Effects of Pre-MRI Multimodal Psychosocial Nursing Intervention on Anxiety and Examination Compliance in Patients With Optic Neuritis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ning Ma, Bo Feng
{"title":"Effects of Pre-MRI Multimodal Psychosocial Nursing Intervention on Anxiety and Examination Compliance in Patients With Optic Neuritis.","authors":"Ning Ma, Bo Feng","doi":"10.31083/BJHM58251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosing and monitoring optic neuritis. However, the procedure itself may induce significant anxiety in patients, potentially compromising examination compliance and image quality. This study retrospectively evaluated the effects of a structured, multimodal pre-MRI psychosocial nursing intervention on anxiety and compliance in patients with optic neuritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 106 patients diagnosed with optic neuritis who underwent MRI at Jiaozhou Central Hospital of Qingdao between June 2021 and June 2024 were included. Patients were allocated to two groups based on the type of nursing intervention received before the MRI: the control group received routine nursing intervention, while the observation group received a comprehensive intervention comprising four core components: structured health education, individualized psychological support, environmental and emotional support, and family guidance. The Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were administered at baseline to assess the comparability of general psychological status between groups. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form-1 (STAI-1) was used to evaluate periprocedural state anxiety before and after the intervention. Physiological indicators, including heart rate and blood pressure as anxiety-related stress indicators, and oxygen saturation as a safety parameter, as well as examination compliance, were compared between the two groups. Compliance was assessed by MRI technicians using a 5-point scale based on image clarity and motion artifacts, with higher scores indicating better cooperation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline SAS, SDS, and STAI-1 scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), indicating comparability in general psychological status and pre-intervention anxiety levels. Following the intervention, the STAI-1 score (43.16 ± 2.85) in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, the observation group exhibited significantly lower post-intervention heart rate and blood pressure compared with the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The compliance score in the controlgroup was 4.00 (2.00, 5.00), while that in the observation group was 5.00 (4.00, 5.00); compliance in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, the observation group demonstrated a higher first-attempt success rate and a shorter mean examination time compared with the control group, with statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A multimodal psychosocial nursing intervention administered before MRI examination effectively reduces periprocedural state anxiety and physiological stress responses in patients with optic neuritis. This approach may have broader applicability for improving patient compliance and MRI examination efficiency in other conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"87 9","pages":"58251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/BJHM58251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosing and monitoring optic neuritis. However, the procedure itself may induce significant anxiety in patients, potentially compromising examination compliance and image quality. This study retrospectively evaluated the effects of a structured, multimodal pre-MRI psychosocial nursing intervention on anxiety and compliance in patients with optic neuritis.

Methods: A total of 106 patients diagnosed with optic neuritis who underwent MRI at Jiaozhou Central Hospital of Qingdao between June 2021 and June 2024 were included. Patients were allocated to two groups based on the type of nursing intervention received before the MRI: the control group received routine nursing intervention, while the observation group received a comprehensive intervention comprising four core components: structured health education, individualized psychological support, environmental and emotional support, and family guidance. The Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were administered at baseline to assess the comparability of general psychological status between groups. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form-1 (STAI-1) was used to evaluate periprocedural state anxiety before and after the intervention. Physiological indicators, including heart rate and blood pressure as anxiety-related stress indicators, and oxygen saturation as a safety parameter, as well as examination compliance, were compared between the two groups. Compliance was assessed by MRI technicians using a 5-point scale based on image clarity and motion artifacts, with higher scores indicating better cooperation.

Results: Baseline SAS, SDS, and STAI-1 scores did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05), indicating comparability in general psychological status and pre-intervention anxiety levels. Following the intervention, the STAI-1 score (43.16 ± 2.85) in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group (p < 0.001). Additionally, the observation group exhibited significantly lower post-intervention heart rate and blood pressure compared with the control group (p < 0.05). The compliance score in the controlgroup was 4.00 (2.00, 5.00), while that in the observation group was 5.00 (4.00, 5.00); compliance in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the observation group demonstrated a higher first-attempt success rate and a shorter mean examination time compared with the control group, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: A multimodal psychosocial nursing intervention administered before MRI examination effectively reduces periprocedural state anxiety and physiological stress responses in patients with optic neuritis. This approach may have broader applicability for improving patient compliance and MRI examination efficiency in other conditions.

mri前多模式心理社会护理干预对视神经炎患者焦虑及检查依从性的影响。
目的/背景:磁共振成像(MRI)是诊断和监测视神经炎的必要手段。然而,手术本身可能会引起患者明显的焦虑,潜在地损害检查依从性和图像质量。本研究回顾性评估了结构化、多模式mri前心理社会护理干预对视神经炎患者焦虑和依从性的影响。方法:选取2021年6月至2024年6月在青岛市胶州中心医院行MRI检查的视神经炎患者106例。根据患者在MRI检查前接受的护理干预类型分为两组:对照组接受常规护理干预,观察组接受由结构化健康教育、个性化心理支持、环境与情感支持、家庭指导四个核心组成的综合干预。基线采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评估两组间一般心理状态的可比性。采用状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI-1)评估干预前后的围手术期状态焦虑。比较两组患者的生理指标,包括作为焦虑相关应激指标的心率和血压,以及作为安全参数的血氧饱和度,以及检查依从性。依从性由核磁共振技术人员使用基于图像清晰度和运动伪影的5分制来评估,分数越高表明合作越好。结果:两组患者SAS、SDS、sti -1基线评分差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05),说明两组患者一般心理状态及干预前焦虑水平具有可比性。干预后,观察组患者sti -1评分(43.16±2.85)显著低于对照组(p < 0.001)。观察组患者干预后心率、血压均显著低于对照组(p < 0.05)。对照组依从性评分为4.00(2.00,5.00),观察组依从性评分为5.00 (4.00,5.00);观察组患者治疗依从性显著高于对照组(p < 0.05)。观察组首次尝试成功率高于对照组,平均检查时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:MRI检查前多模式心理社会护理干预可有效降低视神经炎患者术中焦虑状态和生理应激反应。该方法在提高其他情况下患者依从性和MRI检查效率方面可能具有更广泛的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书