Blood pressure in adults with a functionally univentricular circulation who underwent either a Fontan procedure or a total cavo-pulmonary connection in childhood. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rajendra P Raghuraman, Armia Ebeid, Radek Debiec, Aidan Bolger, Iain Squire, Alison Harte, Amitha Puranik, Frances Bu'Lock
{"title":"Blood pressure in adults with a functionally univentricular circulation who underwent either a Fontan procedure or a total cavo-pulmonary connection in childhood. A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Rajendra P Raghuraman, Armia Ebeid, Radek Debiec, Aidan Bolger, Iain Squire, Alison Harte, Amitha Puranik, Frances Bu'Lock","doi":"10.1017/S1047951126123579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults with a Fontan procedure or total cavo-pulmonary connection (TCPC) have been shown to have abnormalities in their microcirculation (capillary rarefaction) and increased aortic stiffness. These are also a hallmark of essential hypertension. It remains unclear whether the blood pressure of Fontan patients differs from the general population. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis in Fontan patients comparing blood pressure against healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of peer-reviewed publications for \"Fontan adults\" studies, including patients >=16 years of age, with a previous Fontan/TCPC and containing blood pressure data for both Fontan adults and controls, was included. The trial strategy was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022355781). MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane (CENTRAL) database searches yielded 2168 records. Heterogeneity was assessed with Higgins <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic with a value >50% indicative of high heterogeneity and <i>P</i> values based on Cochran's Q test. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies contained sufficient blood pressure data from 544 Fontan/TCPC adults. Their weighted mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was 114 ± 14 mmHg and 69 ± 9 mmHg. Only four (130 patients) studies, were suitable for meta-analysis. Weighted mean difference in systolic BP was -1.36 mmHg (95% CI, -9 to 6.38) and in diastolic BP was +0.89 mmHg (95% CI, -2.92 to 4.70) between Fontan/TCPC patients and controls. A high level of heterogeneity in both SBP (<i>P</i> < 0.00001) and DBP (<i>P</i> < 0.003) was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither systolic nor diastolic blood pressure in adults with a Fontan circulation differ from healthy controls. Overall weighted means of blood pressure were comparable for similar age groups. Arterial hypertension does not appear to explain the capillary rarefaction and aortic stiffness found in adults with a Fontan procedure or total cavo-pulmonary connection. Further studies are required to explore other causes of their vascular remodelling.</p>","PeriodicalId":9435,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in the Young","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in the Young","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951126123579","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adults with a Fontan procedure or total cavo-pulmonary connection (TCPC) have been shown to have abnormalities in their microcirculation (capillary rarefaction) and increased aortic stiffness. These are also a hallmark of essential hypertension. It remains unclear whether the blood pressure of Fontan patients differs from the general population. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis in Fontan patients comparing blood pressure against healthy controls.

Methods: A systematic search of peer-reviewed publications for "Fontan adults" studies, including patients >=16 years of age, with a previous Fontan/TCPC and containing blood pressure data for both Fontan adults and controls, was included. The trial strategy was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022355781). MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane (CENTRAL) database searches yielded 2168 records. Heterogeneity was assessed with Higgins I2 statistic with a value >50% indicative of high heterogeneity and P values based on Cochran's Q test. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect size.

Results: Eleven studies contained sufficient blood pressure data from 544 Fontan/TCPC adults. Their weighted mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was 114 ± 14 mmHg and 69 ± 9 mmHg. Only four (130 patients) studies, were suitable for meta-analysis. Weighted mean difference in systolic BP was -1.36 mmHg (95% CI, -9 to 6.38) and in diastolic BP was +0.89 mmHg (95% CI, -2.92 to 4.70) between Fontan/TCPC patients and controls. A high level of heterogeneity in both SBP (P < 0.00001) and DBP (P < 0.003) was noted.

Conclusion: Neither systolic nor diastolic blood pressure in adults with a Fontan circulation differ from healthy controls. Overall weighted means of blood pressure were comparable for similar age groups. Arterial hypertension does not appear to explain the capillary rarefaction and aortic stiffness found in adults with a Fontan procedure or total cavo-pulmonary connection. Further studies are required to explore other causes of their vascular remodelling.

儿童期接受Fontan手术或全腔肺连接的单室循环功能成年人的血压。系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:接受Fontan手术或全腔肺连接(TCPC)的成年人微循环异常(毛细血管稀疏)和主动脉僵硬度增加。这些也是原发性高血压的标志。目前尚不清楚Fontan患者的血压是否与一般人群不同。因此,我们对Fontan患者进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,将血压与健康对照进行了比较。方法:系统检索同行评审的“Fontan成人”研究出版物,包括>=16岁的患者,既往Fontan/TCPC,并包含Fontan成人和对照组的血压数据。该试验策略已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42022355781)。MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane (CENTRAL)数据库检索得到2168条记录。异质性评估采用Higgins I2统计量,值为bbb50 %表示异质性高,P值基于Cochran’s Q检验。采用随机效应模型计算合并效应大小。结果:11项研究包含544名Fontan/TCPC成人的足够血压数据。加权平均收缩压和舒张压分别为114±14 mmHg和69±9 mmHg。只有4项(130例患者)研究适合进行meta分析。Fontan/TCPC患者与对照组的收缩压加权平均差异为-1.36 mmHg (95% CI, -9至6.38),舒张压加权平均差异为+0.89 mmHg (95% CI, -2.92至4.70)。收缩压(P < 0.00001)和舒张压(P < 0.003)均存在高度异质性。结论:Fontan循环的成人收缩压和舒张压与健康对照无差异。在相似年龄组中,血压的总体加权平均值具有可比性。动脉高压似乎不能解释成人Fontan手术或全腔肺连接的毛细血管稀疏和主动脉僵硬。需要进一步的研究来探索其血管重构的其他原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology in the Young
Cardiology in the Young 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
715
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology in the Young is devoted to cardiovascular issues affecting the young, and the older patient suffering the sequels of congenital heart disease, or other cardiac diseases acquired in childhood. The journal serves the interests of all professionals concerned with these topics. By design, the journal is international and multidisciplinary in its approach, and members of the editorial board take an active role in the its mission, helping to make it the essential journal in paediatric cardiology. All aspects of paediatric cardiology are covered within the journal. The content includes original articles, brief reports, editorials, reviews, and papers devoted to continuing professional development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书