A SHAP-Based Interpretable Model for MDRO-Infection Risk in Chronically Multimorbid Middle-Aged and Elderly ICU Adults.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rong Zhao, Meng Zhao, Yixing Wang, Xianyun Zhang, Jiaoping Zhang, Jun Ge, Jianxing Yue, Yang Xu, Qiankun Liu
{"title":"A SHAP-Based Interpretable Model for MDRO-Infection Risk in Chronically Multimorbid Middle-Aged and Elderly ICU Adults.","authors":"Rong Zhao, Meng Zhao, Yixing Wang, Xianyun Zhang, Jiaoping Zhang, Jun Ge, Jianxing Yue, Yang Xu, Qiankun Liu","doi":"10.31083/BJHM58253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/background: </strong>Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infection poses a significant clinical challenge, resulting in poor outcomes for middle-aged and older intensive care unit (ICU) patients with chronic multimorbidity. While conventional prediction models can identify high-risk patients, they often lack transparency in clinical decision-making. To bridge this gap, we aimed to develop a prediction model that incorporates Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)-based explainability analysis. This approach aims to achieve accurate risk prediction while quantitatively assessing the contribution of each risk factor, thereby providing clear guidance for clinical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a hospital-based consecutive sampling strategy to enroll 314 middle-aged and older patients with chronic multimorbidity admitted to the intensive care units of three Grade A tertiary hospitals and one secondary hospital in Bengbu, Anhui, from May 2024 to May 2025. Based on standard diagnostic criteria for MDROs, patients were categorized into an MDRO infection group and a non-MDRO infection group. Twenty candidate variables potentially associated with MDRO infection were extracted from electronic medical record systems. Univariate analysis, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, and multivariable logistic regression were utilized to identify high-risk factors for MDRO infection. The model's discriminative ability and calibration were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Internal validation was performed through bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations). We compared logistic regression, Naive Bayes, support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) models, selecting the optimal model for SHAP analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between the two groups in age, length of hospital stay, admission diagnosis, history of antibiotic use, blood transfusion history, catheter category and number, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and other indices. (2) Variables identified as significant in univariate analysis were further analyzed using LASSO regression, which pinpointed eight predictors with non-zero coefficients; these were included in multivariable logistic regression for refined selection. (3) ROC analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated strong model performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.906 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.896-0.912), sensitivity of 77.92%, and specificity of 88.46%. Bootstrap internal validation confirmed that the model retained satisfactory discriminative ability. (4) Among the models compared, logistic regression demonstrated high predictive accuracy along with superior interpretability and stability, making it the chosen model for detailed analysis. A nomogram was developed based on seven key predictors: age, length of hospital stay, admission diagnosis, history of antibiotic use, tracheostomy, C-reactive protein, and white blood cell count. (5) SHAP analysis revealed that history of antibiotic use, length of hospital stay, and age were the most significant factors for MDRO infection among ICU patients with chronic multimorbidity, with antibiotic exposure identified as the strongest contributor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prediction model developed in this study demonstrates strong predictive performance for in-hospital MDRO infection in ICU patients with chronic multimorbidity. It serves as a preliminary tool for identifying high-risk patients and may facilitate early risk stratification and targeted prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"87 9","pages":"58253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/BJHM58253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/background: Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infection poses a significant clinical challenge, resulting in poor outcomes for middle-aged and older intensive care unit (ICU) patients with chronic multimorbidity. While conventional prediction models can identify high-risk patients, they often lack transparency in clinical decision-making. To bridge this gap, we aimed to develop a prediction model that incorporates Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)-based explainability analysis. This approach aims to achieve accurate risk prediction while quantitatively assessing the contribution of each risk factor, thereby providing clear guidance for clinical intervention.

Methods: We employed a hospital-based consecutive sampling strategy to enroll 314 middle-aged and older patients with chronic multimorbidity admitted to the intensive care units of three Grade A tertiary hospitals and one secondary hospital in Bengbu, Anhui, from May 2024 to May 2025. Based on standard diagnostic criteria for MDROs, patients were categorized into an MDRO infection group and a non-MDRO infection group. Twenty candidate variables potentially associated with MDRO infection were extracted from electronic medical record systems. Univariate analysis, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, and multivariable logistic regression were utilized to identify high-risk factors for MDRO infection. The model's discriminative ability and calibration were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Internal validation was performed through bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations). We compared logistic regression, Naive Bayes, support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) models, selecting the optimal model for SHAP analysis.

Results: (1) Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between the two groups in age, length of hospital stay, admission diagnosis, history of antibiotic use, blood transfusion history, catheter category and number, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and other indices. (2) Variables identified as significant in univariate analysis were further analyzed using LASSO regression, which pinpointed eight predictors with non-zero coefficients; these were included in multivariable logistic regression for refined selection. (3) ROC analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated strong model performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.906 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.896-0.912), sensitivity of 77.92%, and specificity of 88.46%. Bootstrap internal validation confirmed that the model retained satisfactory discriminative ability. (4) Among the models compared, logistic regression demonstrated high predictive accuracy along with superior interpretability and stability, making it the chosen model for detailed analysis. A nomogram was developed based on seven key predictors: age, length of hospital stay, admission diagnosis, history of antibiotic use, tracheostomy, C-reactive protein, and white blood cell count. (5) SHAP analysis revealed that history of antibiotic use, length of hospital stay, and age were the most significant factors for MDRO infection among ICU patients with chronic multimorbidity, with antibiotic exposure identified as the strongest contributor.

Conclusion: The prediction model developed in this study demonstrates strong predictive performance for in-hospital MDRO infection in ICU patients with chronic multimorbidity. It serves as a preliminary tool for identifying high-risk patients and may facilitate early risk stratification and targeted prevention strategies.

基于shap的慢性多病中老年ICU成人mdro感染风险可解释模型
目的/背景:多药耐药菌(MDRO)感染是一项重大的临床挑战,导致中老年重症监护病房(ICU)慢性多病患者预后不佳。虽然传统的预测模型可以识别高危患者,但它们在临床决策中往往缺乏透明度。为了弥补这一差距,我们的目标是开发一个预测模型,该模型结合了基于Shapley加性解释(SHAP)的可解释性分析。该方法旨在实现准确的风险预测,定量评估各风险因素的贡献,为临床干预提供明确的指导。方法:采用以医院为基础的连续抽样策略,于2024年5月至2025年5月在安徽省蚌埠市3所三级甲等医院和1所二级医院重症监护室就诊的314例中老年慢性多病患者。根据MDRO的标准诊断标准,将患者分为MDRO感染组和非MDRO感染组。从电子病历系统中提取了20个可能与MDRO感染相关的候选变量。采用单因素分析、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归和多变量logistic回归来确定MDRO感染的高危因素。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验评估模型的判别能力和校正能力。内部验证通过自举重采样(1000次迭代)进行。我们比较了逻辑回归、朴素贝叶斯、支持向量机(SVM)、决策树、线性判别分析(LDA)和二次判别分析(QDA)模型,选择了最优模型进行SHAP分析。结果:(1)单因素分析显示,两组患者在年龄、住院时间、入院诊断、抗生素使用史、输血史、导管种类及数量、机械通气、气管造口、白细胞计数、c反应蛋白等指标上存在显著差异。(2)进一步利用LASSO回归对单因素分析中发现的显著变量进行分析,确定了8个非零系数的预测因子;这些都包括在多变量逻辑回归中进行精细选择。(3) ROC分析和Hosmer-Lemeshow检验显示模型表现良好,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.906(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.896 ~ 0.912),敏感性77.92%,特异性88.46%。Bootstrap内部验证表明,该模型具有良好的判别能力。(4)在所比较的模型中,逻辑回归模型具有较高的预测精度、较好的可解释性和稳定性,是详细分析的选择模型。基于7个关键预测因素:年龄、住院时间、入院诊断、抗生素使用史、气管造口术、c反应蛋白和白细胞计数,建立了nomogram。(5) SHAP分析显示,抗生素使用史、住院时间和年龄是ICU慢性多病患者MDRO感染的最重要因素,抗生素暴露是最重要的影响因素。结论:本研究建立的预测模型对慢性多病ICU患者院内MDRO感染具有较强的预测能力。它可以作为识别高危患者的初步工具,并可能促进早期风险分层和有针对性的预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书