PS9-23. Pregnancy Losses Associated with Hormonal Factors in Beef Cows: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
German Sanabria, Eduarda R Anhaia, Giovana S Giacomelli, Julio Otavio Barcellos
{"title":"PS9-23. Pregnancy Losses Associated with Hormonal Factors in Beef Cows: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"German Sanabria, Eduarda R Anhaia, Giovana S Giacomelli, Julio Otavio Barcellos","doi":"10.1093/jas/skag272.567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gestational losses represent a major challenge for cow–calf production systems because they compromise reproductive efficiency and cause economic losses to the livestock industry. Most of these losses occur during the embryonic or early fetal period and therefore represent reproductive failures that are often difficult to detect. In this context, due to the limited number of studies relating gestational losses to hormonal alterations in beef cows, the objective of this study was to compile and quantitatively analyze, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the available data associating these factors at different stages of bovine gestation. Additionally, hormonal activity was evaluated among different categories and subspecies of beef females to identify groups with a greater predisposition to hormonal dysfunctions associated with pregnancy loss. More than 1,000 articles were identified in the Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases and screened according to the PRISMA protocol. The inclusion criteria were: i) beef cows or heifers; ii) early pregnancy diagnosis by ultrasonography between d 28 and 32; iii) studies reporting the day or range of pregnancy diagnosis, subspecies, country, parity, and reproductive method; and iv) the presence of hormonal data, including progesterone, estradiol, GnRH, eCG, PGF2α, or pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) biomarkers. Of the identified articles, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria, totaling data from 48,643 beef females. The meta-analysis followed the methodology described by Borenstein, and statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 14.0 (StataCorp, Texas, USA). A nonparametric formula was used to estimate variance because most studies did not report standard errors or standard deviations. Among the 48,643 females evaluated, 20% experienced pregnancy loss (95% CI: 0.14–0.26), with high heterogeneity among studies (I² = 99%). Among the insemination protocols evaluated, those combining GnRH and progesterone showed lower pregnancy loss (approximately 17%; 95% CI: 0.03–0.31), whereas protocols based on progesterone and estradiol, with or without eCG, showed higher losses of approximately 23% (95% CI: 0.08–0.37) and 24% (95% CI: 0.16–0.33), respectively. The stage of pregnancy loss significantly affected the results (P = 0.004), with early embryonic losses being more frequent (30%; 95% CI: 0.18–0.42) than late embryonic and early fetal losses (11%; 95% CI: 0.01–0.20). Overall, the results of this meta-analysis indicate that gestational losses associated with hormonal factors in beef cattle vary widely among studies and production systems, and even when similar hormonal protocols are used, differences are still observed. In general, the average estimated loss was approximately 20%, and no clear statistical effect of the hormonal protocol type was identified, although numerical differences were observed among groups. Moreover, losses were greater during the early embryonic stage compared with later stages of gestation, indicating that early pregnancy remains the most critical period for pregnancy maintenance in beef cows.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gestational losses represent a major challenge for cow–calf production systems because they compromise reproductive efficiency and cause economic losses to the livestock industry. Most of these losses occur during the embryonic or early fetal period and therefore represent reproductive failures that are often difficult to detect. In this context, due to the limited number of studies relating gestational losses to hormonal alterations in beef cows, the objective of this study was to compile and quantitatively analyze, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the available data associating these factors at different stages of bovine gestation. Additionally, hormonal activity was evaluated among different categories and subspecies of beef females to identify groups with a greater predisposition to hormonal dysfunctions associated with pregnancy loss. More than 1,000 articles were identified in the Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases and screened according to the PRISMA protocol. The inclusion criteria were: i) beef cows or heifers; ii) early pregnancy diagnosis by ultrasonography between d 28 and 32; iii) studies reporting the day or range of pregnancy diagnosis, subspecies, country, parity, and reproductive method; and iv) the presence of hormonal data, including progesterone, estradiol, GnRH, eCG, PGF2α, or pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (PAG) biomarkers. Of the identified articles, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria, totaling data from 48,643 beef females. The meta-analysis followed the methodology described by Borenstein, and statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 14.0 (StataCorp, Texas, USA). A nonparametric formula was used to estimate variance because most studies did not report standard errors or standard deviations. Among the 48,643 females evaluated, 20% experienced pregnancy loss (95% CI: 0.14–0.26), with high heterogeneity among studies (I² = 99%). Among the insemination protocols evaluated, those combining GnRH and progesterone showed lower pregnancy loss (approximately 17%; 95% CI: 0.03–0.31), whereas protocols based on progesterone and estradiol, with or without eCG, showed higher losses of approximately 23% (95% CI: 0.08–0.37) and 24% (95% CI: 0.16–0.33), respectively. The stage of pregnancy loss significantly affected the results (P = 0.004), with early embryonic losses being more frequent (30%; 95% CI: 0.18–0.42) than late embryonic and early fetal losses (11%; 95% CI: 0.01–0.20). Overall, the results of this meta-analysis indicate that gestational losses associated with hormonal factors in beef cattle vary widely among studies and production systems, and even when similar hormonal protocols are used, differences are still observed. In general, the average estimated loss was approximately 20%, and no clear statistical effect of the hormonal protocol type was identified, although numerical differences were observed among groups. Moreover, losses were greater during the early embryonic stage compared with later stages of gestation, indicating that early pregnancy remains the most critical period for pregnancy maintenance in beef cows.
PS9-23。与肉牛激素因素相关的妊娠损失:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
妊娠期损失是犊牛生产系统面临的主要挑战,因为它们损害了繁殖效率并给畜牧业造成经济损失。这些损失大多发生在胚胎期或早期胎儿期,因此往往是难以发现的生殖失败。在此背景下,由于有关肉牛妊娠损失与激素改变的研究数量有限,本研究的目的是通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,对牛妊娠不同阶段这些因素相关的现有数据进行汇编和定量分析。此外,对不同种类和亚种的雌性牛肉的激素活性进行了评估,以确定更容易发生与妊娠丢失相关的激素功能障碍的群体。在Scopus、Web of Science和PubMed数据库中确定了1000多篇文章,并根据PRISMA协议进行了筛选。纳入标准为:1)肉牛或小母牛;Ii)妊娠28 ~ 32岁早期超声诊断;Iii)报告妊娠诊断的日期或范围、亚种、国家、胎次和生殖方法的研究;iv)激素数据的存在,包括黄体酮、雌二醇、GnRH、eCG、PGF2α或妊娠相关糖蛋白(PAG)生物标志物。在确定的文章中,有30项研究符合纳入标准,总计来自48,643名牛肉女性的数据。meta分析采用Borenstein描述的方法,使用Stata version 14.0 (StataCorp, Texas, USA)进行统计分析。由于大多数研究没有报告标准误差或标准差,因此使用非参数公式来估计方差。在48643名接受评估的女性中,20%的人经历了妊娠失败(95% CI: 0.14-0.26),研究之间存在高度异质性(I²= 99%)。在评估的人工授精方案中,结合GnRH和孕酮的方案显示较低的妊娠损失(约17%;95% CI: 0.03-0.31),而基于孕酮和雌二醇的方案,有或没有心电图,分别显示约23% (95% CI: 0.08-0.37)和24% (95% CI: 0.16-0.33)。妊娠期丢失对结果有显著影响(P = 0.004),早期胚胎丢失(30%,95% CI: 0.18-0.42)比晚期胚胎和早期胎儿丢失(11%,95% CI: 0.01-0.20)更为频繁。总体而言,本荟萃分析的结果表明,在不同的研究和生产系统中,与肉牛激素因素相关的妊娠损失差异很大,即使使用类似的激素方案,仍然可以观察到差异。总的来说,平均估计损失约为20%,尽管在组间观察到数值差异,但没有确定激素方案类型的明确统计效应。此外,与妊娠后期相比,胚胎早期的损失更大,这表明妊娠早期仍然是肉牛维持妊娠最关键的时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书