PS12-14. Evaluation of Infrared Thermography to Assess Body Temperature in Beef Heifers of Different Breeds and Residual Feed Intake Phenotypes During Winter.

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Londono-Mendez Camila Maria Camila, Sergio Lasso Ramirez, Arturo Macias Franco, Weiguang Hao, Carolyn J Fitzsimmons, Gleise Medeiros Da Silva
{"title":"PS12-14. Evaluation of Infrared Thermography to Assess Body Temperature in Beef Heifers of Different Breeds and Residual Feed Intake Phenotypes During Winter.","authors":"Londono-Mendez Camila Maria Camila, Sergio Lasso Ramirez, Arturo Macias Franco, Weiguang Hao, Carolyn J Fitzsimmons, Gleise Medeiros Da Silva","doi":"10.1093/jas/skag272.439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated infrared thermography to assess body temperature in beef heifers with divergent residual feed intake (RFI) during winter. Ninety-eight beef heifers (Angus [AN], Charolais [CH], Kinsella Composite [KC], and Hays Converter [HC]; 235 ± 18.1, 225 ± 18.2, 246 ± 19.5, and 228 ± 17.5 kg body weight, respectively; 8 ± 1 mo of age) were managed in a drylot for 86 d, and fat-corrected RFI was calculated. Heifers were classified as more (LOW-RFI = −0.43 ± 0.308, −0.36 ± 0.307, −0.48 ± 0.386, and −0.54 ± 0.356 kg DM/d; n = 13, 15, 14, and 12 for AN, CH, KC, and HC, respectively) or less efficient (HIGH-RFI = 0.43 ± 0.254, 0.67 ± 0.218, 0.56 ± 0.385, and 0.59 ± 0.348 kg DM/d; n = 13, 8, 12, and 11, respectively). Weather was recorded daily, and infrared images of the frontal bone, eye, nasal bone, snout, cheek, flank, and ventral tail were collected every 17 ± 6 d using FLIR E8 PRO and analyzed using a linear mixed model with RFI, day, and interaction as fixed effects and animal as a random effect (SAS 9.4). Mean air temperature was -23, -11, -12, 3, -27, and 6 °C on d 0, 16, 30, 44, 58, and 85, respectively. Eye temperatures were greater in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI KC but lower in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI CH (P < 0.01). Snout temperatures were lower in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI KC (P = 0.009), but greater in nasal bone in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI AN (P = 0.03). Tendencies indicated lower snout, ventral tail, and nasal bone temperatures in LOW-RFI AN and CH vs. HIGH-RFI (P < 0.09). Day affected all body regions across breeds (P < 0.01). RFI × day interactions indicated that thermal responses varied with environmental conditions: a higher cheek temperature was found in HIGH-RFI AN at warmest sampling but was lower at coldest (P = 0.02); flank temperature was higher in LOW-RFI than HIGH-RFI CH at − 23 °C (P = 0.03), and eye temperature was higher in LOW-RFI than HIGH-RFI KC at − 12 and −27 °C (P < 0.001). Frontal bone temperature was higher in LOW- vs HIGH-RFI KC at 3 and 6 °C (P = 0.02), while nasal bone increased with warmer air (6 vs. -27 °C) in LOW-RFI HC (P < 0.001). A tendency for a RFI × day interaction was observed in HC for frontal bone and cheek, with higher temperatures in LOW- than HIGH-RFI at 3 and −12 °C (P < 0.09). Infrared thermography detected RFI-related temperature differences across breeds and winter conditions. However, thermal responses varied by region and breed, limiting standalone reliability. Thermography may support feed efficiency classification but requires further validation.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated infrared thermography to assess body temperature in beef heifers with divergent residual feed intake (RFI) during winter. Ninety-eight beef heifers (Angus [AN], Charolais [CH], Kinsella Composite [KC], and Hays Converter [HC]; 235 ± 18.1, 225 ± 18.2, 246 ± 19.5, and 228 ± 17.5 kg body weight, respectively; 8 ± 1 mo of age) were managed in a drylot for 86 d, and fat-corrected RFI was calculated. Heifers were classified as more (LOW-RFI = −0.43 ± 0.308, −0.36 ± 0.307, −0.48 ± 0.386, and −0.54 ± 0.356 kg DM/d; n = 13, 15, 14, and 12 for AN, CH, KC, and HC, respectively) or less efficient (HIGH-RFI = 0.43 ± 0.254, 0.67 ± 0.218, 0.56 ± 0.385, and 0.59 ± 0.348 kg DM/d; n = 13, 8, 12, and 11, respectively). Weather was recorded daily, and infrared images of the frontal bone, eye, nasal bone, snout, cheek, flank, and ventral tail were collected every 17 ± 6 d using FLIR E8 PRO and analyzed using a linear mixed model with RFI, day, and interaction as fixed effects and animal as a random effect (SAS 9.4). Mean air temperature was -23, -11, -12, 3, -27, and 6 °C on d 0, 16, 30, 44, 58, and 85, respectively. Eye temperatures were greater in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI KC but lower in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI CH (P < 0.01). Snout temperatures were lower in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI KC (P = 0.009), but greater in nasal bone in LOW- vs. HIGH-RFI AN (P = 0.03). Tendencies indicated lower snout, ventral tail, and nasal bone temperatures in LOW-RFI AN and CH vs. HIGH-RFI (P < 0.09). Day affected all body regions across breeds (P < 0.01). RFI × day interactions indicated that thermal responses varied with environmental conditions: a higher cheek temperature was found in HIGH-RFI AN at warmest sampling but was lower at coldest (P = 0.02); flank temperature was higher in LOW-RFI than HIGH-RFI CH at − 23 °C (P = 0.03), and eye temperature was higher in LOW-RFI than HIGH-RFI KC at − 12 and −27 °C (P < 0.001). Frontal bone temperature was higher in LOW- vs HIGH-RFI KC at 3 and 6 °C (P = 0.02), while nasal bone increased with warmer air (6 vs. -27 °C) in LOW-RFI HC (P < 0.001). A tendency for a RFI × day interaction was observed in HC for frontal bone and cheek, with higher temperatures in LOW- than HIGH-RFI at 3 and −12 °C (P < 0.09). Infrared thermography detected RFI-related temperature differences across breeds and winter conditions. However, thermal responses varied by region and breed, limiting standalone reliability. Thermography may support feed efficiency classification but requires further validation.
PS12-14。红外热像仪对不同品种肉用小母牛冬季体温及残采食量表型的评价
本研究利用红外热像仪对不同剩余采食量(RFI)的肉牛冬季体温进行评估。选取体重分别为235±18.1、225±18.2、246±19.5和228±17.5 kg、8±1月龄的安格斯(Angus)、夏洛莱(Charolais)、金塞拉(Kinsella Composite)和海斯转炉(Hays Converter)的98头肉牛,在干地饲养86 d,计算脂肪校正RFI。小母牛被划分为高(低rfi = - 0.43±0.308,- 0.36±0.307,- 0.48±0.386和- 0.54±0.356 kg DM/d; n = 13, 15, 14和12,分别为AN, CH, KC和HC)或低(高rfi = 0.43±0.254,0.67±0.218,0.56±0.385和0.59±0.348 kg DM/d; n = 13, 8, 12和11)。每天记录天气,使用FLIR E8 PRO每17±6 d采集一次额骨、眼、鼻骨、口鼻、颊、侧腹和腹尾的红外图像,采用RFI、天和相互作用为固定效应,动物为随机效应的线性混合模型进行分析(SAS 9.4)。0、16、30、44、58和85天的平均气温分别为-23、-11、-12、3、-27和6°C。与高rfi相比,低rfi KC的眼温更高,但与高rfi CH相比,低rfi KC的眼温更低(P < 0.01)。低rfi KC组鼻部温度较低(P = 0.009),但低rfi KC组鼻骨温度高于高rfi KC组(P = 0.03)。与高rfi相比,低rfi AN和CH的鼻部、尾部腹侧和鼻骨温度较低(P < 0.09)。白天影响了不同品种的所有身体部位(P < 0.01)。RFI ×日相互作用表明,热响应随环境条件的变化而变化:高RFI AN在最热采样时脸颊温度较高,而在最冷采样时脸颊温度较低(P = 0.02);在- 23°C时,低rfi患者的侧腹温度高于高rfi患者(P = 0.03),在- 12°C和- 27°C时,低rfi患者的眼温高于高rfi患者(P < 0.001)。在低rfi KC中,额骨温度在3°C和6°C时高于高rfi KC (P = 0.02),而在低rfi KC中,鼻骨温度随着空气变暖而升高(6°C vs. -27°C) (P < 0.001)。在额骨和脸颊的HC中观察到RFI ×天相互作用的趋势,低RFI温度高于高RFI温度,分别为3°C和- 12°C (P < 0.09)。红外热成像检测到不同品种和冬季条件下与射频识别相关的温度差异。然而,热响应因地区和品种而异,限制了独立的可靠性。热成像可能支持饲料效率分类,但需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书