Socioeconomic Disparities in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Extracorporeal Support.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Luiz Marcelo Almeida de Araujo, Elliot Richard Haut, Glenn J R Whitman, Sung-Min Cho
{"title":"Socioeconomic Disparities in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Extracorporeal Support.","authors":"Luiz Marcelo Almeida de Araujo, Elliot Richard Haut, Glenn J R Whitman, Sung-Min Cho","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a resource-intensive therapy that can be used in severe cardiogenic shock (CS). Socioeconomic factors are known determinants of cardiovascular outcomes, yet their association with mortality among patients receiving mechanical circulatory support remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample, including adult hospitalizations with CS receiving VA-ECMO between 2018 and 2022. Exposure was Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP) code-level median household income quartile. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We used multivariable regression to estimate risk ratios and Cox-proportional hazards for time-to-event analyses, adjusting for confounders. The 3,032 hospitalizations were evenly distributed across income quartiles. Compared with the lowest-income quartile, the adjusted mortality risk ratio of the second (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.09) and third quartiles (aRR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84-1.05) had no significant difference. The highest-income quartile had a significantly lower risk of in-hospital mortality (aRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94). Time-to-event analyses showed a lower adjusted hazard of death for the fourth versus first quartile (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.89), whereas second and third quartiles were not significantly different. These findings suggest that disparities persist among patients receiving resource-intensive life-support therapies, highlighting the need to measure socioeconomic variables and address structural factors influencing outcomes in critical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a resource-intensive therapy that can be used in severe cardiogenic shock (CS). Socioeconomic factors are known determinants of cardiovascular outcomes, yet their association with mortality among patients receiving mechanical circulatory support remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample, including adult hospitalizations with CS receiving VA-ECMO between 2018 and 2022. Exposure was Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP) code-level median household income quartile. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We used multivariable regression to estimate risk ratios and Cox-proportional hazards for time-to-event analyses, adjusting for confounders. The 3,032 hospitalizations were evenly distributed across income quartiles. Compared with the lowest-income quartile, the adjusted mortality risk ratio of the second (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.09) and third quartiles (aRR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84-1.05) had no significant difference. The highest-income quartile had a significantly lower risk of in-hospital mortality (aRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94). Time-to-event analyses showed a lower adjusted hazard of death for the fourth versus first quartile (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.89), whereas second and third quartiles were not significantly different. These findings suggest that disparities persist among patients receiving resource-intensive life-support therapies, highlighting the need to measure socioeconomic variables and address structural factors influencing outcomes in critical care.

体外支持治疗心源性休克患者的社会经济差异。
静脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)是一种资源密集型治疗方法,可用于严重心源性休克(CS)。社会经济因素是已知的心血管结局的决定因素,但其与接受机械循环支持的患者死亡率的关系尚不清楚。我们使用医疗成本和利用项目国家住院患者样本进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括2018年至2022年间接受VA-ECMO的成人CS住院患者。暴露是区域改善计划(ZIP)代码水平的中位数家庭收入四分位数。主要终点是住院死亡率。我们使用多变量回归来估计风险比和Cox-proportional hazard用于时间-事件分析,调整混杂因素。3032例住院治疗平均分布在收入四分位数中。与最低收入四分位数相比,第二和第三四分位数的调整死亡率风险比(调整风险比[aRR], 0.97; 95%可信区间[CI], 0.86-1.09)无显著差异。收入最高的四分位数的住院死亡率风险显著降低(aRR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94)。时间-事件分析显示,第四个四分位数的校正死亡风险低于第一个四分位数(校正风险比[aHR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.89),而第二个和第三个四分位数无显著差异。这些发现表明,在接受资源密集型生命支持治疗的患者中,差异仍然存在,强调需要衡量社会经济变量,并解决影响重症监护结果的结构性因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书