Where to plug in? Assessing the users’ preferences for EV charging location

IF 5.1 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Md. Shahadat Hossain, Mahmudur Rahman Fatmi, Mostaq Ahmed, Bijoy Saha
{"title":"Where to plug in? Assessing the users’ preferences for EV charging location","authors":"Md. Shahadat Hossain,&nbsp;Mahmudur Rahman Fatmi,&nbsp;Mostaq Ahmed,&nbsp;Bijoy Saha","doi":"10.1016/j.ijtst.2025.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates individuals’ electric vehicle (EV) charging location preferences in the Okanagan region of British Columbia. Data come from the British Columbia Activity Time Use Survey (BC ATUS) conducted in 2023, which collected individuals’ ranked preferences for charging their EVs in the following location alternatives: home, work, grocery stores, shopping malls, en-route, gas stations, and other locations. A random parameter rank-ordered logit (RPROL) model is employed to capture the relative preferences for different charging locations. The results reveal that individuals’ socio-demographics, travel attributes, built-environment characteristics, and accessibility measures significantly influence EV charging location preferences. For example, higher-income individuals show higher preferences for charging at home and workplace. Residents of detached houses prefer home and workplace charging over grocery stores and shopping malls. Apartment dwellers show higher preferences for charging their vehicles in grocery stores, shopping malls, gas stations, and other locations. Additionally, individuals traveling longer distances daily are likely to have higher preferences for charging their EVs in shopping malls, en-route, and gas stations. The proximity of charging stations and land use mix also play a critical role in influencing charging location preferences. A higher number of charging stations near home is found to reduce the preferences for home charging. On the other hand, a higher land use mix around workplaces, indicating the availability of diverse amenities, reduces the preferences for workplace charging. Providing community-based charging facilities might be able to accommodate the EV charging needs of these individuals. Nevertheless, the findings of this study provide valuable insights for policymakers and planners regarding user preferences for charging, which will help in strategic investments, planning, and EV charging infrastructure development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52282,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 21-35"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2046043025000772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates individuals’ electric vehicle (EV) charging location preferences in the Okanagan region of British Columbia. Data come from the British Columbia Activity Time Use Survey (BC ATUS) conducted in 2023, which collected individuals’ ranked preferences for charging their EVs in the following location alternatives: home, work, grocery stores, shopping malls, en-route, gas stations, and other locations. A random parameter rank-ordered logit (RPROL) model is employed to capture the relative preferences for different charging locations. The results reveal that individuals’ socio-demographics, travel attributes, built-environment characteristics, and accessibility measures significantly influence EV charging location preferences. For example, higher-income individuals show higher preferences for charging at home and workplace. Residents of detached houses prefer home and workplace charging over grocery stores and shopping malls. Apartment dwellers show higher preferences for charging their vehicles in grocery stores, shopping malls, gas stations, and other locations. Additionally, individuals traveling longer distances daily are likely to have higher preferences for charging their EVs in shopping malls, en-route, and gas stations. The proximity of charging stations and land use mix also play a critical role in influencing charging location preferences. A higher number of charging stations near home is found to reduce the preferences for home charging. On the other hand, a higher land use mix around workplaces, indicating the availability of diverse amenities, reduces the preferences for workplace charging. Providing community-based charging facilities might be able to accommodate the EV charging needs of these individuals. Nevertheless, the findings of this study provide valuable insights for policymakers and planners regarding user preferences for charging, which will help in strategic investments, planning, and EV charging infrastructure development.
在哪里插入?评估用户对电动汽车充电地点的偏好
本研究调查了不列颠哥伦比亚省奥肯那根地区个人对电动汽车(EV)充电地点的偏好。数据来自2023年进行的不列颠哥伦比亚省活动时间使用调查(BC ATUS),该调查收集了个人在以下地点为电动汽车充电的偏好排名:家庭、工作、杂货店、购物中心、途中、加油站和其他地点。采用随机参数秩序logit (RPROL)模型捕捉不同充电地点的相对偏好。结果表明,个体的社会人口特征、出行属性、建筑环境特征和可达性对电动汽车充电地点偏好有显著影响。例如,高收入人群更喜欢在家里和工作场所充电。与杂货店和购物中心相比,独立式住宅的居民更喜欢在家里和工作场所充电。住公寓的人更喜欢在杂货店、购物中心、加油站和其他地方给汽车充电。此外,每天长途旅行的人可能更倾向于在购物中心、途中和加油站给电动汽车充电。充电站的邻近性和土地利用组合也在影响充电站选址偏好方面起着关键作用。研究发现,家庭附近充电站数量越多,人们对家庭充电的偏好就越低。另一方面,工作场所周围较高的土地使用组合,表明各种设施的可用性,降低了对工作场所收费的偏好。提供基于社区的充电设施可能能够满足这些个人的电动汽车充电需求。然而,本研究的发现为政策制定者和规划者提供了有关用户充电偏好的宝贵见解,这将有助于战略投资、规划和电动汽车充电基础设施的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology
International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
88 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书