PS8-7. Swathgrazing Polycrops to Build Cow-Calf Resilience and Profitability in Alberta.

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Mary-Juliet N Uwakwe, Janet Nowosad, Carien Vandenberg, Erick Santos, Obioha N Durunna
{"title":"PS8-7. Swathgrazing Polycrops to Build Cow-Calf Resilience and Profitability in Alberta.","authors":"Mary-Juliet N Uwakwe, Janet Nowosad, Carien Vandenberg, Erick Santos, Obioha N Durunna","doi":"10.1093/jas/skag272.565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cow-calf industry in Alberta accounts for over 40% of Canada’s beef breeding stock; therefore, evaluating factors that improve the sustainability and profitability of the cow-calf sector will positively impact Canada’s economy. Swathgrazing is a management practice in which annual forage crops are cut and left in windrows for livestock to graze during the fall or winter. This study assessed animal performance, mineral supplement intake, and carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions from cow-calf pairs. The study was laid out in a randomized complete block design with two treatments and three replicates (6 paddocks in total measuring 12-ha (213.4 x 625 m)). Treatments were either a monocrop system of CDC-SO1 oats (Avena sativa L.) or a polycrop forage system (oats, forage peas (Pisum sativum L.), turnips (Brassica rapa L.), and rape (Brassica napus L.)). Eighteen cow-calf pairs were stratified by body weight, and three pairs were allocated to each paddock of 2-ha and dimensions of 35.6 x 625 m. Animals grazed for 72 days and had ad libitum access to an automatic feeding unit to collect individual mineral intake. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were tracked using a Greenfeed Emissions Monitoring System. Animals were weighed at the start (SOT) and end (EOT) of the trial, and every 21 days during the trial. Backfat ultrasound scans were collected at SOT (day 0) and EOT (day 72) of the trial. Statistical analyses of animal performance, mineral intake, and CO2 and CH4 emissions data were performed using PROC MIXED in SAS. Fixed effects included treatments (oats and polycrops), animal class (calves and cows), and their interaction, with paddock as a random effect in the analyses of mineral intake and GHG emissions. There was a Treatment × Class interaction (P = 0.02) for average daily gain (ADG). The calves gained 0.89 kg/day under the oats monocrop system and 0.92 kg/day under the polycrop system. In contrast, the cows gained 0.33 kg/day under the oats monocrop system and lost 0.09 kg/day under the polycrop system. Pairwise comparisons showed that oats significantly improved ADG in cows compared with polycrop (P = 0.003), whereas no significant difference between treatments was observed in calves (P = 0.83). Mineral intake was influenced by animal class (P = 0.01), with cows consuming more than calves. The GHG emissions were also affected by animal class (P < 0.01). Cows produced more CO2 and CH4 than calves in both treatments. The results showed that calves’ ADG increased regardless of the treatment, and the cows benefited more from oats. There was no difference in GHG emissions between the treatments.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cow-calf industry in Alberta accounts for over 40% of Canada’s beef breeding stock; therefore, evaluating factors that improve the sustainability and profitability of the cow-calf sector will positively impact Canada’s economy. Swathgrazing is a management practice in which annual forage crops are cut and left in windrows for livestock to graze during the fall or winter. This study assessed animal performance, mineral supplement intake, and carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions from cow-calf pairs. The study was laid out in a randomized complete block design with two treatments and three replicates (6 paddocks in total measuring 12-ha (213.4 x 625 m)). Treatments were either a monocrop system of CDC-SO1 oats (Avena sativa L.) or a polycrop forage system (oats, forage peas (Pisum sativum L.), turnips (Brassica rapa L.), and rape (Brassica napus L.)). Eighteen cow-calf pairs were stratified by body weight, and three pairs were allocated to each paddock of 2-ha and dimensions of 35.6 x 625 m. Animals grazed for 72 days and had ad libitum access to an automatic feeding unit to collect individual mineral intake. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were tracked using a Greenfeed Emissions Monitoring System. Animals were weighed at the start (SOT) and end (EOT) of the trial, and every 21 days during the trial. Backfat ultrasound scans were collected at SOT (day 0) and EOT (day 72) of the trial. Statistical analyses of animal performance, mineral intake, and CO2 and CH4 emissions data were performed using PROC MIXED in SAS. Fixed effects included treatments (oats and polycrops), animal class (calves and cows), and their interaction, with paddock as a random effect in the analyses of mineral intake and GHG emissions. There was a Treatment × Class interaction (P = 0.02) for average daily gain (ADG). The calves gained 0.89 kg/day under the oats monocrop system and 0.92 kg/day under the polycrop system. In contrast, the cows gained 0.33 kg/day under the oats monocrop system and lost 0.09 kg/day under the polycrop system. Pairwise comparisons showed that oats significantly improved ADG in cows compared with polycrop (P = 0.003), whereas no significant difference between treatments was observed in calves (P = 0.83). Mineral intake was influenced by animal class (P = 0.01), with cows consuming more than calves. The GHG emissions were also affected by animal class (P < 0.01). Cows produced more CO2 and CH4 than calves in both treatments. The results showed that calves’ ADG increased regardless of the treatment, and the cows benefited more from oats. There was no difference in GHG emissions between the treatments.
PS8-7。在艾伯塔省,放牧复合作物以提高奶牛的适应力和盈利能力。
阿尔伯塔省的小牛养殖业占加拿大牛肉种畜的40%以上;因此,评估提高奶牛行业可持续性和盈利能力的因素将对加拿大经济产生积极影响。大面积放牧是一种管理方法,将一年生的饲料作物割下,放在窗户里,让牲畜在秋季或冬季吃草。本研究评估了牛-小牛对动物生产性能、矿物质补充剂摄入量和二氧化碳(CO2)和甲烷(CH4)排放。研究采用随机完全区组设计,2个处理,3个重复(6个围场,总面积12 ha (213.4 x 625 m))。处理为单作物系统(燕麦)或多作物饲料系统(燕麦,饲料豌豆(Pisum sativum L.),萝卜(Brassica rapa L.)和油菜(Brassica napus L.))。按体重对18对犊牛进行分层,每个围场面积为2 ha,面积为35.6 x 625 m,分配3对。这些动物吃了72天的草,并可以自由地进入一个自动喂食装置来收集个体的矿物质摄入量。使用绿色饲料排放监测系统跟踪温室气体(GHG)排放。试验开始(SOT)和结束(EOT)称重,试验期间每21 d称重一次。在试验的SOT(第0天)和EOT(第72天)收集背部脂肪超声扫描。使用SAS中的PROC mix对动物生产性能、矿物质摄入量以及CO2和CH4排放数据进行统计分析。固定效应包括处理(燕麦和杂交种)、动物类别(小牛和奶牛)及其相互作用,围场作为矿物质摄入和温室气体排放分析中的随机效应。平均日增重(ADG)与处理间存在交互作用(P = 0.02)。单作制度下犊牛增重0.89 kg/d,复合制度下犊牛增重0.92 kg/d。相比之下,燕麦单作制度下的奶牛增重0.33 kg/d,复合制度下的奶牛减重0.09 kg/d。两两比较表明,燕麦与杂粮相比显著提高了奶牛的平均日增重(P = 0.003),而犊牛的平均日增重在不同处理之间无显著差异(P = 0.83)。矿质摄取量受动物类别的影响(P = 0.01),奶牛摄取量大于小牛。温室气体排放也受动物类别的影响(P < 0.01)。在两种处理下,奶牛产生的CO2和CH4都比小牛多。结果表明:犊牛的平均日增重在不同处理条件下均有提高,且燕麦对犊牛的益处更大。不同处理之间的温室气体排放量没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书