PS11-16. Maternal Bovine Appeasing Substance Administration at Castration Reduces Stress, Pain-related Behavior, and Respiratory Disease in Feedlot Bulls.

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Guilherme F Monteiro, Reinaldo F Cooke, Martin Zinicola
{"title":"PS11-16. Maternal Bovine Appeasing Substance Administration at Castration Reduces Stress, Pain-related Behavior, and Respiratory Disease in Feedlot Bulls.","authors":"Guilherme F Monteiro, Reinaldo F Cooke, Martin Zinicola","doi":"10.1093/jas/skag272.436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This experiment evaluated behavioral, physiological, and health responses of feedlot-adapted bulls administered the maternal bovine appeasing substance (mBAS; Ferappease®, FERA Diagnostics and Biologicals; College Station, TX) at the time of castration. Angus-influenced (n = 182; 239 ± 3 kg) bulls were purchased from 3 sources with no previous health and management history, and transported to the research center on d -40. Bulls were assigned to initial processing and revaccination on d -36 and -12, respectively. Bulls were ranked by body weight (BW) recorded on d -12, source, and assigned to 1 of 26 pens (n = 7 bulls/pen, 13 pens/treatment) on d 0. Pens were assigned to receive bulls administered 10-mL of mBAS or no treatment (CON) immediately prior band-castration (d 0). The mBAS was applied topically to the nuchal skin area (5 mL) and above the muzzle (5 mL), and reapplied to respective steers on d 14. Final BW was recorded on d 42, whereas feed intake and signs of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) were recorded daily. Hair samples from the tail-switch were collected on d 0 and 14. Subjective pain-related behaviors were evaluated daily from d 0 to 13 using 3-point scoring system (0 = no pain, 1 = moderate pain, 2 = severe pain). Bulls were also fitted with an ear tag (CowManager®, Agis Automatisering BV, Harmelen, The Netherlands) to record behavioral responses. No treatment effects were detected (P ≥ 0.41) for BW gain, feed intake, and gain:feed, whereas mBAS cattle tended to have greater (P = 0.08) final BW. Hair cortisol concentrations did not differ (P = 0.66) between treatments on d 0, but were less (P = 0.02) in mBAS cattle on d 14 (treatment × day; P = 0.04). Incidence of BRD signs and mean pain score were less (P ≤ 0.05) for mBAS cattle. Cattle administered mBAS spent less time (P ≤ 0.03) being not active on wks 1 to 4, spent more time (P ≤ 0.03) being highly active during wks 1 and 2, and spent more time (P = 0.03) ruminating on wk 3 (treatment × day; P ≤ 0.04). Liveweight gain from d 0 to 42 tended (P = 0.09) to be greater for mBAS pens, and final liveweight was greater (P = 0.05) in mBAS pens. Pens that received mBAS had greater (P = 0.05) final value and tended (P = 0.08) to have greater profit. Administering mBAS to feedlot-adapted bulls at the time of castration attenuated chronic stress, reduced behavioral expression of pain, decreased the incidence of BRD signs, and improved pen-based productivity during a 42-d post-procedural period.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This experiment evaluated behavioral, physiological, and health responses of feedlot-adapted bulls administered the maternal bovine appeasing substance (mBAS; Ferappease®, FERA Diagnostics and Biologicals; College Station, TX) at the time of castration. Angus-influenced (n = 182; 239 ± 3 kg) bulls were purchased from 3 sources with no previous health and management history, and transported to the research center on d -40. Bulls were assigned to initial processing and revaccination on d -36 and -12, respectively. Bulls were ranked by body weight (BW) recorded on d -12, source, and assigned to 1 of 26 pens (n = 7 bulls/pen, 13 pens/treatment) on d 0. Pens were assigned to receive bulls administered 10-mL of mBAS or no treatment (CON) immediately prior band-castration (d 0). The mBAS was applied topically to the nuchal skin area (5 mL) and above the muzzle (5 mL), and reapplied to respective steers on d 14. Final BW was recorded on d 42, whereas feed intake and signs of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) were recorded daily. Hair samples from the tail-switch were collected on d 0 and 14. Subjective pain-related behaviors were evaluated daily from d 0 to 13 using 3-point scoring system (0 = no pain, 1 = moderate pain, 2 = severe pain). Bulls were also fitted with an ear tag (CowManager®, Agis Automatisering BV, Harmelen, The Netherlands) to record behavioral responses. No treatment effects were detected (P ≥ 0.41) for BW gain, feed intake, and gain:feed, whereas mBAS cattle tended to have greater (P = 0.08) final BW. Hair cortisol concentrations did not differ (P = 0.66) between treatments on d 0, but were less (P = 0.02) in mBAS cattle on d 14 (treatment × day; P = 0.04). Incidence of BRD signs and mean pain score were less (P ≤ 0.05) for mBAS cattle. Cattle administered mBAS spent less time (P ≤ 0.03) being not active on wks 1 to 4, spent more time (P ≤ 0.03) being highly active during wks 1 and 2, and spent more time (P = 0.03) ruminating on wk 3 (treatment × day; P ≤ 0.04). Liveweight gain from d 0 to 42 tended (P = 0.09) to be greater for mBAS pens, and final liveweight was greater (P = 0.05) in mBAS pens. Pens that received mBAS had greater (P = 0.05) final value and tended (P = 0.08) to have greater profit. Administering mBAS to feedlot-adapted bulls at the time of castration attenuated chronic stress, reduced behavioral expression of pain, decreased the incidence of BRD signs, and improved pen-based productivity during a 42-d post-procedural period.
PS11-16。阉割时母牛安抚物质的使用减少了饲养场公牛的压力、疼痛相关行为和呼吸系统疾病。
本实验评估了在阉割时饲喂母牛安抚物质(mBAS; fer安抚®,FERA Diagnostics and biicals; College Station, TX)的饲料场适应公牛的行为、生理和健康反应。安格斯影响公牛(n = 182; 239±3 kg)从3个没有健康和管理史的来源购买,于d -40运至研究中心。公牛分别在第36天和第12天进行初次加工和重新接种。根据第12天记录的公牛体重(BW)进行排名,并在第0天分配到26个猪圈中的1个(n = 7头牛/猪圈,13个猪圈/处理)。在带式阉割(d 0)之前,公牛被分配给10毫升的mBAS或不治疗(CON)。mBAS局部应用于颈部皮肤区域(5ml)和口鼻上方(5ml),并在第14天重新应用于各自的转向。在第42天记录最终体重,每天记录采食量和牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)症状。在第0天和第14天采集尾开关的毛发样本。从第0天到第13天,每天用3分制评估主观疼痛相关行为(0 =无疼痛,1 =中度疼痛,2 =重度疼痛)。公牛还配备了耳标(CowManager®,Agis Automatisering BV, Harmelen,荷兰)来记录行为反应。对体重增重、采食量和增重比均无显著影响(P≥0.41),而mBAS牛的最终体重往往更高(P = 0.08)。第0天各组间毛发皮质醇浓度差异无统计学意义(P = 0.66),但第14天(处理× d, P = 0.04) mBAS牛毛发皮质醇浓度差异显著(P = 0.02)。mBAS牛的BRD症状发生率和平均疼痛评分较低(P≤0.05)。饲喂mBAS的牛在第1 ~ 4周不活跃的时间较少(P≤0.03),在第1、2周活跃的时间较多(P≤0.03),在第3周反刍的时间较多(P = 0.03)(处理× d, P≤0.04)。第0 ~ 42天,mBAS栏的活重增重有较大的趋势(P = 0.09),最终活重有较大的趋势(P = 0.05)。接受mBAS的笔具有更高的最终价值(P = 0.05),并倾向于获得更高的利润(P = 0.08)。在阉割时给适应了饲养场的公牛施用mBAS可以减轻慢性应激,减少疼痛的行为表达,降低BRD症状的发生率,并在术后42天内提高围栏生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书