Deep learning classification of radiologic pattern is associated with progression of interstitial lung abnormalities and with survival.

IF 21.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
David Baraghoshi, Devlin Thieke, Hiroto Hatabu, Gary M Hunninghake, Jonathan Rose, Rachel Putman, Gunnar Gudmundsson, Vilmundur Gudnason, Joshua J Solomon, Soonho Yoon, David A Lynch, Stephen M Humphries
{"title":"Deep learning classification of radiologic pattern is associated with progression of interstitial lung abnormalities and with survival.","authors":"David Baraghoshi, Devlin Thieke, Hiroto Hatabu, Gary M Hunninghake, Jonathan Rose, Rachel Putman, Gunnar Gudmundsson, Vilmundur Gudnason, Joshua J Solomon, Soonho Yoon, David A Lynch, Stephen M Humphries","doi":"10.1093/ajrccm/aamag525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) are common, but not all progress, highlighting the need for objective computed tomography (CT)-based biomarkers for risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether deep learning-based classification of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is associated with fibrosis progression and survival in individuals with ILA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline and follow-up CT scans from participants without clinically diagnosed interstitial lung disease in two large observational cohorts (COPDGene and AGES-Reykjavík) were analyzed using data-driven textural analysis (DTA) to quantify fibrosis and a deep learning-based classifier (MIL-UIP) to estimate UIP likelihood. Associations of baseline MIL-UIP with DTA trajectory and survival were evaluated using linear mixed and multivariable Cox models, respectively.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Baseline MIL-UIP > 0.5 was associated with relative annual DTA increases of 13.41% (95% CI: 8.10%, 18.99%; p < 0.001) and 14.10% (95% CI: 5.06%, 23.91%; p = 0.002) in COPDGene and AGES-Reykjavík, respectively. Each 0.1-point increase in MIL-UIP was associated with relative rates of DTA change that were 1.10 percentage points higher (95% CI: 0.45, 1.74; p < 0.001) in COPDGene and 1.30 percentage points higher (95% CI: 0.17, 2.45; p = 0.025) in AGES-Reykjavík. MIL-UIP > 0.5 was associated with higher mortality in COPDGene (HR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.38; p = 0.018) and AGES-Reykjavík (HR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.61; p = 0.046). Baseline DTA and MIL-UIP were highly associated with visual assessments of ILA, UIP, and fibrosis progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automated assessment of UIP-like CT features is associated with fibrosis progression and mortality in individuals with ILA, supporting its potential use for risk stratification and clinical trials enrichment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag525","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) are common, but not all progress, highlighting the need for objective computed tomography (CT)-based biomarkers for risk stratification.

Objective: To determine whether deep learning-based classification of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is associated with fibrosis progression and survival in individuals with ILA.

Methods: Baseline and follow-up CT scans from participants without clinically diagnosed interstitial lung disease in two large observational cohorts (COPDGene and AGES-Reykjavík) were analyzed using data-driven textural analysis (DTA) to quantify fibrosis and a deep learning-based classifier (MIL-UIP) to estimate UIP likelihood. Associations of baseline MIL-UIP with DTA trajectory and survival were evaluated using linear mixed and multivariable Cox models, respectively.

Measurements and main results: Baseline MIL-UIP > 0.5 was associated with relative annual DTA increases of 13.41% (95% CI: 8.10%, 18.99%; p < 0.001) and 14.10% (95% CI: 5.06%, 23.91%; p = 0.002) in COPDGene and AGES-Reykjavík, respectively. Each 0.1-point increase in MIL-UIP was associated with relative rates of DTA change that were 1.10 percentage points higher (95% CI: 0.45, 1.74; p < 0.001) in COPDGene and 1.30 percentage points higher (95% CI: 0.17, 2.45; p = 0.025) in AGES-Reykjavík. MIL-UIP > 0.5 was associated with higher mortality in COPDGene (HR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.38; p = 0.018) and AGES-Reykjavík (HR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.61; p = 0.046). Baseline DTA and MIL-UIP were highly associated with visual assessments of ILA, UIP, and fibrosis progression.

Conclusion: Automated assessment of UIP-like CT features is associated with fibrosis progression and mortality in individuals with ILA, supporting its potential use for risk stratification and clinical trials enrichment.

放射学模式的深度学习分类与间质性肺异常的进展和生存有关。
理由:间质性肺异常(ILA)很常见,但并非所有进展,强调需要基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的客观生物标志物进行风险分层。目的:确定基于深度学习的常见性间质性肺炎(UIP)分类是否与ILA患者的纤维化进展和生存相关。方法:在两个大型观察队列(COPDGene和AGES-Reykjavík)中,使用数据驱动的纹理分析(DTA)来量化纤维化,并使用基于深度学习的分类器(MIL-UIP)来估计UIP的可能性,对未临床诊断为间质性肺病的参与者的基线和随访CT扫描进行分析。分别使用线性混合和多变量Cox模型评估基线MIL-UIP与DTA轨迹和生存的关系。测量和主要结果:基线MIL-UIP >.5与相对年DTA增加13.41%相关(95% CI: 8.10%, 18.99%; p 0.5与COPDGene (HR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.38; p = 0.018)和AGES-Reykjavík (HR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.61; p = 0.046)较高的死亡率相关。基线DTA和MIL-UIP与ILA、UIP和纤维化进展的视觉评估高度相关。结论:自动评估uip样CT特征与ILA患者的纤维化进展和死亡率相关,支持其在风险分层和临床试验充实方面的潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书