The spatial mandibular triangle framework for quantifying structural and positional features of mandibular asymmetry: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Lingbo Lu, Wen Tang, Jinyi Zhu, Xinyao Qian, Hu Li, Yingji Zhou, Lizhe Xie, Bin Yan
{"title":"The spatial mandibular triangle framework for quantifying structural and positional features of mandibular asymmetry: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.","authors":"Lingbo Lu, Wen Tang, Jinyi Zhu, Xinyao Qian, Hu Li, Yingji Zhou, Lizhe Xie, Bin Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00784-026-07188-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and internally validate the Spatial Mandibular Triangle (SMT), a novel geometric framework that quantifies morphological and positional features of mandibular asymmetry.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study initially included 416 eligible participants. After expert assessment, 17 cases with discordant expert classifications were excluded, leaving 399 participants for analysis: 273 with mandibular asymmetry and 126 controls. A simplified SMT was constructed using bilateral condylar centers and menton. Two dimensionless indices were derived: the Structural Mandibular Asymmetry Index (SMAI), reflecting morphological asymmetry, and the Positional Mandibular Asymmetry Index (PMAI), reflecting spatial displacement. The discriminative performance of each index was evaluated against its corresponding expert-concordant classifications using receiver operating characteristic analysis, stratified 5-fold cross-validation, and bootstrap resampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with mandibular asymmetry exhibited higher SMAI and PMAI values than controls. Within the mandibular asymmetry cohort, SMAI discriminated severe from mild-to-moderate structural asymmetry with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.932, yielding an exploratory cutoff of 2.9% at the 95% specificity criterion. PMAI identified clinically significant positional asymmetry with an AUC of 0.961, yielding an exploratory cutoff of 3.9% at the 95% sensitivity criterion. Bootstrap resampling supported the stability of the threshold estimates, and cross-validation showed consistent cutoff ranges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SMT framework provides complementary three-dimensional quantification of structural and positional features of mandibular asymmetry. SMAI and PMAI showed promising discriminative performance in internal validation.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>SMT-based phenotyping may provide complementary quantitative information for characterizing the structural and positional features of mandibular asymmetry and may support comprehensive clinical assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"30 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-07188-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and internally validate the Spatial Mandibular Triangle (SMT), a novel geometric framework that quantifies morphological and positional features of mandibular asymmetry.

Materials and methods: This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study initially included 416 eligible participants. After expert assessment, 17 cases with discordant expert classifications were excluded, leaving 399 participants for analysis: 273 with mandibular asymmetry and 126 controls. A simplified SMT was constructed using bilateral condylar centers and menton. Two dimensionless indices were derived: the Structural Mandibular Asymmetry Index (SMAI), reflecting morphological asymmetry, and the Positional Mandibular Asymmetry Index (PMAI), reflecting spatial displacement. The discriminative performance of each index was evaluated against its corresponding expert-concordant classifications using receiver operating characteristic analysis, stratified 5-fold cross-validation, and bootstrap resampling.

Results: Participants with mandibular asymmetry exhibited higher SMAI and PMAI values than controls. Within the mandibular asymmetry cohort, SMAI discriminated severe from mild-to-moderate structural asymmetry with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.932, yielding an exploratory cutoff of 2.9% at the 95% specificity criterion. PMAI identified clinically significant positional asymmetry with an AUC of 0.961, yielding an exploratory cutoff of 3.9% at the 95% sensitivity criterion. Bootstrap resampling supported the stability of the threshold estimates, and cross-validation showed consistent cutoff ranges.

Conclusions: The SMT framework provides complementary three-dimensional quantification of structural and positional features of mandibular asymmetry. SMAI and PMAI showed promising discriminative performance in internal validation.

Clinical relevance: SMT-based phenotyping may provide complementary quantitative information for characterizing the structural and positional features of mandibular asymmetry and may support comprehensive clinical assessment.

用于量化下颌不对称结构和位置特征的空间下颌三角形框架:回顾性诊断准确性研究。
目的:发展和内部验证空间下颌三角形(SMT),一个新的几何框架,量化下颌不对称的形态和位置特征。材料和方法:这项回顾性诊断准确性研究最初包括416名符合条件的参与者。专家评估后,排除了17例专家分类不一致的病例,留下399名参与者进行分析:273名下颌不对称患者和126名对照组。采用双侧髁中心和颏部构建简化的SMT。导出了反映形态不对称的结构下颌不对称指数(SMAI)和反映空间位移的位置下颌不对称指数(PMAI)两个无量纲指标。每个指标的判别性能根据其相应的专家一致性分类进行评估,使用接收者操作特征分析,分层5倍交叉验证和自举重抽样。结果:下颌不对称患者的SMAI和PMAI值高于对照组。在下颌不对称队列中,SMAI区分重度和轻度至中度结构不对称的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.932,在95%特异性标准下的探索性截止值为2.9%。PMAI鉴定出具有临床意义的位置不对称,AUC为0.961,在95%敏感性标准下的探索性截止值为3.9%。自举重采样支持阈值估计的稳定性,交叉验证显示一致的截止范围。结论:SMT框架为下颌不对称的结构和位置特征提供了互补的三维量化。在内部验证中,SMAI和PMAI表现出良好的判别性能。临床相关性:基于smt的表型分析可以为描述下颌不对称的结构和位置特征提供补充的定量信息,并可能支持全面的临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书