Philip P. Mshelbwala, J. Scott Weese, Tasneem Imam, Harish K. Tiwari, Roland Suluku, Charles E. Rupprecht
{"title":"Sociodemographic and Dog-Management Factors Associated With Free-Roaming Dogs in Nigeria and Sierra Leone","authors":"Philip P. Mshelbwala, J. Scott Weese, Tasneem Imam, Harish K. Tiwari, Roland Suluku, Charles E. Rupprecht","doi":"10.1155/tbed/8621173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Free-roaming dogs (FRDs) pose a persistent challenge to canine rabies elimination in low- and middle-income countries, as conventional vaccination strategies often struggle to reach this population, which increases the risk of dog bites, rabies virus exposure and traffic accidents and complicates rabies control efforts. We conducted cross-sectional surveys in Nigeria and Sierra Leone and fitted country-specific probabilistic models to identify factors associated with FRD ownership. The proportion of FRDs was higher in Sierra Leone (78.7%; 95% CI: 77.1–80.3) than in Nigeria (58.5%; 95% CI: 58.2–61.2). In both countries, significant interactions between locality (urban versus rural), education level, access to veterinary services and dog vaccination status influenced FRD ownership. The probability of FRD ownership was higher among respondents with no formal education, particularly those living in rural areas with no access, or uncertain access, to veterinary services. In Nigeria, FRD ownership increased with household poverty. In Sierra Leone, it was highest in low-density rural areas, declined sharply with increasing population density and decreased with distance from roads. The interaction between literacy and primary education was associated with reduced FRD ownership, although neither variable was significant when considered independently. In both countries, owners with good rabies knowledge and owners of indigenous, rather than mixed-breed, dogs were more likely to own FRDs. Spatial variation in FRD ownership was evident in both countries. In Nigeria, dog owners in Kaduna and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) were less likely to own FRDs than those in Anambra and Enugu. In Sierra Leone, the probability of FRD ownership was substantially higher in northern than in southern regions. Based on human-to-dog ratios of 2.77:1 in Nigeria and 2.75:1 in Sierra Leone, we estimated dog populations of ~11.7–12.7 million and 666,000, respectively. These findings highlight the need for targeted public education on responsible dog ownership and effective dog management, alongside community-level interventions in rural and other high-risk areas to reduce FRD populations. The resulting population estimates provide valuable evidence for planning and implementing mass canine rabies vaccination programs in both countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13624544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/8621173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Free-roaming dogs (FRDs) pose a persistent challenge to canine rabies elimination in low- and middle-income countries, as conventional vaccination strategies often struggle to reach this population, which increases the risk of dog bites, rabies virus exposure and traffic accidents and complicates rabies control efforts. We conducted cross-sectional surveys in Nigeria and Sierra Leone and fitted country-specific probabilistic models to identify factors associated with FRD ownership. The proportion of FRDs was higher in Sierra Leone (78.7%; 95% CI: 77.1–80.3) than in Nigeria (58.5%; 95% CI: 58.2–61.2). In both countries, significant interactions between locality (urban versus rural), education level, access to veterinary services and dog vaccination status influenced FRD ownership. The probability of FRD ownership was higher among respondents with no formal education, particularly those living in rural areas with no access, or uncertain access, to veterinary services. In Nigeria, FRD ownership increased with household poverty. In Sierra Leone, it was highest in low-density rural areas, declined sharply with increasing population density and decreased with distance from roads. The interaction between literacy and primary education was associated with reduced FRD ownership, although neither variable was significant when considered independently. In both countries, owners with good rabies knowledge and owners of indigenous, rather than mixed-breed, dogs were more likely to own FRDs. Spatial variation in FRD ownership was evident in both countries. In Nigeria, dog owners in Kaduna and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) were less likely to own FRDs than those in Anambra and Enugu. In Sierra Leone, the probability of FRD ownership was substantially higher in northern than in southern regions. Based on human-to-dog ratios of 2.77:1 in Nigeria and 2.75:1 in Sierra Leone, we estimated dog populations of ~11.7–12.7 million and 666,000, respectively. These findings highlight the need for targeted public education on responsible dog ownership and effective dog management, alongside community-level interventions in rural and other high-risk areas to reduce FRD populations. The resulting population estimates provide valuable evidence for planning and implementing mass canine rabies vaccination programs in both countries.
期刊介绍:
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions):
Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread.
Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope.
Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies.
Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies).
Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.