Teprotumumab for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Studies.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Aimin Sun, Xing Wang, Junyu Wang, Nan Yu, Yedi Cao, Yahui Wei, Jizhe Han, Ying Gao, Yuan Wu
{"title":"Teprotumumab for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Studies.","authors":"Aimin Sun, Xing Wang, Junyu Wang, Nan Yu, Yedi Cao, Yahui Wei, Jizhe Han, Ying Gao, Yuan Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2026.09.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Topic: </strong>Teprotumumab is the first FDA-approved biologic for moderate-to-severe thyroid eye disease (TED). Although efficacy has been established in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), real-world studies (RWS) have reported different efficacy and safety patterns, supporting an updated synthesis.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>A comprehensive assessment of teprotumumab across trials and routine clinical practice is needed to guide treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis included RCTs and RWS evaluating intravenous teprotumumab in adults with TED and reporting at least one prespecified efficacy or safety outcome. Other anti-IGF-1R RCTs were used only in supplementary class analyses. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to August 10, 2026. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and Joanna Briggs Institute criteria. Fixed- or random-effects models were selected according to heterogeneity. Risk ratios were used for dichotomous outcomes, mean differences for continuous outcomes, and proportions for single-arm RWS. Certainty was evaluated using GRADE. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251152338).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six studies (6 RCTs and 30 RWS) were included; 4 RCTs evaluated teprotumumab and 2 evaluated other anti-IGF-1R antibodies. Proptosis response favored teprotumumab in RCTs (risk ratio, 4.55; 95% confidence interval, 2.52-8.23) and was achieved by 82% of patients in RWS (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.86; 11 studies, 482 patients). Diplopia response also favored teprotumumab in RCTs (risk ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-2.98), while 60% of patients improved in RWS (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.68; 6 studies, 204 patients). Hyperglycemia was more frequent with teprotumumab in RCTs (risk ratio, 2.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-6.85) and occurred in 17% of patients in RWS (13 studies, 671 patients). Hearing impairment was also increased in RCTs (risk ratio, 4.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-10.96) and occurred in 18% of patients in RWS (13 studies, 592 patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Teprotumumab improves proptosis and diplopia across study designs, but hyperglycemia and hearing impairment in real-world practice warrant appropriate patient selection and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2026.09.034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Topic: Teprotumumab is the first FDA-approved biologic for moderate-to-severe thyroid eye disease (TED). Although efficacy has been established in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), real-world studies (RWS) have reported different efficacy and safety patterns, supporting an updated synthesis.

Clinical relevance: A comprehensive assessment of teprotumumab across trials and routine clinical practice is needed to guide treatment decisions.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included RCTs and RWS evaluating intravenous teprotumumab in adults with TED and reporting at least one prespecified efficacy or safety outcome. Other anti-IGF-1R RCTs were used only in supplementary class analyses. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to August 10, 2026. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and Joanna Briggs Institute criteria. Fixed- or random-effects models were selected according to heterogeneity. Risk ratios were used for dichotomous outcomes, mean differences for continuous outcomes, and proportions for single-arm RWS. Certainty was evaluated using GRADE. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251152338).

Results: Thirty-six studies (6 RCTs and 30 RWS) were included; 4 RCTs evaluated teprotumumab and 2 evaluated other anti-IGF-1R antibodies. Proptosis response favored teprotumumab in RCTs (risk ratio, 4.55; 95% confidence interval, 2.52-8.23) and was achieved by 82% of patients in RWS (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.86; 11 studies, 482 patients). Diplopia response also favored teprotumumab in RCTs (risk ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-2.98), while 60% of patients improved in RWS (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.68; 6 studies, 204 patients). Hyperglycemia was more frequent with teprotumumab in RCTs (risk ratio, 2.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-6.85) and occurred in 17% of patients in RWS (13 studies, 671 patients). Hearing impairment was also increased in RCTs (risk ratio, 4.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-10.96) and occurred in 18% of patients in RWS (13 studies, 592 patients).

Conclusion: Teprotumumab improves proptosis and diplopia across study designs, but hyperglycemia and hearing impairment in real-world practice warrant appropriate patient selection and monitoring.

Teprotumumab治疗甲状腺眼病:随机对照试验和现实世界研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
Teprotumumab是fda批准的首个用于治疗中度至重度甲状腺眼病(TED)的生物制剂。尽管在随机对照试验(rct)中已经建立了疗效,但实际研究(RWS)报告了不同的疗效和安全性模式,支持更新的综合。临床相关性:需要在试验和常规临床实践中对teprotumumab进行全面评估,以指导治疗决策。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析包括rct和RWS,评估静脉注射teprotumumab治疗成人TED患者,并报告至少一个预先指定的疗效或安全性结果。其他抗igf - 1r随机对照试验仅用于补充类分析。PubMed, Embase, Web of Science和Cochrane Library从成立到2026年8月10日进行了检索。两位审稿人独立筛选研究,提取数据,并使用Cochrane RoB 2工具和Joanna Briggs Institute标准评估偏倚风险。根据异质性选择固定或随机效应模型。风险比用于二分类结果,平均差异用于连续结果,比例用于单臂RWS。采用GRADE评价确定性。该协议在PROSPERO (CRD420251152338)中注册。结果:共纳入36项研究(6项rct和30项RWS);4项随机对照试验评估teprotumumab, 2项评估其他抗igf - 1r抗体。在rct中,预后反应倾向于teprotumumab(风险比,4.55;95%可信区间,2.52-8.23),在RWS中,82%的患者达到了预后反应(95%可信区间,0.78-0.86;11项研究,482例患者)。在rct中,teprotumumab的复视反应也更有利(风险比,2.13;95%可信区间,1.51-2.98),而60%的RWS患者得到改善(95%可信区间,0.51-0.68;6项研究,204例患者)。在随机对照试验中,teprotumumab组高血糖发生率更高(风险比为2.67;95%可信区间为1.04-6.85),在RWS患者中高血糖发生率为17%(13项研究,671例患者)。在随机对照试验中,听力障碍也增加(风险比4.05;95%可信区间1.50-10.96),18%的RWS患者出现听力障碍(13项研究,592例患者)。结论:Teprotumumab在研究设计中改善了预后和复视,但在现实世界的实践中,高血糖和听力障碍需要适当的患者选择和监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书