtGADA trajectories; support for pain was directionally similar but statistically more limited, and RAPID3 findings were the least consistent of the three outcomes. These results describe an engagement-associated phenotype rather than a causal treatment effect and support its evaluation as a potential marker of sustained digital engagement in future prospective stratification studies. Key Points • In this real-world cohort of 3513 patients with inflammatory arthritis, higher digital self-management engagement was most robustly associated with more favourable PtGADA trajectories; the association with pain was directionally similar but less robust, while RAPID3 findings were less consistent. • Engagement-group trajectories were approximately parallel, and the findings remained directionally consistent in analyses examining sensitivity to differential follow-up, measured baseline differences, and reverse-causality concerns, although statistical significance varied by outcome and landmark. • The engagement-outcome association was directionally consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses addressing measured confounding and differential follow-up, although temporal exposure assignment could not be established and residual reverse-causality bias cannot be excluded. • Digital self-management engagement, operationalised by action-plan completion, represents a potential marker of sustained digital engagement for future prospective stratification studies, rather than a validated tool for baseline risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-026-08425-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objectives: Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), pain, and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) are core patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory arthritis. We examined whether digital self-management engagement was associated with their long-term trajectories.

Method: This retrospective cohort included 3513 adults using a certified digital self-management application. Patients were grouped by completion of 0, 1-2, or ≥3 structured self-management plans. Longitudinal models with patient-level cluster-robust standard errors estimated post-baseline change trajectories. Sensitivity analyses addressed differential attrition, measured confounding, and reverse causality.

Results: Of 2895 patients with baseline PtGADA, 1026 (35.4%) contributed post-baseline observations. Patients completing ≥3 plans had more favourable PtGADA, pain, and RAPID3 trajectories than zero-plan patients (group-effect p=6.2×10-5, p=0.0055, and p=0.0044, respectively), without diverging slopes. At weeks 12-48, PtGADA improved by 11.1-12.1 points and pain by 7.2-7.3 points in the high-engagement group. After attrition weighting, PtGADA remained significant, RAPID3 retained a significant joint group effect, and pain was no longer significant.

Conclusions: Higher engagement was most robustly associated with more favourable long-term PtGADA trajectories; support for pain was directionally similar but statistically more limited, and RAPID3 findings were the least consistent of the three outcomes. These results describe an engagement-associated phenotype rather than a causal treatment effect and support its evaluation as a potential marker of sustained digital engagement in future prospective stratification studies. Key Points • In this real-world cohort of 3513 patients with inflammatory arthritis, higher digital self-management engagement was most robustly associated with more favourable PtGADA trajectories; the association with pain was directionally similar but less robust, while RAPID3 findings were less consistent. • Engagement-group trajectories were approximately parallel, and the findings remained directionally consistent in analyses examining sensitivity to differential follow-up, measured baseline differences, and reverse-causality concerns, although statistical significance varied by outcome and landmark. • The engagement-outcome association was directionally consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses addressing measured confounding and differential follow-up, although temporal exposure assignment could not be established and residual reverse-causality bias cannot be excluded. • Digital self-management engagement, operationalised by action-plan completion, represents a potential marker of sustained digital engagement for future prospective stratification studies, rather than a validated tool for baseline risk stratification.

炎性关节炎的数字化自我管理参与和长期患者报告的结果轨迹:一项真实世界的回顾性队列研究。
患者疾病活动性总体评估(PtGADA)、疼痛和患者指数数据常规评估3 (RAPID3)是炎症性关节炎患者报告的核心结局。我们研究了数字自我管理参与是否与他们的长期发展轨迹有关。方法:该回顾性队列包括3513名使用认证数字自我管理应用程序的成年人。患者按完成0、1-2或≥3个结构化自我管理计划进行分组。具有患者水平聚类鲁棒标准误差的纵向模型估计基线后的变化轨迹。敏感性分析处理差异损耗、测量混淆和反向因果关系。结果:在2895例基线PtGADA患者中,1026例(35.4%)进行了基线后观察。完成≥3个计划的患者比没有计划的患者有更有利的PtGADA、疼痛和RAPID3轨迹(组效应p=6.2×10-5, p=0.0055和p=0.0044),没有偏离斜率。在12-48周时,高参与组的PtGADA改善了11.1-12.1分,疼痛改善了7.2-7.3分。磨耗加权后,PtGADA仍然显著,RAPID3保留显著的关节组效应,疼痛不再显著。结论:高参与度与更有利的长期PtGADA轨迹密切相关;对疼痛的支持方向相似,但统计上更有限,RAPID3的结果是三个结果中最不一致的。这些结果描述了参与相关的表型,而不是因果治疗效果,并支持其作为未来前瞻性分层研究中持续数字参与的潜在标志的评估。•在3513名炎性关节炎患者的现实世界队列中,更高的数字自我管理参与度与更有利的PtGADA轨迹最为密切相关;与疼痛的关联方向相似,但强度较低,而RAPID3的结果不太一致。•参与-群体轨迹大致平行,尽管统计显著性因结果和里程碑而异,但在对差异随访、测量基线差异和反向因果关系的敏感性分析中,研究结果保持方向一致。•尽管无法确定时间暴露分配,也无法排除残留的反向因果关系偏差,但在处理测量混淆和差异随访的多个敏感性分析中,参与-结果关联在方向上是一致的。•数字化自我管理参与,通过行动计划的完成进行操作,代表了未来前瞻性分层研究中持续数字化参与的潜在标志,而不是基线风险分层的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rheumatology
Clinical Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
441
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level. The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书