Evelyn Arana-Chicas, Michael R Irwin, Cindy K Blair, Jinghua An, Samuel Tundealao, Yong Lin, Shou-En Lu, Chunxia Chen, Biren Saraiya, Dolores Guest, Wadih Arap, Emily Heidt, Anita Y Kinney
{"title":"Effects of Tai Chi Qigong on sleep quality in older male cancer survivors: A randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Evelyn Arana-Chicas, Michael R Irwin, Cindy K Blair, Jinghua An, Samuel Tundealao, Yong Lin, Shou-En Lu, Chunxia Chen, Biren Saraiya, Dolores Guest, Wadih Arap, Emily Heidt, Anita Y Kinney","doi":"10.61373/bm026a.0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare the efficacy of Tai Chi and Qigong (TCQ) versus exercise intensity-matched (EIM) and usual care (UC) on sleep quality in older male cancer survivors. We conducted a three-arm randomized controlled trial among male cancer survivors aged 55 years and older. Participants were randomized to UC or one of two group-based interventions (TCQ or EIM), delivered twice weekly for 12 weeks with follow-up through 12 months. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Linear contrasts estimated within-arm changes and between-arm differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 113 participants (mean age 69.1 (SD = 7 years); 77.0% White; 88.5% non-Hispanic) were enrolled. At 3-months post-intervention, between-arm differences in sleep quality were not significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The EIM arm showed significant within-arm improvements in sleep quality at the 6-week midpoint (<i>p</i> = 0.004), 1-week post-intervention (<i>p</i> = 0.048), and 3 months post-intervention (<i>p</i> = 0.011) from baseline. The TCQ arm showed nonsignificant trends toward within-arm improvement in sleep quality at the same time points. No significant effects were observed at 12 months. The EIM arm significantly improved sleep efficiency at 3 months compared with TCQ (<i>p</i> = 0.04). By 12 months, 62% of TCQ participants achieved clinical remission of sleep disturbance (PSQI ≤5), compared with 47% in the EIM arm and 43% in the UC arm (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Attendance was similar across TCQ (78.4%) and EIM (76.8%). TCQ and EIM produced modest short-term improvements in sleep quality among older male survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":520835,"journal":{"name":"Brain medicine : from neurons to behavior and better health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13618391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain medicine : from neurons to behavior and better health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61373/bm026a.0063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To compare the efficacy of Tai Chi and Qigong (TCQ) versus exercise intensity-matched (EIM) and usual care (UC) on sleep quality in older male cancer survivors. We conducted a three-arm randomized controlled trial among male cancer survivors aged 55 years and older. Participants were randomized to UC or one of two group-based interventions (TCQ or EIM), delivered twice weekly for 12 weeks with follow-up through 12 months. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Linear contrasts estimated within-arm changes and between-arm differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 113 participants (mean age 69.1 (SD = 7 years); 77.0% White; 88.5% non-Hispanic) were enrolled. At 3-months post-intervention, between-arm differences in sleep quality were not significant (p > 0.05). The EIM arm showed significant within-arm improvements in sleep quality at the 6-week midpoint (p = 0.004), 1-week post-intervention (p = 0.048), and 3 months post-intervention (p = 0.011) from baseline. The TCQ arm showed nonsignificant trends toward within-arm improvement in sleep quality at the same time points. No significant effects were observed at 12 months. The EIM arm significantly improved sleep efficiency at 3 months compared with TCQ (p = 0.04). By 12 months, 62% of TCQ participants achieved clinical remission of sleep disturbance (PSQI ≤5), compared with 47% in the EIM arm and 43% in the UC arm (p > 0.05). Attendance was similar across TCQ (78.4%) and EIM (76.8%). TCQ and EIM produced modest short-term improvements in sleep quality among older male survivors.