52. Transferability of Methane Emission SNP Effects from Dairy to Beef Cattle Populations.

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Timothy T Houghton, Samla M F Cunha, Madeline J McLennan, Katie M Wood, Angela Canovas, Filippo Miglior, Christine F Baes, Flavio S Schenkel
{"title":"52. Transferability of Methane Emission SNP Effects from Dairy to Beef Cattle Populations.","authors":"Timothy T Houghton, Samla M F Cunha, Madeline J McLennan, Katie M Wood, Angela Canovas, Filippo Miglior, Christine F Baes, Flavio S Schenkel","doi":"10.1093/jas/skag272.090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transferring single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects across cattle breeds has often proven to be unreliable for a range of traits, even when using higher-density SNP panels. However, methane production (MeP) may exhibit greater portability across breeds because it has not been subjected to the prolonged, intense selection applied to many economically important traits. The objective of this study was to predict direct genomic values (DGVs) for MeP in a crossbred beef population using SNP effects estimated in a dairy population and to assess correspondence between DGVbased groupings and observed emission levels. The dairy training set comprised 648 Canadian firstparity Holstein cows between 110 and 210 days in milk, measured with a GreenFeed system from 2017 to 2025 for 5 consecutive days, 3-4 times per day. Outlier records 3 standard deviations from the mean were removed, and records were averaged by day and then by week to yield a single record per cow. The pedigree contained 6,687 animals across 12 generations, out of which 2,787 animals were genotyped using the Illumina 50k SNP panel, including the 648 cows recorded for MeP. Genomic breeding values were estimated by fitting a linear animal model using single-step GBLUP, and SNP effects were back-solved using the software POSTGSF90. The target beef population consisted of 77 Angus x Simmental cows in their final trimester of gestation (average parity = 3). Beef cow MeP was measured using two voluntary GreenFeed systems over two 7-day collection periods. After excluding cows with insufficient MeP records (< 30) and those>3 standard deviations from the mean, 73 animals remained. Records were averaged by day and then across all days to create 1 record per cow. Cows were genotyped using the Illumina 100k SNP panel; 29,434 SNPs common to both panels were used for DGV prediction. DGVs were computed as the sum over loci of genotype dosages multiplied by their corresponding SNPeffect estimates from the Holstein population and partitioned into three tertiles (lowest, middle, highest values). When comparing DGV tertiles to MeP tertiles, out of the low-emitting MeP cows, 12/24 (50%) cows were correctly classified as low-emitters by their DGVs, while 6/24 (25%) were misclassified as high-emitters. Out of the high-emitting MeP cows, 9/24 cows (37.5%) were correctly classified as high-emitters, while 4/24 (16.7%) were misclassified as low-emitters. The study shows that there is moderate ability to phenotypically classify the 1/3 lowest or 1/3 highest MeP Angus x Simmental cows using about 30k SNPs from a Holstein population. However, the beef dataset size used in this investigation is small and limits broader inferences. Ongoing work will compare DGVs to adjusted MePs for known sources of environmental variation and will use larger datasets to validate and refine these preliminary findings.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transferring single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects across cattle breeds has often proven to be unreliable for a range of traits, even when using higher-density SNP panels. However, methane production (MeP) may exhibit greater portability across breeds because it has not been subjected to the prolonged, intense selection applied to many economically important traits. The objective of this study was to predict direct genomic values (DGVs) for MeP in a crossbred beef population using SNP effects estimated in a dairy population and to assess correspondence between DGVbased groupings and observed emission levels. The dairy training set comprised 648 Canadian firstparity Holstein cows between 110 and 210 days in milk, measured with a GreenFeed system from 2017 to 2025 for 5 consecutive days, 3-4 times per day. Outlier records 3 standard deviations from the mean were removed, and records were averaged by day and then by week to yield a single record per cow. The pedigree contained 6,687 animals across 12 generations, out of which 2,787 animals were genotyped using the Illumina 50k SNP panel, including the 648 cows recorded for MeP. Genomic breeding values were estimated by fitting a linear animal model using single-step GBLUP, and SNP effects were back-solved using the software POSTGSF90. The target beef population consisted of 77 Angus x Simmental cows in their final trimester of gestation (average parity = 3). Beef cow MeP was measured using two voluntary GreenFeed systems over two 7-day collection periods. After excluding cows with insufficient MeP records (< 30) and those>3 standard deviations from the mean, 73 animals remained. Records were averaged by day and then across all days to create 1 record per cow. Cows were genotyped using the Illumina 100k SNP panel; 29,434 SNPs common to both panels were used for DGV prediction. DGVs were computed as the sum over loci of genotype dosages multiplied by their corresponding SNPeffect estimates from the Holstein population and partitioned into three tertiles (lowest, middle, highest values). When comparing DGV tertiles to MeP tertiles, out of the low-emitting MeP cows, 12/24 (50%) cows were correctly classified as low-emitters by their DGVs, while 6/24 (25%) were misclassified as high-emitters. Out of the high-emitting MeP cows, 9/24 cows (37.5%) were correctly classified as high-emitters, while 4/24 (16.7%) were misclassified as low-emitters. The study shows that there is moderate ability to phenotypically classify the 1/3 lowest or 1/3 highest MeP Angus x Simmental cows using about 30k SNPs from a Holstein population. However, the beef dataset size used in this investigation is small and limits broader inferences. Ongoing work will compare DGVs to adjusted MePs for known sources of environmental variation and will use larger datasets to validate and refine these preliminary findings.
52. 奶牛甲烷排放SNP效应对肉牛种群的可转移性
在牛品种之间转移单核苷酸多态性(SNP)效应通常被证明对一系列性状是不可靠的,即使使用高密度SNP面板。然而,甲烷产量(MeP)可能在品种间表现出更大的可移植性,因为它没有受到许多经济上重要性状的长期、强烈选择的影响。本研究的目的是利用在奶牛种群中估计的SNP效应来预测杂交牛肉种群中MeP的直接基因组值(dgv),并评估dgv分组与观察到的排放水平之间的对应关系。奶牛训练集包括648头产奶110至210天的加拿大第一胎荷斯坦奶牛,使用绿色饲料系统从2017年到2025年连续5天进行测量,每天3-4次。取离平均值3个标准差的异常记录,按天取平均值,然后按周取平均值,得到每头奶牛的单个记录。该谱系包含12代6687只动物,其中2787只动物使用Illumina 50k SNP面板进行了基因分型,包括为MeP记录的648头奶牛。通过单步GBLUP拟合线性动物模型估计基因组育种价值,并使用POSTGSF90软件反求解SNP效应。目标牛肉种群包括77头处于妊娠最后三个月的安格斯×西门塔尔奶牛(平均胎次= 3)。在两个为期7天的收集期内,使用两个自愿绿色饲料系统测量肉牛的MeP。剔除MeP记录不足的奶牛(< 30)和那些&;gt;离平均值3个标准差,剩下73只动物。记录按天平均,然后在所有天中创建每头奶牛1条记录。使用Illumina 100k SNP面板对奶牛进行基因分型;两组共有的29,434个snp用于DGV预测。dgv的计算方法是基因型剂量位点的总和乘以来自荷斯坦种群的相应snpeeffect估计值,并分为三分位数(最低、中、最高值)。在比较DGV和MeP母牛时,在低排放MeP奶牛中,12/24(50%)奶牛被DGV正确分类为低排放,而6/24(25%)奶牛被错误分类为高排放。在MeP高排放奶牛中,9/24(37.5%)奶牛被正确归类为高排放奶牛,4/24(16.7%)奶牛被错误归类为低排放奶牛。研究表明,利用来自荷斯坦群体的约30k个snp,对1/3 MeP最低或最高的安格斯×西蒙塔尔奶牛进行表型分类的能力中等。然而,本调查中使用的牛肉数据集规模很小,限制了更广泛的推论。正在进行的工作将比较dgv与已知环境变化来源的调整后的mep,并将使用更大的数据集来验证和完善这些初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书