Insulin Dose-Adjusted Hemoglobin A1c Has Suboptimal Performance for Identifying C-Peptide-Defined Partial Remission: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.

IF 16.6
Diabetes care Pub Date : 2026-09-29 DOI:10.2337/dc26-1313
Michael L Ferm, Xiaofan Huang, Charles G Minard, Daniel J DeSalvo, Amy S Shah, Catherine Pihoker, Anna C Bellatorre, Maria J Redondo
{"title":"Insulin Dose-Adjusted Hemoglobin A1c Has Suboptimal Performance for Identifying C-Peptide-Defined Partial Remission: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.","authors":"Michael L Ferm, Xiaofan Huang, Charles G Minard, Daniel J DeSalvo, Amy S Shah, Catherine Pihoker, Anna C Bellatorre, Maria J Redondo","doi":"10.2337/dc26-1313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Insulin dose-adjusted hemoglobin A1c (IDAA1c = HbA1c [%] + [4 × total daily dose in units/kg/day]) ≤9 is widely used to define partial remission in pediatric type 1 diabetes and as an eligibility criterion or outcome in disease-modifying therapy trials. However, it has not been validated in U.S. youth. Because higher BMI increases insulin resistance and insulin requirements, we hypothesized that IDAA1c would perform suboptimally in participants with overweight or obesity.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 422 SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study participants with mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT)-stimulated C-peptide within 12 months of diagnosis. Partial remission was defined using MMTT-stimulated area under the curve (AUC) mean C-peptide. Participant characteristics were compared by BMI category (<85th percentile [normal or underweight] and ≥85th percentile [overweight or obese]) using Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher exact tests. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) AUC of IDAA1c ≤9 for identifying partial remission were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with normal or underweight versus participants with overweight or obesity had lower IDAA1c (8.95 vs. 9.28, P = 0.043) despite lower stimulated C-peptide (1.25 vs. 1.88 ng/mL, P < 0.001). Overall, IDAA1c ≤9 had 61% sensitivity and 79% specificity for predicting C-peptide ≥0.91 ng/mL with an ROC AUC of 0.77. Among participants with overweight or obesity, sensitivity was 45% and specificity 81%. A Youden index-derived cutoff of IDAA1c ≤11.6 improved sensitivity to 93%, with specificity of 54% in participants with overweight or obesity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IDAA1c ≤9 demonstrated suboptimal accuracy as a screening test for partial remission, especially underestimating β-cell function in youth with overweight or obesity. BMI-specific cutoffs improved sensitivity but reduced specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc26-1313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Insulin dose-adjusted hemoglobin A1c (IDAA1c = HbA1c [%] + [4 × total daily dose in units/kg/day]) ≤9 is widely used to define partial remission in pediatric type 1 diabetes and as an eligibility criterion or outcome in disease-modifying therapy trials. However, it has not been validated in U.S. youth. Because higher BMI increases insulin resistance and insulin requirements, we hypothesized that IDAA1c would perform suboptimally in participants with overweight or obesity.

Research design and methods: We analyzed data from 422 SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study participants with mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT)-stimulated C-peptide within 12 months of diagnosis. Partial remission was defined using MMTT-stimulated area under the curve (AUC) mean C-peptide. Participant characteristics were compared by BMI category (<85th percentile [normal or underweight] and ≥85th percentile [overweight or obese]) using Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher exact tests. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) AUC of IDAA1c ≤9 for identifying partial remission were evaluated.

Results: Participants with normal or underweight versus participants with overweight or obesity had lower IDAA1c (8.95 vs. 9.28, P = 0.043) despite lower stimulated C-peptide (1.25 vs. 1.88 ng/mL, P < 0.001). Overall, IDAA1c ≤9 had 61% sensitivity and 79% specificity for predicting C-peptide ≥0.91 ng/mL with an ROC AUC of 0.77. Among participants with overweight or obesity, sensitivity was 45% and specificity 81%. A Youden index-derived cutoff of IDAA1c ≤11.6 improved sensitivity to 93%, with specificity of 54% in participants with overweight or obesity.

Conclusions: IDAA1c ≤9 demonstrated suboptimal accuracy as a screening test for partial remission, especially underestimating β-cell function in youth with overweight or obesity. BMI-specific cutoffs improved sensitivity but reduced specificity.

胰岛素剂量调整的糖化血红蛋白在鉴别c肽定义的部分缓解方面表现欠佳:青年糖尿病研究
目的:胰岛素剂量调整血红蛋白A1c (IDAA1c = HbA1c [%] + [4 ×总日剂量单位/kg/天])≤9被广泛用于定义儿童1型糖尿病部分缓解,并作为疾病改善治疗试验的合格标准或结局。然而,它尚未在美国年轻人中得到验证。由于较高的BMI会增加胰岛素抵抗和胰岛素需求,我们假设IDAA1c在超重或肥胖的参与者中表现不佳。研究设计和方法:我们分析了422名患有混合膳食耐受试验(MMTT)刺激的c肽在诊断12个月内的青年糖尿病研究参与者的数据。用mmtt刺激的曲线下面积(AUC)平均c肽来定义部分缓解。通过BMI类别比较参与者的特征(结果:正常或体重不足的参与者与超重或肥胖的参与者相比,尽管刺激的c肽较低(1.25对1.88 ng/mL, P < 0.001),但IDAA1c较低(8.95对9.28,P = 0.043)。总体而言,IDAA1c≤9预测c肽≥0.91 ng/mL的敏感性为61%,特异性为79%,ROC AUC为0.77。在超重或肥胖的参与者中,敏感性为45%,特异性为81%。Youden指数得出的IDAA1c≤11.6的临界值将敏感性提高到93%,超重或肥胖参与者的特异性为54%。结论:IDAA1c≤9作为部分缓解筛查试验的准确性不理想,特别是在超重或肥胖的青少年中低估β细胞功能。bmi特异性临界值提高了敏感性,但降低了特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书