ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: MATHEMATICAL MODELING IN ANIMAL NUTRITION: Model Transfer and Application in Livestock Production Systems

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Hector M Menendez, Jordan Adams, Karun Kaniyamattam, Luis O Tedeschi
{"title":"ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: MATHEMATICAL MODELING IN ANIMAL NUTRITION: Model Transfer and Application in Livestock Production Systems","authors":"Hector M Menendez, Jordan Adams, Karun Kaniyamattam, Luis O Tedeschi","doi":"10.1093/jas/skag308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mathematical models have long supported nutrition management in livestock systems, progressing from early National Research Council empirical tables to complex mechanistic frameworks such as the Ruminant Nutrition System. What is less documented is how models are operationalized in commercial practice, particularly as data streams from precision livestock technologies, remote sensing, and other Internet of Things technologies are increasingly hybridized into existing modeling frameworks. A prevailing assumption is that greater sensing, automation, or algorithmic complexity will naturally translate into better decisions; however, adoption and impact in commercial systems remain uneven. To examine how models are actually used under real-world constraints, we conducted a literature review and semi-structured interviews (n = 11) with livestock producers, technology developers, consultants, and value-chain actors working at the interface of biology, data, models, and farm decision-making. Six cross-cutting themes emerged: 1) model augmentation of systems, 2) model predictive control (MPC), 3) human centered adoption, 4) technology fit, 5) data bottlenecks, and 6) data enlightened value chain (Figure 1). Collectively, these insights re-center nutrition as the integrating discipline for productivity, welfare, and sustainability, and emphasize MPC and open, interoperable data pipelines as prerequisites for moving beyond pilots toward durable adoption. Interviewees consistently emphasized that meaningful impact depends on aligning biological realism, software engineering, and value-chain incentives so that models support actionable decisions under commercial constraints, rather than pursuing automation for its own sake.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mathematical models have long supported nutrition management in livestock systems, progressing from early National Research Council empirical tables to complex mechanistic frameworks such as the Ruminant Nutrition System. What is less documented is how models are operationalized in commercial practice, particularly as data streams from precision livestock technologies, remote sensing, and other Internet of Things technologies are increasingly hybridized into existing modeling frameworks. A prevailing assumption is that greater sensing, automation, or algorithmic complexity will naturally translate into better decisions; however, adoption and impact in commercial systems remain uneven. To examine how models are actually used under real-world constraints, we conducted a literature review and semi-structured interviews (n = 11) with livestock producers, technology developers, consultants, and value-chain actors working at the interface of biology, data, models, and farm decision-making. Six cross-cutting themes emerged: 1) model augmentation of systems, 2) model predictive control (MPC), 3) human centered adoption, 4) technology fit, 5) data bottlenecks, and 6) data enlightened value chain (Figure 1). Collectively, these insights re-center nutrition as the integrating discipline for productivity, welfare, and sustainability, and emphasize MPC and open, interoperable data pipelines as prerequisites for moving beyond pilots toward durable adoption. Interviewees consistently emphasized that meaningful impact depends on aligning biological realism, software engineering, and value-chain incentives so that models support actionable decisions under commercial constraints, rather than pursuing automation for its own sake.
ASAS-NANP专题讨论会:动物营养中的数学建模:模型转移和在畜牧生产系统中的应用
数学模型长期以来一直支持牲畜系统的营养管理,从早期的国家研究委员会经验表发展到复杂的机制框架,如反刍动物营养系统。较少记录的是模型在商业实践中的操作方式,特别是来自精密畜牧技术、遥感和其他物联网技术的数据流越来越多地混合到现有的建模框架中。一个普遍的假设是,更大的传感、自动化或算法复杂性自然会转化为更好的决策;然而,在商业系统中的采用和影响仍然不均衡。为了检验模型在现实世界约束下的实际使用情况,我们对畜牧业生产者、技术开发人员、顾问和从事生物学、数据、模型和农场决策工作的价值链参与者进行了文献综述和半结构化访谈(n = 11)。出现了六个交叉主题:1)系统的模型增强,2)模型预测控制(MPC), 3)以人为本的采用,4)技术适配,5)数据瓶颈,6)数据启蒙价值链(图1)。总的来说,这些见解将营养学重新定位为生产力、福利和可持续性的综合学科,并强调MPC和开放、可互操作的数据管道是从试点转向持久采用的先决条件。受访者一致强调,有意义的影响取决于生物现实主义、软件工程和价值链激励的一致性,这样模型就可以在商业约束下支持可操作的决策,而不是为了自身的利益而追求自动化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书