Uncovering hypothesis-generating associations between prescription drugs and digestive cancer risk: a case-control drug-wide association study (DWAS).

IF 3.4
Peng Wang, Katsiaryna Bykov, Peter S Liang, Kelli O'Connell, Edward L Giovannucci, Robin B Mendelsohn, Lisa C Diamond, Elizabeth D Kantor, Mengmeng Du
{"title":"Uncovering hypothesis-generating associations between prescription drugs and digestive cancer risk: a case-control drug-wide association study (DWAS).","authors":"Peng Wang, Katsiaryna Bykov, Peter S Liang, Kelli O'Connell, Edward L Giovannucci, Robin B Mendelsohn, Lisa C Diamond, Elizabeth D Kantor, Mengmeng Du","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-26-0907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescription drug use among older adults is more common than ever, yet traditional trials are not designed to assess long-term outcomes. Thus, the potential impact of widely used medications on cancer risk remains unclear. This is particularly a concern for digestive cancers for several reasons, most notably their key role in drug absorption and metabolism. We therefore leverage large-scale data to conduct a multi-stage study, aimed at identifying potential associations between oral prescription drugs and digestive cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data for a case-control drug-wide association study (DWAS), followed by targeted analyses to further address confounding. Subsequent analyses conducted include incorporation of additional adjustment for comorbidities, use of active comparators as well as propensity scores. Associations between prescription drugs and digestive cancer were assessed using adjusted odds ratios (OR), with significance assessed using Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY)-adjusted p-values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In initial scan, 218 of 442 oral prescription drugs were associated with digestive cancer (BY-adjusted p<0.05). After our multi-stage targeted analyses, 38 drugs of interest (vs. their active comparators) remained associated with digestive cancer. Specifically, 10 drugs were positively associated (OR>1) and 28 were inversely associated (OR<1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study confirms some previously reported associations and identifies additional potential, novel associations between individual oral prescription drugs and digestive cancer that merit additional follow-up.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>These findings support the utility of our approach for hypothesis generation and warrant targeted confirmation in prospective studies as well as investigation of specific cancer types driving these associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520580,"journal":{"name":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13625935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-26-0907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prescription drug use among older adults is more common than ever, yet traditional trials are not designed to assess long-term outcomes. Thus, the potential impact of widely used medications on cancer risk remains unclear. This is particularly a concern for digestive cancers for several reasons, most notably their key role in drug absorption and metabolism. We therefore leverage large-scale data to conduct a multi-stage study, aimed at identifying potential associations between oral prescription drugs and digestive cancer risk.

Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data for a case-control drug-wide association study (DWAS), followed by targeted analyses to further address confounding. Subsequent analyses conducted include incorporation of additional adjustment for comorbidities, use of active comparators as well as propensity scores. Associations between prescription drugs and digestive cancer were assessed using adjusted odds ratios (OR), with significance assessed using Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY)-adjusted p-values.

Results: In initial scan, 218 of 442 oral prescription drugs were associated with digestive cancer (BY-adjusted p<0.05). After our multi-stage targeted analyses, 38 drugs of interest (vs. their active comparators) remained associated with digestive cancer. Specifically, 10 drugs were positively associated (OR>1) and 28 were inversely associated (OR<1).

Conclusions: Our study confirms some previously reported associations and identifies additional potential, novel associations between individual oral prescription drugs and digestive cancer that merit additional follow-up.

Impact: These findings support the utility of our approach for hypothesis generation and warrant targeted confirmation in prospective studies as well as investigation of specific cancer types driving these associations.

揭示处方药与消化系统癌症风险之间的假设关联:一项病例对照药物相关性研究(DWAS)。
背景:老年人处方药的使用比以往任何时候都更普遍,然而传统的试验并不是为了评估长期结果而设计的。因此,广泛使用的药物对癌症风险的潜在影响尚不清楚。由于几个原因,消化系统癌症尤其值得关注,最值得注意的是它们在药物吸收和代谢中的关键作用。因此,我们利用大规模数据开展了一项多阶段研究,旨在确定口服处方药与消化系统癌症风险之间的潜在关联。方法:我们使用监测,流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据进行病例对照药物相关性研究(DWAS),然后进行针对性分析以进一步解决混淆问题。随后进行的分析包括合并对合并症的额外调整,使用主动比较器以及倾向评分。使用校正优势比(OR)评估处方药与消化道癌之间的相关性,并使用Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY)校正p值评估显著性。结果:在初始扫描中,442种口服处方药中有218种与消化系统癌相关(by校正p1), 28种呈负相关(or)。结论:我们的研究证实了一些先前报道的关联,并确定了个别口服处方药与消化系统癌之间额外的潜在的、新的关联,值得进一步的随访。影响:这些发现支持我们的假设生成方法的实用性,并保证在前瞻性研究中有针对性的确认,以及对驱动这些关联的特定癌症类型的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书