Global Warming, Local Responses: Why Treelines Do Not Respond Uniformly to Climate Change in the French Pyrenees

IF 6.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Thierry Feuillet, Pablo Moreno-Garcia, Déborah Birre, Léa Keurinck, Johan Milian, Roberto Serrano-Notivoli, Matthieu Vignal, Maxime Cauchoix, Steve Hagimont, Olivier Theureaux, David Sheeren, Xavier Morin, Luc Barbaro
{"title":"Global Warming, Local Responses: Why Treelines Do Not Respond Uniformly to Climate Change in the French Pyrenees","authors":"Thierry Feuillet,&nbsp;Pablo Moreno-Garcia,&nbsp;Déborah Birre,&nbsp;Léa Keurinck,&nbsp;Johan Milian,&nbsp;Roberto Serrano-Notivoli,&nbsp;Matthieu Vignal,&nbsp;Maxime Cauchoix,&nbsp;Steve Hagimont,&nbsp;Olivier Theureaux,&nbsp;David Sheeren,&nbsp;Xavier Morin,&nbsp;Luc Barbaro","doi":"10.1111/geb.70311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Treeline ecotones are key indicators of environmental change, yet their responses to climate warming vary markedly across landscapes. This study investigates how elevation and local environmental contexts moderate warming effects on treeline dynamics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>French Pyrenees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>1950s to 2015.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Montane and alpine treeline ecotones are dominated, respectively, by <i>Fagus sylvatica</i> and <i>Pinus uncinata</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analysed 626 treelines using two metrics of long-term ecotone dynamics: elevational shift and forest infilling. We tested three hypotheses: (i) whether elevation moderates warming effects on treeline dynamics; (ii) whether treeline responses remain spatially heterogeneous within elevational zones; and (iii) whether local environmental factors explain this heterogeneity. Climate change was quantified as absolute maximum temperature change (Δ<i>T</i><sub>max</sub>) between 1950–1984 and 1985–2020. Sites were objectively stratified into montane treeline ecotones (MTE; &lt; 1942 m) and alpine treeline ecotones (ATE; ≥ 1942 m).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Elevation strongly moderated climate change effects, with (i) montane treelines showing larger elevational shifts but weaker relationships with warming, likely reflecting forest rebound following pastoral abandonment, while (ii) alpine treelines showed smaller shifts but stronger warming relationships, likely constrained by slow demographic processes near tree physiological limits. We also found support for spatial heterogeneity persistence within both montane and alpine belts. Local environmental factors largely explained this heterogeneity, with well-drained, steep sites exhibiting positive warming responses and poorly-drained sites and crystalline substrates showing negative or neutral responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Treeline responses to warming are context-dependent, with local environmental conditions moderating and even reversing climate effects. The spatial heterogeneity observed reconciles apparently contradictory patterns in global treeline literature by demonstrating that warming effects interact with local filters to produce heterogeneous outcomes even within elevational zones. These findings highlight the need for spatially explicit models of treeline dynamics that integrate local environmental contexts, improving our ability to monitor and conserve these sensitive ecosystems.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"35 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70311","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70311","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Treeline ecotones are key indicators of environmental change, yet their responses to climate warming vary markedly across landscapes. This study investigates how elevation and local environmental contexts moderate warming effects on treeline dynamics.

Location

French Pyrenees.

Time Period

1950s to 2015.

Major Taxa Studied

Montane and alpine treeline ecotones are dominated, respectively, by Fagus sylvatica and Pinus uncinata.

Methods

We analysed 626 treelines using two metrics of long-term ecotone dynamics: elevational shift and forest infilling. We tested three hypotheses: (i) whether elevation moderates warming effects on treeline dynamics; (ii) whether treeline responses remain spatially heterogeneous within elevational zones; and (iii) whether local environmental factors explain this heterogeneity. Climate change was quantified as absolute maximum temperature change (ΔTmax) between 1950–1984 and 1985–2020. Sites were objectively stratified into montane treeline ecotones (MTE; < 1942 m) and alpine treeline ecotones (ATE; ≥ 1942 m).

Results

Elevation strongly moderated climate change effects, with (i) montane treelines showing larger elevational shifts but weaker relationships with warming, likely reflecting forest rebound following pastoral abandonment, while (ii) alpine treelines showed smaller shifts but stronger warming relationships, likely constrained by slow demographic processes near tree physiological limits. We also found support for spatial heterogeneity persistence within both montane and alpine belts. Local environmental factors largely explained this heterogeneity, with well-drained, steep sites exhibiting positive warming responses and poorly-drained sites and crystalline substrates showing negative or neutral responses.

Main Conclusions

Treeline responses to warming are context-dependent, with local environmental conditions moderating and even reversing climate effects. The spatial heterogeneity observed reconciles apparently contradictory patterns in global treeline literature by demonstrating that warming effects interact with local filters to produce heterogeneous outcomes even within elevational zones. These findings highlight the need for spatially explicit models of treeline dynamics that integrate local environmental contexts, improving our ability to monitor and conserve these sensitive ecosystems.

全球变暖,地方反应:为什么法国比利牛斯山脉的树线对气候变化的反应不一致
目的:树线过渡带是环境变化的关键指标,但其对气候变暖的响应在不同景观之间存在显著差异。本研究探讨了海拔和当地环境背景如何调节变暖对树线动态的影响。地理位置:法国比利牛斯山脉。时间:20世纪50年代至2015年山地和高山林木线过渡带分别以森林Fagus sylvatica和松us uncinata为主。方法对626条树线进行了分析,采用了海拔变化和森林填充这两个长期交替带动态指标。我们检验了三个假设:(i)海拔是否会缓和变暖对树线动态的影响;(ii)在海拔带内,树线响应是否在空间上保持异质性;(3)当地环境因素是否解释了这种异质性。将气候变化量化为1950-1984年和1985-2020年的绝对最高温度变化(Δ T max)。客观地将样点划分为山地林线过渡带(MTE; < 1942 m)和高山林线过渡带(ATE;≥1942 m)。结果海拔高度强烈地调节了气候变化的影响,其中(1)山地树线表现出较大的海拔高度变化,但与气候变暖的关系较弱,可能反映了牧区放弃后的森林反弹;(2)高山树线表现出较小的海拔变化,但与气候变暖的关系较强,可能受到接近树木生理极限的缓慢人口统计学过程的限制。在山地带和高寒带中也发现了空间异质性的持久性。局部环境因素在很大程度上解释了这种异质性,排水良好的陡峭地区表现出积极的变暖响应,而排水不良的地区和结晶基质则表现出消极或中性的响应。树线对变暖的响应依赖于环境,局部环境条件会减缓甚至逆转气候效应。观测到的空间异质性调和了全球树线文献中明显矛盾的模式,表明增温效应与局部过滤器相互作用,即使在海拔带内也会产生异质性结果。这些发现强调需要空间明确的树线动态模型,以整合当地环境背景,提高我们监测和保护这些敏感生态系统的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书