{"title":"A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Effects of Stress on Epigenetic Aging.","authors":"Zachary M Harvanek, Rajita Sinha","doi":"10.1146/annurev-psych-020226-034950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stress is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of aging-related health outcomes, yet the pathways linking stress to epigenetic aging remain ill-defined. Here, we outline a multilevel conceptual framework of stress, where stressors interact with resilience (e.g., emotion regulation, social support) and vulnerability to shape acute and repeated or sustained stress responses that mediate long-term aging trajectories. In the context of this framework, we evaluate the evidence across childhood adversity, traumatic events, chronic stressors, and social determinants of health and identify generally consistent effects of stressors on increased epigenetic age in second- and third-generation clocks, which are moderated by resilience and vulnerability. We find clear evidence for mediation of these effects via maladaptive behavioral stress responses as well as more nuanced results suggesting links between maladaptive psychological and physiological stress response pathways and increased epigenetic age. We conclude with recommendations to harmonize stress measurement, analytic approaches, and clock selection using this conceptual framework to advance our mechanistic understanding of the relationship between stress and epigenetic aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":8010,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":41.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020226-034950","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stress is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of aging-related health outcomes, yet the pathways linking stress to epigenetic aging remain ill-defined. Here, we outline a multilevel conceptual framework of stress, where stressors interact with resilience (e.g., emotion regulation, social support) and vulnerability to shape acute and repeated or sustained stress responses that mediate long-term aging trajectories. In the context of this framework, we evaluate the evidence across childhood adversity, traumatic events, chronic stressors, and social determinants of health and identify generally consistent effects of stressors on increased epigenetic age in second- and third-generation clocks, which are moderated by resilience and vulnerability. We find clear evidence for mediation of these effects via maladaptive behavioral stress responses as well as more nuanced results suggesting links between maladaptive psychological and physiological stress response pathways and increased epigenetic age. We conclude with recommendations to harmonize stress measurement, analytic approaches, and clock selection using this conceptual framework to advance our mechanistic understanding of the relationship between stress and epigenetic aging.
期刊介绍:
The Annual Review of Psychology, a publication that has been available since 1950, provides comprehensive coverage of the latest advancements in psychological research. It encompasses a wide range of topics, including the biological underpinnings of human behavior, the intricacies of our senses and perception, the functioning of the mind, animal behavior and learning, human development, psychopathology, clinical and counseling psychology, social psychology, personality, environmental psychology, community psychology, and much more. In a recent development, the current volume of this esteemed journal has transitioned from a subscription-based model to an open access format as part of the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open initiative. As a result, all articles published in this volume are now freely accessible to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.