Jack W Klein, William J Bingley, Matthew J Hornsey, William B Swann
{"title":"Toward a Unified Theory of Group Connection.","authors":"Jack W Klein, William J Bingley, Matthew J Hornsey, William B Swann","doi":"10.1146/annurev-psych-020226-033620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioral scientists have long been struck by the human tendency to connect with other individuals and groups. Three major approaches to group connection have been advanced: (<i>a</i>) the social cohesion approach, (<i>b</i>) the social identity approach, and (<i>c</i>) identity fusion theory. While each approach has garnered support, no one has attempted to integrate them. We address the need for integration by proposing a general theoretical framework that specifies the unique contributions of each approach, identifies the psychological phenomena each best explains, and reconciles theoretical inconsistencies. We then propose a network model that spells out how different aspects of the self-concept, in accordance with key insights from the three approaches, engender group connection.</p>","PeriodicalId":8010,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":41.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020226-033620","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Behavioral scientists have long been struck by the human tendency to connect with other individuals and groups. Three major approaches to group connection have been advanced: (a) the social cohesion approach, (b) the social identity approach, and (c) identity fusion theory. While each approach has garnered support, no one has attempted to integrate them. We address the need for integration by proposing a general theoretical framework that specifies the unique contributions of each approach, identifies the psychological phenomena each best explains, and reconciles theoretical inconsistencies. We then propose a network model that spells out how different aspects of the self-concept, in accordance with key insights from the three approaches, engender group connection.
期刊介绍:
The Annual Review of Psychology, a publication that has been available since 1950, provides comprehensive coverage of the latest advancements in psychological research. It encompasses a wide range of topics, including the biological underpinnings of human behavior, the intricacies of our senses and perception, the functioning of the mind, animal behavior and learning, human development, psychopathology, clinical and counseling psychology, social psychology, personality, environmental psychology, community psychology, and much more. In a recent development, the current volume of this esteemed journal has transitioned from a subscription-based model to an open access format as part of the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open initiative. As a result, all articles published in this volume are now freely accessible to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.