Naibin Duan, Yumin Ma, Suping Kong, Zezhou Liu, Xinguo Li
{"title":"From morphological modules to lineage-derived subindividuals: integrating phenotypic, epigenetic and genetic differentiation in plants.","authors":"Naibin Duan, Yumin Ma, Suping Kong, Zezhou Liu, Xinguo Li","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcag312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Harper's (1977) framing of the plant as a population of semi-autonomous modules remains foundational but predates genomic tools able to test the genetic identity of individual modules. Two further literatures address within-plant heterogeneity largely in parallel: a genetic-mosaicism literature (Gill et al., 1995; Reusch et al., 2021) showing that somatic mutations accumulate within plants, and a subindividual-variation literature (Herrera, 2009; Sobral and Sampedro, 2022) documenting functional consequences of within-plant phenotypic and epigenetic diversity.</p><p><strong>Scope: </strong>We bridge these bodies of work within a single lineage-based framework. We define a plant subindividual as a cell-lineage-derived module with a traceable developmental history and partial autonomy, whose differentiation may be expressed at phenotypic, epigenetic and/or genetic levels; detectable somatic genetic divergence is not required for subindividual status. Drawing on whole-genome and methylome studies of long-lived trees, shrubs and clonal crops, we assess the strength of support at each level, distinguishing evidence for the existence of within-plant heterogeneity from evidence for its effects on module function. In the studies reviewed here, a causal link between somatic variants in signalling genes and module-specific physiological responses remains to be established. We then propose a distinct scaling hypothesis: for responses requiring rapid or pathway-specific signalling, increasing transport distance and vascular sectoriality may raise the relative contribution of local regulation-a testable account of why module autonomy may scale with plant size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reframing plant modules as lineage-derived subindividuals yields testable predictions comparing genetic, epigenetic and phenotypic differentiation across life histories-from mainly phenotypic and epigenetic differentiation in short-lived herbs to detectable genetic mosaicism in long-lived trees and clonal crops. The framework connects three lines of research and proposes a testable scaling hypothesis for module autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Harper's (1977) framing of the plant as a population of semi-autonomous modules remains foundational but predates genomic tools able to test the genetic identity of individual modules. Two further literatures address within-plant heterogeneity largely in parallel: a genetic-mosaicism literature (Gill et al., 1995; Reusch et al., 2021) showing that somatic mutations accumulate within plants, and a subindividual-variation literature (Herrera, 2009; Sobral and Sampedro, 2022) documenting functional consequences of within-plant phenotypic and epigenetic diversity.
Scope: We bridge these bodies of work within a single lineage-based framework. We define a plant subindividual as a cell-lineage-derived module with a traceable developmental history and partial autonomy, whose differentiation may be expressed at phenotypic, epigenetic and/or genetic levels; detectable somatic genetic divergence is not required for subindividual status. Drawing on whole-genome and methylome studies of long-lived trees, shrubs and clonal crops, we assess the strength of support at each level, distinguishing evidence for the existence of within-plant heterogeneity from evidence for its effects on module function. In the studies reviewed here, a causal link between somatic variants in signalling genes and module-specific physiological responses remains to be established. We then propose a distinct scaling hypothesis: for responses requiring rapid or pathway-specific signalling, increasing transport distance and vascular sectoriality may raise the relative contribution of local regulation-a testable account of why module autonomy may scale with plant size.
Conclusions: Reframing plant modules as lineage-derived subindividuals yields testable predictions comparing genetic, epigenetic and phenotypic differentiation across life histories-from mainly phenotypic and epigenetic differentiation in short-lived herbs to detectable genetic mosaicism in long-lived trees and clonal crops. The framework connects three lines of research and proposes a testable scaling hypothesis for module autonomy.
背景:Harper(1977)将植物作为半自主模块的群体框架仍然是基础,但早于能够测试单个模块遗传身份的基因组工具。另外两篇研究植物内部异质性的文献在很大程度上是平行的:一篇遗传嵌接文献(Gill et ., 1995; Reusch et al., 2021)表明体细胞突变在植物内部积累,另一篇亚个体变异文献(Herrera, 2009; Sobral and Sampedro, 2022)记录了植物内部表型和表观遗传多样性的功能后果。范围:我们在一个单一的基于谱系的框架中架起这些工作主体的桥梁。我们将植物亚个体定义为细胞谱系衍生的模块,具有可追溯的发育历史和部分自主性,其分化可能在表型,表观遗传和/或遗传水平上表达;可检测的体细胞遗传分化不需要亚个体状态。利用长寿树木、灌木和无性系作物的全基因组和甲基组研究,我们评估了每个水平上的支持强度,区分了植物内部异质性存在的证据和其对模块功能影响的证据。在这里回顾的研究中,信号基因的体细胞变异与模块特异性生理反应之间的因果关系仍有待建立。然后,我们提出了一个独特的尺度假设:对于需要快速或途径特异性信号的响应,增加运输距离和维管部门性可能会提高局部调节的相对贡献——这是一个可测试的解释,为什么模块自治可能随着植物大小而扩大。结论:将植物模块重新构建为谱系衍生的亚个体,可以通过比较生活史上的遗传、表观遗传和表型分化(从短寿草本植物的主要表型和表观遗传分化到长寿树木和无性系作物中可检测的遗传嵌合)得出可测试的预测。该框架连接了三个研究方向,并提出了一个可测试的模块自治尺度假设。
期刊介绍:
Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide.
The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.