Successful superior vena cava isolation using point-by-point cryothermal ablation after failed radiofrequency ablation

Q4 Medicine
Journal of Cardiology Cases Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jccase.2026.06.009
Shimpei Seiki MD, Takeshi Matsuura MD, Satoshi Yamamoto MD
{"title":"Successful superior vena cava isolation using point-by-point cryothermal ablation after failed radiofrequency ablation","authors":"Shimpei Seiki MD,&nbsp;Takeshi Matsuura MD,&nbsp;Satoshi Yamamoto MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jccase.2026.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), but non–pulmonary vein (non-PV) triggers such as the superior vena cava (SVC) also play an important role. Electrical isolation of the SVC (SVCI) can be limited by anatomical complexity and the risk of phrenic nerve or sinus node injury, particularly with radiofrequency or cryoballoon techniques. We report a 76-year-old woman with recurrent paroxysmal AF after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. During repeat ablation, AF was initially induced from the left atrial posterior wall and successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation. Subsequent provocation revealed AF triggers from the SVC. Despite careful radiofrequency ablation under phrenic nerve pacing, complete SVCI could not be achieved. Point-by-point cryothermal ablation was then performed under continuous phrenic nerve monitoring, resulting in successful SVCI without complications. This case suggests that focal cryothermal ablation may be a practical and safer alternative when SVCI cannot be achieved with radiofrequency energy.</div></div><div><h3>Learning objective</h3><div>To understand that superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) may be challenging with radiofrequency ablation due to anatomical complexity and safety limitations related to phrenic nerve injury. This case highlights point-by-point cryothermal ablation as a feasible alternative strategy, enabling stable catheter contact, precise lesion delivery, and continuous phrenic nerve monitoring, particularly in regions where point-by-point pulsed-field ablation is not yet available.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiology Cases","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 169-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiology Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878540926000708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), but non–pulmonary vein (non-PV) triggers such as the superior vena cava (SVC) also play an important role. Electrical isolation of the SVC (SVCI) can be limited by anatomical complexity and the risk of phrenic nerve or sinus node injury, particularly with radiofrequency or cryoballoon techniques. We report a 76-year-old woman with recurrent paroxysmal AF after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. During repeat ablation, AF was initially induced from the left atrial posterior wall and successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation. Subsequent provocation revealed AF triggers from the SVC. Despite careful radiofrequency ablation under phrenic nerve pacing, complete SVCI could not be achieved. Point-by-point cryothermal ablation was then performed under continuous phrenic nerve monitoring, resulting in successful SVCI without complications. This case suggests that focal cryothermal ablation may be a practical and safer alternative when SVCI cannot be achieved with radiofrequency energy.

Learning objective

To understand that superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) may be challenging with radiofrequency ablation due to anatomical complexity and safety limitations related to phrenic nerve injury. This case highlights point-by-point cryothermal ablation as a feasible alternative strategy, enabling stable catheter contact, precise lesion delivery, and continuous phrenic nerve monitoring, particularly in regions where point-by-point pulsed-field ablation is not yet available.
射频消融失败后,采用点对点低温消融成功隔离上腔静脉
肺静脉隔离是房颤(AF)导管消融的基石,但非肺静脉(non-PV)触发因素如上腔静脉(SVC)也起着重要作用。由于解剖复杂性和膈神经或窦房结损伤的风险,特别是采用射频或低温球囊技术,SVCI的电隔离可能受到限制。我们报告一位76岁女性在冷冻球囊肺静脉隔离后复发性阵发性房颤。在重复消融过程中,心房颤动最初是由左心房后壁引起的,并通过射频消融成功治疗。随后的刺激显示AF触发来自SVC。尽管在膈神经起搏下进行了仔细的射频消融,但仍不能实现完全的SVCI。然后在连续膈神经监测下进行逐点低温消融,成功完成SVCI,无并发症。本病例提示,当射频能量无法实现SVCI时,局部低温消融可能是一种实用且更安全的替代方法。学习目的了解由于膈神经损伤的解剖复杂性和安全性限制,上腔静脉隔离(SVCI)在射频消融术中可能具有挑战性。本病例强调了点对点冷冻消融作为一种可行的替代策略,可以实现稳定的导管接触、精确的病变递送和连续的膈神经监测,特别是在点对点脉冲场消融尚未可用的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiology Cases
Journal of Cardiology Cases Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书