Determinants of maternal health service utilisation among refugee women in Krisan and Ampain camps, Ghana: a cross-sectional analysis.

IF 2.4 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2026-09-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2026.1807016
Linus Baatiema, John Kuumuori Ganle, Francis Appiah, Daprim Samual Ogaji
{"title":"Determinants of maternal health service utilisation among refugee women in Krisan and Ampain camps, Ghana: <i>a cross-sectional analysis</i>.","authors":"Linus Baatiema, John Kuumuori Ganle, Francis Appiah, Daprim Samual Ogaji","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2026.1807016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal healthcare utilization among refugee populations remains a major public health concern due to intersecting social, structural, and health system barriers. Guided by Andersen's Healthcare Utilization Theory (1995), this study examined the determinants of antenatal care, skilled delivery, and postnatal care among refugee women in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 410 refugee women aged 15-49 years residing in the Krisan and Ampain refugee camps in the Western Region of Ghana. Eligible women who had experienced a pregnancy within the preceding two years were recruited using a census approach. Data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Because the prevalence of ANC attendance (≥4 visits) was low, Firth's penalized likelihood logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with ANC utilization. For skilled delivery and PNC utilization, conventional multivariable logistic regression was used. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported, and statistical significance was assessed at <i>p</i> < 0.05. Camp location was included as a fixed effect in all models. Multilevel modeling was not employed as only two camps were included, which is insufficient for reliable random effects estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of refugee women attended fewer than four ANC visits (93.9%), while 72.4% delivered with skilled birth attendants and only 31.0% received postnatal care. ANC utilization was significantly higher among women residing in Krisan Camp (AOR = 9.54; 95% CI: 1.68-54.30) and those receiving transport support (AOR = 4.31; 95% CI: 1.12-16.58). Income was not significantly associated with ANC attendance, with women earning GHS 100-499 (AOR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.00-1.00) and ≥ GHS 500 (AOR = 0.03; 95% CI: 0.00-1.05) having lower odds of ANC attendance. Trustful social networks were paradoxically associated with lower ANC utilization (AOR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.11-0.96). Skilled delivery was associated with education, with secondary or higher education linked to lower odds (AOR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.31-0.99), while media exposure showed a marginal positive effect. Postnatl utilization was higher among Muslim women (AOR = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.15-3.55) and lower among married women (AOR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Maternal healthcare utilization among refugee women in Ghana is influenced by complex interactions between social support, access-related factors, and individual characteristics. Interventions that strengthen social networks, improve transport and service accessibility, and address contextual barriers within refugee camps are critical to improving maternal health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1807016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2026.1807016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maternal healthcare utilization among refugee populations remains a major public health concern due to intersecting social, structural, and health system barriers. Guided by Andersen's Healthcare Utilization Theory (1995), this study examined the determinants of antenatal care, skilled delivery, and postnatal care among refugee women in Ghana.

Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 410 refugee women aged 15-49 years residing in the Krisan and Ampain refugee camps in the Western Region of Ghana. Eligible women who had experienced a pregnancy within the preceding two years were recruited using a census approach. Data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Because the prevalence of ANC attendance (≥4 visits) was low, Firth's penalized likelihood logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with ANC utilization. For skilled delivery and PNC utilization, conventional multivariable logistic regression was used. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported, and statistical significance was assessed at p < 0.05. Camp location was included as a fixed effect in all models. Multilevel modeling was not employed as only two camps were included, which is insufficient for reliable random effects estimation.

Results: The majority of refugee women attended fewer than four ANC visits (93.9%), while 72.4% delivered with skilled birth attendants and only 31.0% received postnatal care. ANC utilization was significantly higher among women residing in Krisan Camp (AOR = 9.54; 95% CI: 1.68-54.30) and those receiving transport support (AOR = 4.31; 95% CI: 1.12-16.58). Income was not significantly associated with ANC attendance, with women earning GHS 100-499 (AOR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.00-1.00) and ≥ GHS 500 (AOR = 0.03; 95% CI: 0.00-1.05) having lower odds of ANC attendance. Trustful social networks were paradoxically associated with lower ANC utilization (AOR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.11-0.96). Skilled delivery was associated with education, with secondary or higher education linked to lower odds (AOR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.31-0.99), while media exposure showed a marginal positive effect. Postnatl utilization was higher among Muslim women (AOR = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.15-3.55) and lower among married women (AOR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.98).

Conclusions: Maternal healthcare utilization among refugee women in Ghana is influenced by complex interactions between social support, access-related factors, and individual characteristics. Interventions that strengthen social networks, improve transport and service accessibility, and address contextual barriers within refugee camps are critical to improving maternal health outcomes.

加纳Krisan和Ampain难民营难民妇女利用孕产妇保健服务的决定因素:横断面分析。
背景:由于交叉的社会、结构和卫生系统障碍,难民人口中的孕产妇保健利用仍然是一个主要的公共卫生问题。在Andersen的医疗保健利用理论(1995年)的指导下,本研究调查了加纳难民妇女产前护理、熟练分娩和产后护理的决定因素。方法:对居住在加纳西部地区Krisan和Ampain难民营的410名15-49岁的难民妇女进行了横断面分析研究。使用人口普查方法招募了在过去两年内怀孕的符合条件的妇女。数据采用结构化的访谈问卷收集。由于ANC的使用率(≥4次就诊)较低,因此采用Firth的惩罚似然逻辑回归来检查与ANC使用相关的因素。对于熟练分娩和PNC的使用,使用传统的多变量逻辑回归。报告了校正优势比(AORs), 95%可信区间(ci),统计显著性评估为p。结果:大多数难民妇女参加了少于4次ANC就诊(93.9%),而72.4%的分娩是由熟练助产士接生的,只有31.0%的人接受了产后护理。居住在Krisan难民营的妇女(AOR = 9.54, 95% CI: 1.68-54.30)和接受交通支持的妇女(AOR = 4.31, 95% CI: 1.12-16.58)的ANC利用率显著较高。收入与ANC出席率无显著相关性,收入GHS 100-499 (AOR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.00-1.00)和GHS≥500 (AOR = 0.03; 95% CI: 0.00-1.05)的妇女出席ANC的几率较低。可信的社会网络与较低的ANC利用率矛盾地相关(AOR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.11-0.96)。熟练分娩与教育有关,中等或高等教育与较低的风险相关(AOR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.31-0.99),而媒体暴露则显示出边际的积极影响。穆斯林妇女产后利用率较高(AOR = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.15-3.55),已婚妇女产后利用率较低(AOR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.98)。结论:加纳难民妇女的孕产妇保健利用受到社会支持、获取相关因素和个人特征之间复杂的相互作用的影响。加强社会网络、改善交通和服务可及性以及消除难民营内环境障碍的干预措施对于改善孕产妇保健结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书