PS7-24. Dietary Supplementation of a Synergistic Blend of Phytogenic and Probiotics Improved Feed Conversion Ratio and Lesion of Coccidia Challenged Broiler Chickens.

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Yating Zhao, Shuhan Sun, Youngmin Park, Supatirada Wongchanla, Simone Chang, Yongzhu Yuan, Kelly Zhao Zhao, Hsinhung John Hsu, Chungnan Chen, Yanhong Liu
{"title":"PS7-24. Dietary Supplementation of a Synergistic Blend of Phytogenic and Probiotics Improved Feed Conversion Ratio and Lesion of Coccidia Challenged Broiler Chickens.","authors":"Yating Zhao, Shuhan Sun, Youngmin Park, Supatirada Wongchanla, Simone Chang, Yongzhu Yuan, Kelly Zhao Zhao, Hsinhung John Hsu, Chungnan Chen, Yanhong Liu","doi":"10.1093/jas/skag272.524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the study was to evaluate dietary supplementation of a synergistic blend of phytogenic and probiotics on performance, lesion score, and fecal oocyst counts in broilers chickens challenged with coccidiosis. A total of 240 two-day-old Ross 708 broiler chickens (54.80 ± 2.22 g body weight (BW)) were group-housed (5 chickens/pen; 12 pens/treatment) in battery brooders and randomly assigned to one of four treatments: negative control (NC), positive control (PC), supplementation of 0.10% or 0.15% of the syngergistic blend. The blend contained approximately 1 × 109 CFU/g Bacillus subtilis and 0.50% of tannin. All birds had ad libitum access to water and experimental diets throughout the experimental period. Following eight-day adaptation period, all chickens except that in NC were orally inoculated inoculated with unattenuated E. acervulina, E. maxima, and E. tenella (ADVENT®, Huvepharma Inc) in the feed. At day 5 and 10 post inoculation (PI), weight gain and feed intake were recorded, and feces were collected for oocyst enumeration. In addition, one chicken per pen on d 5 and 10 PI was sacrificed for lesion score assessment. All data were analyzed by the PROC MIXED of SAS. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were used to evaluate the linear and quadratic effects of the synergistic blend on the dependent variables. The mortality rates were 4.17% in control groups, and 1.67% and 3.33% in low or high synergistic blend groups throughout the experiment. Compared with NC, birds in the PC had lower (P < 0.01) BW on d 5 and 10 PI, reduced (P < 0.01) average daily gain from d 0 to 5 and d 5 to 10 PI, decreased (P = 0.068) average daily feed intake from d 5 to 10 PI, and increased (P < 0.01) feed efficiency from d 0 to 5 and 5 to 10 PI. Supplementation of the synergistic blend increased (linearly, P < 0.01) feed efficiency during the post inoculation periods. Chickens in coccidiosis challenge had greater fecal oocyst shedding on d 5 PI than d 10 PI. Supplementation of 0.10% of synergistic blend reduced the shedding of Emeria although no statistical differences were observed across challenge groups. Consistently, birds in 0.10% synergistic blend had lower (P < 0.10) lesion scores in the duodenum, jejunum, and cecum during the peak of coccidiosis (on d 5 PI). In conclusion, supplementation with the synergistic blend improved feed conversion ratio and reduced lesion scores and oocyst shedding in birds infected with Eimeria strains, with the 0.10% inclusion rate demonstrating greater efficacy.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate dietary supplementation of a synergistic blend of phytogenic and probiotics on performance, lesion score, and fecal oocyst counts in broilers chickens challenged with coccidiosis. A total of 240 two-day-old Ross 708 broiler chickens (54.80 ± 2.22 g body weight (BW)) were group-housed (5 chickens/pen; 12 pens/treatment) in battery brooders and randomly assigned to one of four treatments: negative control (NC), positive control (PC), supplementation of 0.10% or 0.15% of the syngergistic blend. The blend contained approximately 1 × 109 CFU/g Bacillus subtilis and 0.50% of tannin. All birds had ad libitum access to water and experimental diets throughout the experimental period. Following eight-day adaptation period, all chickens except that in NC were orally inoculated inoculated with unattenuated E. acervulina, E. maxima, and E. tenella (ADVENT®, Huvepharma Inc) in the feed. At day 5 and 10 post inoculation (PI), weight gain and feed intake were recorded, and feces were collected for oocyst enumeration. In addition, one chicken per pen on d 5 and 10 PI was sacrificed for lesion score assessment. All data were analyzed by the PROC MIXED of SAS. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were used to evaluate the linear and quadratic effects of the synergistic blend on the dependent variables. The mortality rates were 4.17% in control groups, and 1.67% and 3.33% in low or high synergistic blend groups throughout the experiment. Compared with NC, birds in the PC had lower (P < 0.01) BW on d 5 and 10 PI, reduced (P < 0.01) average daily gain from d 0 to 5 and d 5 to 10 PI, decreased (P = 0.068) average daily feed intake from d 5 to 10 PI, and increased (P < 0.01) feed efficiency from d 0 to 5 and 5 to 10 PI. Supplementation of the synergistic blend increased (linearly, P < 0.01) feed efficiency during the post inoculation periods. Chickens in coccidiosis challenge had greater fecal oocyst shedding on d 5 PI than d 10 PI. Supplementation of 0.10% of synergistic blend reduced the shedding of Emeria although no statistical differences were observed across challenge groups. Consistently, birds in 0.10% synergistic blend had lower (P < 0.10) lesion scores in the duodenum, jejunum, and cecum during the peak of coccidiosis (on d 5 PI). In conclusion, supplementation with the synergistic blend improved feed conversion ratio and reduced lesion scores and oocyst shedding in birds infected with Eimeria strains, with the 0.10% inclusion rate demonstrating greater efficacy.
PS7-24。饲粮中添加植物性和益生菌协同混合物可提高球虫攻毒肉鸡的饲料转化率和病变程度。
本研究的目的是评估饲粮中添加植物性和益生菌协同混合物对球虫病肉鸡生产性能、病变评分和粪便卵囊计数的影响。试验选用体重(54.80±2.22 g)的2日龄罗斯708肉鸡240只(5只/栏,12个栏/处理),随机分为阴性对照(NC)、阳性对照(PC)和添加0.10%或0.15%协同混合物4种处理。该混合物含有约1 × 109 CFU/g枯草芽孢杆菌和0.50%的单宁。在整个试验期间,所有的鸟都可以自由地获得水和实验饲料。经过8天的适应期后,除NC组外,所有鸡均口服接种未减毒的针窝E.、maxima E.和tenella E. (ADVENT®,Huvepharma Inc .)。接种后第5天和第10天记录增重和采食量,并收集粪便进行卵囊计数。在第5天和第10天每栏处死1只鸡进行病变评分。所有数据均采用SAS的PROC mix进行分析。采用正交多项式对比来评价协同混合对因变量的线性和二次效应。整个试验期间,对照组的死亡率为4.17%,低、高协同混合组的死亡率分别为1.67%和3.33%。与对照组相比,对照组第5天和第10天体重降低(P < 0.01),第0 ~ 5天和第5 ~ 10天平均日增重降低(P < 0.01),第5 ~ 10天平均日采食量降低(P = 0.068),第0 ~ 5天和第5 ~ 10天饲料效率提高(P < 0.01)。在接种后,添加增效混合物可提高饲料效率(线性,P < 0.01)。球虫病攻毒的鸡在第5天粪卵囊的脱落量大于第10天。添加0.10%的增效混合物可减少emera的脱落,但各组间无统计学差异。与此一致的是,在球虫病高峰期(第5天),0.10%协同混合物的鸡在十二指肠、空肠和盲肠的病变评分较低(P < 0.10)。综上所述,添加增效混合物可提高艾美耳球虫感染禽类的饲料转化率,减少病变评分和卵囊脱落,其中0.10%的添加率效果更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书