New perspectives on tropical grassy biomes and the trophic consequences of the evolution of grass.

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
William J Bond
{"title":"New perspectives on tropical grassy biomes and the trophic consequences of the evolution of grass.","authors":"William J Bond","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcag120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biomes are physiognomically distinct large vegetation units traditionally defined by climate. Yet, grassy biomes differ by growing in diverse climates and on diverse soils. Consequently they were long assumed to be secondary vegetation produced by human deforestation. However, since the new millennium, studies have shown grassy biomes have endemic species-rich biotas contradicting their supposed recent origin. Here I review novel perspectives on the nature of tropical grassy biomes, how they are maintained where forests can also grow and why the evolution of grasses displaced ancient forests.</p><p><strong>Scope: </strong>A significant problem is defining grassy biomes as distinct from forests. Controversy over definitions has contributed to the lack of a widely accepted global grassland map. Nevertheless, generalizations from studies from diverse regions are that ancient grasslands have diverse floras, especially rich in herbaceous plants. Plants are adapted to high sunlight and frequent disturbance contrasting with forest taxa. Plant adaptations to grassland disturbances depend on whether mammalian herbivory or fire is the dominant disturbance. There is considerable interest in which grassy biomes could potentially switch to forests for sequestering carbon. The new perspective is that neither site nor disturbance predicts tree densities but rather their interaction. Predicting potential tree biomass remains controversial with little consensus among methods and many failing to include fire or herbivory. Alternative stable state theory has been applied as an explanation for forest/grassy biome mosaics driven by frequent fires.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evolution of grasses has been transformative in creating grassy biomes by promoting novel trophic interactions with grazing mammals and grass-fuelled fire regimes. The extirpation of large mammals by humans and their replacement by livestock, and human-driven changes in grassland fire regimes are altering the domain of grassy biomes. An understanding of the unique features of grassy biomes can contribute to wiser management in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biomes are physiognomically distinct large vegetation units traditionally defined by climate. Yet, grassy biomes differ by growing in diverse climates and on diverse soils. Consequently they were long assumed to be secondary vegetation produced by human deforestation. However, since the new millennium, studies have shown grassy biomes have endemic species-rich biotas contradicting their supposed recent origin. Here I review novel perspectives on the nature of tropical grassy biomes, how they are maintained where forests can also grow and why the evolution of grasses displaced ancient forests.

Scope: A significant problem is defining grassy biomes as distinct from forests. Controversy over definitions has contributed to the lack of a widely accepted global grassland map. Nevertheless, generalizations from studies from diverse regions are that ancient grasslands have diverse floras, especially rich in herbaceous plants. Plants are adapted to high sunlight and frequent disturbance contrasting with forest taxa. Plant adaptations to grassland disturbances depend on whether mammalian herbivory or fire is the dominant disturbance. There is considerable interest in which grassy biomes could potentially switch to forests for sequestering carbon. The new perspective is that neither site nor disturbance predicts tree densities but rather their interaction. Predicting potential tree biomass remains controversial with little consensus among methods and many failing to include fire or herbivory. Alternative stable state theory has been applied as an explanation for forest/grassy biome mosaics driven by frequent fires.

Conclusions: The evolution of grasses has been transformative in creating grassy biomes by promoting novel trophic interactions with grazing mammals and grass-fuelled fire regimes. The extirpation of large mammals by humans and their replacement by livestock, and human-driven changes in grassland fire regimes are altering the domain of grassy biomes. An understanding of the unique features of grassy biomes can contribute to wiser management in the future.

热带草地生物群落的新视角及草地进化的营养后果。
背景:生物群落是传统上由气候定义的具有明显地貌特征的大型植被单位。然而,草类生物群落因生长在不同的气候和土壤中而有所不同。因此,它们长期以来被认为是人类砍伐森林产生的次生植被。然而,自新千年以来,研究表明,草类生物群落具有特有的物种丰富的生物区系,这与它们所谓的最近起源相矛盾。在这里,我回顾了关于热带草类生物群落性质的新观点,它们是如何在森林也可以生长的地方维持的,以及为什么草类的进化取代了古老的森林。范围:一个重要的问题是将草类生物群落与森林区分开来。关于定义的争论导致了缺乏一个被广泛接受的全球草地地图。然而,从不同地区的研究中得出的结论是,古代草原的植物区系多样,尤其是草本植物丰富。与森林分类群相比,植物适应高日照和频繁干扰。植物对草地干扰的适应取决于主要干扰是食草动物还是火。人们对草类生物群落是否有可能转变为森林来固碳非常感兴趣。新的观点认为,无论是地点还是干扰都不能预测树木的密度,而是它们之间的相互作用。预测潜在的树木生物量仍然存在争议,方法之间几乎没有共识,许多方法没有包括火或草食。交替稳定状态理论被用于解释频繁火灾驱动的森林/草地生物群系镶嵌现象。结论:草的进化通过促进与放牧哺乳动物和草燃料火灾制度的新型营养相互作用,在创造草类生物群系方面具有变革性。人类对大型哺乳动物的灭绝和牲畜的取代,以及人类驱动的草原火灾制度的变化正在改变草地生物群落的领域。了解草类生物群落的独特特征有助于未来更明智的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书