A multidimensional index with SpO2 at rest for predicting progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

Respiratory research & clinical practice Pub Date : 2026-09-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20250336
Soraya Abou El Hosn Cordero, Ana Carolina Lima Resende, Eliane Mancuzo, Karin Storrer, Letícia Ferreira Neves Arantes, Fernanda Aguiar, Maria Raquel Soares, Carlos Alberto de Castro Pereira
{"title":"A multidimensional index with SpO<sub>2</sub> at rest for predicting progressive pulmonary fibrosis.","authors":"Soraya Abou El Hosn Cordero, Ana Carolina Lima Resende, Eliane Mancuzo, Karin Storrer, Letícia Ferreira Neves Arantes, Fernanda Aguiar, Maria Raquel Soares, Carlos Alberto de Castro Pereira","doi":"10.36416/1806-3756/e20250336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a multidimensional weighted score for progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (fILD) on the basis of mortality risk and compare the score with the progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) guideline and Efficacy and Safety of Nintedanib in Patients with Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (INBUILD) trial criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of fILD patients evaluated from January of 2008 to January of 2020. Disease progression was evaluated by changes in dyspnea, HRCT findings, FVC, DL<sub>CO</sub>, and SpO<sub>2</sub>. Associations between the disease progression criteria and survival were analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier curves. By means of univariate Cox regression, a score was determined on the basis of the relative weights for the progression criteria. The score was derived and tested within the same cohort. We compared the score with the PPF guideline and INBUILD trial criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 380 patients were evaluated. Cox regression was used in order to assign points to the progression criteria: a decrease of < 90% in SpO<sub>2</sub> at rest (2 points); disease progression on HRCT (2 points); worsening dyspnea (1 point); a decrease ≥ 3% in SpO<sub>2</sub> at rest (1 point); a decrease of 5-9% in FVC (1 point); and a decrease ≥ 10% in FVC (2 points). The final score was categorized as follows: low risk, 0-2 points (n = 244), median survival = undetermined; intermediate risk, 3-4 points (n = 61), median survival = 81 months (95% CI, 65-96); and high risk, ≥ 5 points (n = 75), median survival = 57 months (95% CI, 38-75; p < 0.001). A total of 136 patients (35.8%) showed disease progression. Kappa concordance was 0.92 (p < 0.001) for the PPF guideline criteria and 0.81 (p < 0.001) for the INBUILD trial criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multidimensional weighted score allows us to estimate the risk of progressive fILD. When dichotomized, the concordance with the PPF guideline and INBUILD trial criteria is high. External validation is required before routine clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":524203,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory research & clinical practice","volume":"52 4","pages":"e20250336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13618716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory research & clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20250336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a multidimensional weighted score for progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (fILD) on the basis of mortality risk and compare the score with the progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) guideline and Efficacy and Safety of Nintedanib in Patients with Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (INBUILD) trial criteria.

Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of fILD patients evaluated from January of 2008 to January of 2020. Disease progression was evaluated by changes in dyspnea, HRCT findings, FVC, DLCO, and SpO2. Associations between the disease progression criteria and survival were analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier curves. By means of univariate Cox regression, a score was determined on the basis of the relative weights for the progression criteria. The score was derived and tested within the same cohort. We compared the score with the PPF guideline and INBUILD trial criteria.

Results: A total of 380 patients were evaluated. Cox regression was used in order to assign points to the progression criteria: a decrease of < 90% in SpO2 at rest (2 points); disease progression on HRCT (2 points); worsening dyspnea (1 point); a decrease ≥ 3% in SpO2 at rest (1 point); a decrease of 5-9% in FVC (1 point); and a decrease ≥ 10% in FVC (2 points). The final score was categorized as follows: low risk, 0-2 points (n = 244), median survival = undetermined; intermediate risk, 3-4 points (n = 61), median survival = 81 months (95% CI, 65-96); and high risk, ≥ 5 points (n = 75), median survival = 57 months (95% CI, 38-75; p < 0.001). A total of 136 patients (35.8%) showed disease progression. Kappa concordance was 0.92 (p < 0.001) for the PPF guideline criteria and 0.81 (p < 0.001) for the INBUILD trial criteria.

Conclusions: A multidimensional weighted score allows us to estimate the risk of progressive fILD. When dichotomized, the concordance with the PPF guideline and INBUILD trial criteria is high. External validation is required before routine clinical application.

静止时SpO2的多维指标预测进行性肺纤维化。
目的:建立基于死亡风险的进行性纤维化间质性肺病(fILD)多维加权评分,并与进行性肺纤维化(PPF)指南和尼达尼布在进行性纤维化间质性肺病(INBUILD)患者中的疗效和安全性试验标准进行比较。方法:这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究,对2008年1月至2020年1月的field患者进行评估。通过呼吸困难、HRCT表现、FVC、DLCO和SpO2的变化来评估疾病进展。通过Kaplan-Meier曲线分析疾病进展标准与生存之间的关系。通过单变量Cox回归,根据进展标准的相对权重确定评分。该评分是在同一队列中得出和测试的。我们将评分与PPF指南和INBUILD试验标准进行比较。结果:共评估了380例患者。采用Cox回归对进展标准进行评分:静息时SpO2下降< 90%(2分);HRCT上疾病进展(2分);呼吸困难加重(1分);静止状态下SpO2降低≥3%(1点);植被覆盖度降低5-9%(1点);FVC下降≥10%(2分)。最终评分分类如下:低风险,0-2分(n = 244),中位生存期=待定;中危,3-4分(n = 61),中位生存期= 81个月(95% CI, 65-96);高危,≥5分(n = 75),中位生存期= 57个月(95% CI, 38-75; p < 0.001)。136例(35.8%)出现疾病进展。PPF指南标准的Kappa一致性为0.92 (p < 0.001), INBUILD试验标准的Kappa一致性为0.81 (p < 0.001)。结论:多维加权评分使我们能够估计进行性field的风险。当二分类时,与PPF指南和INBUILD试验标准的一致性很高。常规临床应用前需进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书