Identifying gaps in gastroenterology advanced practice provider onboarding: results from a national survey and early outcomes from a pilot inpatient training curriculum

iGIE Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-02 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2026.05.013
Catherine Brady MPAS, PA-C
{"title":"Identifying gaps in gastroenterology advanced practice provider onboarding: results from a national survey and early outcomes from a pilot inpatient training curriculum","authors":"Catherine Brady MPAS, PA-C","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2026.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Advanced practice providers (APPs) play an essential role in gastroenterology (GE), yet structured onboarding practices remain highly variable across practice settings. Limited specialty-specific training may affect provider confidence, clinical readiness, and patient care quality. This study aimed to characterize national GE APP onboarding experiences and evaluate the early outcomes of a pilot inpatient GE training curriculum designed to address identified gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 13-item national electronic survey was distributed through the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) APP listserv to assess onboarding duration, confidence in managing routine GE cases, and desired training topics. Descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test were used to analyze survey responses. On the basis of key findings, a 4-week competency-based inpatient GE curriculum was implemented at the University of Colorado (Aurora, Colorado, USA). Knowledge acquisition was measured through pretest and post-test assessments, and attending physicians evaluated APP readiness using Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–aligned competency domains.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The survey was distributed to 289 APPs via the AGA APP listserv, with 69 responses received (67 complete; 23% response rate). Before any onboarding, 46.9% reported “not at all” or “slightly confident.” After onboarding (which was &lt;3 months for &gt;80% of respondents), only 39.4% felt “very” or “extremely confident” in managing routine GE cases. In the pilot curriculum, 4 APP participants with prior outpatient GE experience improved their mean knowledge scores from 9.5 out of 13 to 12 out of 13. All participants reported increased confidence, improved team integration, and greater readiness for inpatient care. Attending evaluations reflected progression from developing competence in week 1 to meeting or exceeding expectations by week 4.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>National data demonstrate substantial variability and gaps in GE APP onboarding, underscoring the need for structured, competency-based education. The pilot inpatient curriculum significantly improved knowledge, confidence, and observed clinical readiness, suggesting that short, focused training may be an effective model to enhance APP integration and support high-quality GE care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 495-500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294970862600110X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Advanced practice providers (APPs) play an essential role in gastroenterology (GE), yet structured onboarding practices remain highly variable across practice settings. Limited specialty-specific training may affect provider confidence, clinical readiness, and patient care quality. This study aimed to characterize national GE APP onboarding experiences and evaluate the early outcomes of a pilot inpatient GE training curriculum designed to address identified gaps.

Methods

A 13-item national electronic survey was distributed through the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) APP listserv to assess onboarding duration, confidence in managing routine GE cases, and desired training topics. Descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test were used to analyze survey responses. On the basis of key findings, a 4-week competency-based inpatient GE curriculum was implemented at the University of Colorado (Aurora, Colorado, USA). Knowledge acquisition was measured through pretest and post-test assessments, and attending physicians evaluated APP readiness using Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–aligned competency domains.

Results

The survey was distributed to 289 APPs via the AGA APP listserv, with 69 responses received (67 complete; 23% response rate). Before any onboarding, 46.9% reported “not at all” or “slightly confident.” After onboarding (which was <3 months for >80% of respondents), only 39.4% felt “very” or “extremely confident” in managing routine GE cases. In the pilot curriculum, 4 APP participants with prior outpatient GE experience improved their mean knowledge scores from 9.5 out of 13 to 12 out of 13. All participants reported increased confidence, improved team integration, and greater readiness for inpatient care. Attending evaluations reflected progression from developing competence in week 1 to meeting or exceeding expectations by week 4.

Conclusions

National data demonstrate substantial variability and gaps in GE APP onboarding, underscoring the need for structured, competency-based education. The pilot inpatient curriculum significantly improved knowledge, confidence, and observed clinical readiness, suggesting that short, focused training may be an effective model to enhance APP integration and support high-quality GE care.
确定胃肠病学高级实践提供者入职的差距:来自全国调查的结果和试点住院患者培训课程的早期结果
背景和目的高级实践提供者(app)在胃肠病学(GE)中发挥着至关重要的作用,然而结构化的入职实践在实践环境中仍然高度可变。有限的专业培训可能会影响提供者的信心、临床准备和患者护理质量。本研究旨在描述国家通用电气APP入职经验,并评估试点通用电气住院培训课程的早期结果,该课程旨在解决已确定的差距。方法通过美国胃肠病学协会(AGA) APP列表服务器分发一份包含13项内容的全国电子调查,以评估入组时间、管理常规GE病例的信心以及期望的培训主题。采用描述性统计、Wilcoxon符号秩检验和McNemar检验对调查结果进行分析。基于这些主要发现,科罗拉多大学(Aurora, Colorado, USA)实施了为期四周的以能力为基础的住院GE课程。通过测试前和测试后评估来测量知识获取,主治医生使用研究生医学教育认证委员会一致的能力域来评估APP准备情况。调查通过AGA应用程序列表服务器分发给289个应用程序,收到69份回复(67份完整,回复率23%)。在入职前,46.9%的人表示“完全没有信心”或“稍微有信心”。在入职后(80%的受访者为3个月),只有39.4%的人对管理通用电气的日常案例感到“非常”或“非常有信心”。在试点课程中,4名具有门诊GE经验的APP参与者将其平均知识得分从13分中的9.5分提高到13分中的12分。所有参与者都报告信心增强,团队整合改善,住院治疗准备更充分。参加评估反映了从第一周的能力发展到第四周达到或超过预期的进展。结论:国家数据显示了GE APP入职的巨大差异和差距,强调了结构化、基于能力的教育的必要性。试点住院病人课程显著提高了知识、信心和观察到的临床准备情况,表明短期、重点培训可能是增强APP整合和支持高质量GE护理的有效模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书