Meghan Zimmer, Jennifer L Lerman, Emily S Krueger, Marissa M Shams-White, Christie Kaefer, Kirsten A Herrick, Jill Reedy
{"title":"Development and Mixed Methods User-Testing of the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) Report for Feedback to Research Participants.","authors":"Meghan Zimmer, Jennifer L Lerman, Emily S Krueger, Marissa M Shams-White, Christie Kaefer, Kirsten A Herrick, Jill Reedy","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2026.156891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) is a measure of diet quality that has been used in nutrition surveillance, epidemiology and health outcomes research, evaluation of interventions and policies, research on the food stream, and to advance statistical methods for dietary assessment. Although the HEI is familiar to researchers, there are opportunities to adapt it and further extend its application in participant and patient-facing communications that recommend healthy eating. The HEI Report was developed as a return-of-results feature for the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) III.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to user-test a HEI Report that provides information on how individualized intakes compare to population-level dietary guidance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional mixed-methods user-testing study involving eye-tracking and qualitative data. Two rounds of user testing were performed and the HEI Report was modified based on user feedback after each round.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>/Setting: From March 31 to October 4, 2021, twelve adult participants (six per round of user testing) completed both eye-tracking and qualitative interviews remotely nationwide.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The main outcome measures were feasibility and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses: </strong>All qualitative data were transcribed verbatim and recommended changes were categorized into high priority, low priority, and optional desired changes that would affect design but not comprehension. Eye tracking data were used to aid interpretation of qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The report's content (e.g., simplified instructions, resources page, title page, personalized phrasing) and design (e.g., graphical depictions, key, colors) were modified based on user-testing feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HEI Report was designed, usability tested, and launched in the NCI's Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) III. The HEI Report may be used to return value to participants as part of an effective participant engagement and retention plan in human research studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":"156891"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2026.156891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) is a measure of diet quality that has been used in nutrition surveillance, epidemiology and health outcomes research, evaluation of interventions and policies, research on the food stream, and to advance statistical methods for dietary assessment. Although the HEI is familiar to researchers, there are opportunities to adapt it and further extend its application in participant and patient-facing communications that recommend healthy eating. The HEI Report was developed as a return-of-results feature for the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) III.
Objective: The objective of this study was to user-test a HEI Report that provides information on how individualized intakes compare to population-level dietary guidance.
Design: This was a cross-sectional mixed-methods user-testing study involving eye-tracking and qualitative data. Two rounds of user testing were performed and the HEI Report was modified based on user feedback after each round.
Participants: /Setting: From March 31 to October 4, 2021, twelve adult participants (six per round of user testing) completed both eye-tracking and qualitative interviews remotely nationwide.
Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures were feasibility and acceptability.
Statistical analyses: All qualitative data were transcribed verbatim and recommended changes were categorized into high priority, low priority, and optional desired changes that would affect design but not comprehension. Eye tracking data were used to aid interpretation of qualitative data.
Results: The report's content (e.g., simplified instructions, resources page, title page, personalized phrasing) and design (e.g., graphical depictions, key, colors) were modified based on user-testing feedback.
Conclusions: The HEI Report was designed, usability tested, and launched in the NCI's Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) III. The HEI Report may be used to return value to participants as part of an effective participant engagement and retention plan in human research studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.